-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31/10/2012 21:38, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 10/29/2012 04:06 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 10/29/2012 05:39 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2012-10-29, Michel Alexandre Salim
On 10/31/2012 11:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:59:54AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
I think we need to give developers more time for feature integration
after the feature freeze.
+1
No matter whether we increase the length of development or not, the time
between
Le 31/10/2012 22:25, Gianluca Sforna a écrit :
So, befoer I dig into manuals, can you name the most common causes for
breakage?
Some explanation on the tracker bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871373
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 10/31/2012 11:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:59:54AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
I think we need to give developers more time for feature integration
after the feature freeze.
+1
No
On 11/01/2012 08:37 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/31/2012 11:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:59:54AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
I think we need to give developers more time for feature integration
after the feature freeze.
+1
No matter whether we increase the
http://fpaste.org/5mbi/
2 days ago It was just a libvirt package but now gnome and empathy
packages also broken too.
--
--
Onuralp SEZER
Fedora Ambassadors http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
EMEAhttp://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/EMEAMember / Turkey
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 10:03:20 +0200
Onuralp SEZER thunderbir...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
http://fpaste.org/5mbi/
2 days ago It was just a libvirt package but now gnome and empathy
packages also broken too.
Not broken as such, just that not all
pkgs arrive in the repo, at the same time.
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 04:03 PM, Onuralp SEZER wrote:
http://fpaste.org/5mbi/
2 days ago It was just a libvirt package but now gnome and empathy
packages also broken too.
You're using the -testing repositories. Packages get pushed there,
unpushed, downgraded,...
If, for example,
Tom Lane píše v St 31. 10. 2012 v 11:08 -0400:
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com writes:
... Practically speaking, for F18,
though, I think we just need to soldier on with newUI and get it done as
best we can. Obviously slipping the schedule by a week again and again
in response to the
Le mercredi 31 octobre 2012 à 10:59 -0700, Jesse Keating a écrit :
On 10/31/2012 09:56 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
* Jesse Keating, Jeremy Katz, and others who helped shape the current policy
and theory of our release schedule felt that the 6 month release cycle
was
fine but that
On 10/31/2012 01:07 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
// small wrapper script around deltacloud:
$ wget https://raw.github.com/movitto/mycloud/master/mycloud.rb
$ chmod +x mycloud.rb
// template describing kojihub cloud deployment
$ wget
On 10/31/2012 01:10 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Mo Morsi wrote:
#2: Could there be a way to take a (working) nightly build, build
one's package against that nightly in a personal build of some sort,
and somehow have a verification process that it built in that
personal
On 11/01/2012 08:33 AM, Mo Morsi wrote:
On 10/31/2012 01:10 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Mo Morsi wrote:
#2: Could there be a way to take a (working) nightly build, build
one's package against that nightly in a personal build of some sort,
and somehow have a verification
And whoever want to install unity or these packages, can just use
GNOME:Ayatana from the open build service :)
regards,
Damian
2012/11/1 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com:
I currently own a few packages related to my old abortive attempt to
build Unity for Fedora. I don't have time to
The packages look like they were retired after being orphaned for a few
fedora cycles. You'll need to resubmit them proper, but should be able
to base the new packages on the existing ones pre-retirement. And in
the case of moneta, the package version is the same so that can just be
resubmitted
Compose started at Thu Nov 1 09:15:25 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[dhcp-forwarder]
dhcp-forwarder-upstart-0.10-1801.fc18.noarch requires /sbin/initctl
[dnf]
dnf-0.2.14-2.git4831982.fc18.noarch requires python-hawkey =
On 11/01/2012 06:06 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote:
And whoever want to install unity or these packages, can just use
GNOME:Ayatana from the open build service :)
Unfortunately that replaces many important components with forked
versions. If it was a pure add-on repository, that would be ok.
Rahul
On 11/01/2012 12:22 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Maybe having some kind of dependencies between feature could also be a
idea. Anaconda requires dracut to not change, so we need a way to
express this, and a way to avoid changes at the same time. The same goes
for a python upgrade or lots of things.
