On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 2:25 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > We're not getting rid of Firefox.
>
> At least that is an answer, unlike the complete radio silence on:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920298
>
> Still does not explain why Firefox has to be
OLD: Fedora-38-20230209.n.1
NEW: Fedora-38-20230213.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:52
Upgraded packages: 238
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:1.75 GiB
Size
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 38 Branched 20230213.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> And is kept up to date, unlike QtWebEngine. QtWebEngine is invariably
> behind on security patches. I blame Google for not making embedded
> Chromium a first-class citizen.
Qt backports security fixes to its stable branches, a service Google is not
offering by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166725
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169304
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2167024
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Term-ShellUI-0.92-27.e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2167096
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-RPM2-1.4-22.el9
Neal Gompa wrote:
> We're not getting rid of Firefox.
At least that is an answer, unlike the complete radio silence on:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920298
Still does not explain why Firefox has to be the default though.
But the thing is, this inevitably leads to:
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2167120
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On Mon Feb 13, 2023 at 15:30 CST, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Ah, in that case I think my best course of action is see if I can use
> fedrq as a library and possibly extend it to be able to override dnf
> options (like where repos are).
There's no need to do that. fedrq can load any .repo
On Mon Feb 13, 2023 at 17:05 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > ```
> > $ fedrq whatrequires -X -F source $(fedrq subpkgs SRCNAME) # equivalent
> > $ fedrq subpkgs SRCNAME | fedrq whatrequires -X -i -F source # equivalent
> > ```
>
> Since your mail does not
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 9:16 PM Kenneth Goldman wrote:
> I have a fedora account.
>
>
>
> How do I get packager status? How do I work with a packager - is that a
> person or a program?
>
A quick google gave me this link:
On 2/13/23 16:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 4:00 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
>>
>> Neal Gompa wrote:
>>> FYI, if the GTK-based Anaconda UI goes away, the KDE variants probably
>>> ship a thin QtWebEngine wrapper or use Firefox instead for the
>>> web-based UI. No reason
Ah, in that case I think my best course of action is see if I can use fedrq as
a library and possibly extend it to be able to override dnf options (like where
repos are).
Would such PRs be acceptable?
Thanks,
Michel
___
devel mailing list --
I have a fedora account.
How do I get packager status? How do I work with a packager - is that a person
or a program?
From: Stephen Smoogen
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2023 3:04 PM
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: TSS maintainer volunteer
On
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 4:00 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > FYI, if the GTK-based Anaconda UI goes away, the KDE variants probably
> > ship a thin QtWebEngine wrapper or use Firefox instead for the
> > web-based UI. No reason to depend on WebKitGTK for this.
>
> Well,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 15:56, Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > The following is from the F38 image from last week?
> >
> > dnf remove qt5-qtwebengine
> > Error:
> > Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protected
Neal Gompa wrote:
> FYI, if the GTK-based Anaconda UI goes away, the KDE variants probably
> ship a thin QtWebEngine wrapper or use Firefox instead for the
> web-based UI. No reason to depend on WebKitGTK for this.
Well, the way the Anaconda web UI is currently packaged, it hardcodes a
Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> The following is from the F38 image from last week?
>
> dnf remove qt5-qtwebengine
> Error:
> Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protected
> packages: plasma-desktop
QtWebEngine is the native web engine of the KDE desktop and the one that
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 1:56 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > I did a check on some.. I only downloaded 3 isos so this isn't a complete
> > set.
>
> I think trying to track down 11 to 16 years of creeping bloat now is pretty
> much a lost cause, but one thing I
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 13:56, Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > I did a check on some.. I only downloaded 3 isos so this isn't a complete
> > set.
>
>
>
> As for qt5-qtwebkit, I am not sure what dragged this in on F33. We have
> been
>
Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> I did a check on some.. I only downloaded 3 isos so this isn't a complete
> set.
I think trying to track down 11 to 16 years of creeping bloat now is pretty
much a lost cause, but one thing I notice:
> The 20 largest packages on 33 is:
[snip]
> 47955205 qt5-qtwebkit
>
Hi Michel,
Thanks for the feedback!
On Mon Feb 13, 2023 at 08:04 CST, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> The subpackages command looks interesting, and potentially something I
> can use in ebranch!
I like it too :).
> Can you use rpmdistro-repoquery's repo definitions? That would allow
> dropping
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 12:44:03PM +0100, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I'm currently working on bringing liboqs [1] to rawhide.
>
> According to [2], I've added the following line to the spec file:
>
> License: MIT and Apache 2.0 and BSD 3-Clause and CC0-1.0 and Unlicense
>
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 11:28, Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > We need to be much stricter on size increases! In Fedora 9 (when the xz
> > compression for live images was introduced, which made it smaller than
> > Fedora