Compose started at Thu Nov 1 08:15:06 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[LabPlot]
LabPlot-1.6.0.2-12.fc18.i686 requires libaudiofile.so.0
LabPlot-1.6.0.2-12.fc18.x86_64 requires libaudiofile.so.0()(64bit)
[PyKDE]
On 10/31/2012 08:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Only one package depends on any of these: gwibber depends on dee. So
someone interested in gwibber might want to pick up dee.
I'll take dee, although, gwibber will never progress past 3.6, because
the upstream (Canonical) plan is to convert gwibber
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/31/2012 08:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Only one package depends on any of these: gwibber depends on dee. So
someone interested in gwibber might want to pick up dee.
I'll take dee, although, gwibber will never
- Original Message -
I currently own a few packages related to my old abortive attempt to
build Unity for Fedora. I don't have time to maintain these or any
direct interest in them - they were just Unity building blocks to me.
I'm orphaning these packages:
bamf
compiz-plugins-main
Le jeudi 01 novembre 2012 à 08:32 -0400, Mo Morsi a écrit :
On 10/31/2012 01:07 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
You can orchestrate all of these steps across/between multiple systems
using ansible: http://ansible.cc - I've been documenting spinning up and
provisioning instances on my blog in the
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 07:17:30PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 03:09 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
I'd recommend asking dcantrell, as he has some good points on this
topic. I broadly agree with him that it might well be more or less
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Mo Morsi wrote:
Cool thanks for the info Seth. Ansible looks interesting, its a
configuration orchestration component akin to Puppet / Chef is it not?
Does it do any provisioning in itself?
Ansible is more like this:
Combining puppet and chef in one item. Then making
On 11/01/2012 09:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
mailto:tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/31/2012 08:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Only one package depends on any of these: gwibber depends on dee. So
someone
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 07:38:27AM -0400, Scott Schmit wrote:
Given the current state of F18 I agree let's lengthen this release
cycle up to 9 months and arguably we should lengthen the whole
^
development cycle to 9 months from
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/01/2012 09:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
mailto:tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/31/2012 08:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Only
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Mo Morsi wrote:
Hrm I was refering more to the repos necessary to bootstrap the cloud
instance for the koji builder.
I see - I thought you were referring to package repos.
Which component imposes this limitation
on koji, the hub or the builder?
the hub.
Would
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 09:24:52AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
There are features and features... some of them are new versions of
leafnode packages or a just bunch of new packages which nothing else
depends on, and some of them affect *everything* in the distro.
Perhaps the invasive changes
Hi all,
It's important to recognise the negative effects of delays to the
release. Upstream projects are reliant on the Fedora release process to get
updates out to their users. GNOME released version 3.6 on 26 September. It
was a big release and contained major improvements to our user
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 13:01 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/01/2012 12:22 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Maybe having some kind of dependencies between feature could also be a
idea. Anaconda requires dracut to not change, so we need a way to
express this, and a way to avoid changes at
On 10/31/2012 05:59 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/31/2012 09:56 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
* Jesse Keating, Jeremy Katz, and others who helped shape the current
policy
and theory of our release schedule felt that the 6 month release
cycle was
fine but that certain features were going
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:25:39PM +, Allan Day wrote:
It's important to recognise the negative effects of delays to the
release. Upstream projects are reliant on the Fedora release process to get
updates out to their users. GNOME released version 3.6 on 26 September. It
was a big release
Am 01.11.2012 15:41, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
We ( QA community ) would benefit from a longer release cycle since we
need more time to properly test features and other vital components
and arguably the QA part of an feature should FESCO delegate to QA
community to oversee and handle...
Some MPI updates:
- I built openmpi 1.6.3 in rawhide yesterday. This had an unexpected bump in
the libmpi_f90.so soname. I know this affects hdf5 and netcdf-fortran, both
my packages and I'll be rebuilding them later today (hopefully).
- MPI packaging guidelines have changed
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Heiko Adams heiko.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe we should think again about switching to a roling release models
for Fedora stable. This would IMHO have some benefits to the whole
community.
I'm afraid a rolling release model would make it *harder* to make
major
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
It's important to recognise the negative effects of delays to the release.
OLPC is downstream of F18, and planning to ship an OLPC OS version
13.1.0 first week of December 2012 (approx); which will be based on
F18.
We are not
commit c680f3ad42b87972392ae01751448a370400a137
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 1 16:57:03 2012 +0100
Do not export under-specified dependencies
perl-podlators.spec | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-podlators.spec
On 11/01/2012 07:32 AM, David Lehman wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 13:01 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/01/2012 12:22 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Maybe having some kind of dependencies between feature could also be a
idea. Anaconda requires dracut to not change, so we need a way to
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 09:56 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 09:24:52AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
There are features and features... some of them are new versions of
leafnode packages or a just bunch of new packages which nothing else
depends on, and some of them
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 09:32 -0500, David Lehman wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 13:01 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/01/2012 12:22 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Maybe having some kind of dependencies between feature could also be a
idea. Anaconda requires dracut to not change, so we
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 15:56 +0100, Heiko Adams wrote:
Am 01.11.2012 15:41, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
We ( QA community ) would benefit from a longer release cycle since we
need more time to properly test features and other vital components
and arguably the QA part of an feature
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 09:32 -0500, David Lehman wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 13:01 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/01/2012 12:22 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Maybe having some kind of dependencies between
On 11/01/2012 07:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 09:56 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 09:24:52AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
There are features and features... some of them are new versions of
leafnode packages or a just bunch of new packages which
It would have been super nice to actually include a link in all of those
bugs, or some reference. I mean, they must have been filed by program,
so it's not as if you would have had to do a bunch of extra typing.
We really need a mass bug filing howto or something. Preferably
starting with
Adam Williamson wrote:
I didn't want to throw this grenade into the debate, but now someone
else has, I'll just note that I was in favour of this before and I'm
still in favour of it now. :) Rolling release is a model that makes
clear sense for a distribution with the goals that Fedora has.
Björn Persson (bjorn@rombobjörn.se) said:
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
From bug #871503 (and I apologize if I'm reading this wrong), it
appears that the dependency on /bin/perl is being caused by the
hardcoded $PATH in openssh.
To fix the problem, I think we would not only need to provide
- Original Message -
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:08:39AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I was rather thinking we can simply take advantage of the critical
path
definition here. After all, when we came up with the critpath, the
idea
was it was a general concept which could be
On 11/01/2012 06:09 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
We were thinking with a few folks more about Self contained feature
but yeah, there's a lack of real definition.
Other thing is - these Self contained features could be approved
implicitly once are announced on devel list (in cooperation with
- Original Message -
On 11/01/2012 06:09 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
We were thinking with a few folks more about Self contained
feature
but yeah, there's a lack of real definition.
Other thing is - these Self contained features could be approved
implicitly once are announced
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:09:21PM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
That sounds good. Maybe recast those ideas as three levels?
- Critical Path Feature
- Other Enhancement Feature
- New Leaf Feature
We were thinking with a few folks more about Self contained feature
but yeah, there's a
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:09:21PM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
That sounds good. Maybe recast those ideas as three levels?
- Critical Path Feature
- Other Enhancement Feature
- New Leaf Feature
We were
- Original Message -
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:09:21PM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
That sounds good. Maybe recast those ideas as three levels?
- Critical Path Feature
- Other Enhancement
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:09:21PM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
That sounds good. Maybe recast those ideas
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:09:21PM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
That sounds good. Maybe recast those ideas
The Fedora ARM team is pleased to announce that the Fedora 18 Alpha release
for ARM is now available for download from:
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/test/18-Alpha/Images/armhfp/
The Alpha release includes prebuilt images for the Trimslice, Pandaboard and
Highbank
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 07:41:21PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
I think Leaf is better than Self contained, since it's unlikely for the
feature to have zero outside dependencies. I think it'd be fine for such a
feature to rely on small changes to existing packages (version updates,
say).
I'd
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 19:50 +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:09:21PM -0400, Jaroslav
The other thing that we mustn't forget are major changes that aren't
put through the feature process, but slip in via the back door.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 08:13:57PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
The other thing that we mustn't forget are major changes that aren't
put through the feature process, but slip in via the back door.
That's where the critpath vs. other enhancement distinction comes in -- for
critpath we can be
On 11/01/2012 08:13 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
The other thing that we mustn't forget are major changes that aren't
put through the feature process, but slip in via the back door.
As far as I know you are not obligated to participate in the feature
process and what do you exactly define as
Summary of changes:
3863b4d... Update to 1.36 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 21:28 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/01/2012 08:13 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
The other thing that we mustn't forget are major changes that aren't
put through the feature process, but slip in via the back door.
As far as I know you are not obligated to
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:08:36 -0600
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
Some MPI updates:
- I built openmpi 1.6.3 in rawhide yesterday. This had an unexpected
bump in the libmpi_f90.so soname. I know this affects hdf5 and
netcdf-fortran, both my packages and I'll be rebuilding them
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:43:00PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I think I once proposed that FESCo should formally have the ability to
declare that a given change ought to be a feature and force it through
the feature process, but that proposal was rejected.
I think that requiring the feature
Using F18 TC6 in a KVM install, I was able to install texlive-2012 as
per the updates-testing packages, and look at the state of generating
documenation with DocBook toolchains using dblatex and Doxygen
toolchains using pdflatex.
This is related to RH488651, the tracker bug to update TeX in
On Qui, 2012-11-01 at 19:14 -0700, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote:
Using F18 TC6 in a KVM install, I was able to install texlive-2012 as
per the updates-testing packages, and look at the state of generating
documenation with DocBook toolchains using dblatex and Doxygen
toolchains using pdflatex.
Hi,
I am working on bug
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871119)/etc/sysconfig/i18n is no
longer used.
On fedora 17, system-config-language sets attributes LANG,SYSFONT in
/etc/sysconfig/i18n file.
Fedora 18, i checked the locale.conf file which has only one attribute i.e LANG.
I
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le jeudi 01 novembre 2012 à 08:32 -0400, Mo Morsi a écrit :
On 10/31/2012 01:07 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
You can orchestrate all of these steps across/between multiple systems
using ansible: http://ansible.cc - I've been documenting spinning up and
commit 64bd1ece4d814b543d85db53d5c1493331f1d80d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 1 10:36:44 2012 +0100
Specify all dependencies
perl-SQL-Statement.spec | 37 -
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 246a7a0f70961b447af293599f4f99b16ece3362
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 1 10:47:11 2012 +0100
Quallify run-requires
perl-SQL-Statement.spec |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-SQL-Statement.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Digest-SHA:
83aca045c10c8e023ec50d66d192a076 Digest-SHA-5.73.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5e41e047231710643e2e4d576dd943356bbefc9a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 1 10:54:46 2012 +0100
5.73 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Digest-SHA.spec |9 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871874
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the F-18 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872157
Bug ID: 872157
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872158
Bug ID: 872158
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
commit 3a4f5e9da562bfb35aec4b39ef7856b7e9827881
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 1 13:07:52 2012 +0100
Make building non-interactive
perl-Module-Signature.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-Signature.spec
commit c43277c712cab384f4359450b1e333598fd44c24
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 1 13:08:25 2012 +0100
Fix a typo
perl-Module-Signature.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-Signature.spec
commit 4511acce3c121e83621beb9559ca5917c5266a96
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 1 13:14:19 2012 +0100
Specify all dependencies
perl-Module-Signature.spec | 15 +--
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit eda7326ab4c9acfc959cd4e1907f2328787ecfda
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 1 13:18:20 2012 +0100
Update dependencies. Use DESTDIR instead of PERL_INSTALL_ROOT
perl-threads.spec | 12
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-3.fc17.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872157
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
commit 2aee2b933772ea12aa9e244d67948e8f49d5298f
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 1 14:13:49 2012 +0100
Add BRs perl(Carp), perl(Exporter).
Signed-off-by: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
perl-Browser-Open.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Date-Manip:
e060c47350c7b7c1ed25e7a52ecac4a9 Date-Manip-6.36.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f007b2d48a5ee6fb85fa6f4fd8233db905d51c14
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 1 14:58:14 2012 +0100
6.36 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Date-Manip.spec | 12 +++-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872157
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MIME-Types:
94b44788ccf668ce155d0973d8e14a5b MIME-Types-1.36.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-MIME-Types-1.36-1.fc18' was created pointing to:
3863b4d... Update to 1.36
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-MIME-Types-1.36-1.fc19' was created pointing to:
3863b4d... Update to 1.36
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
91 matches
Mail list logo
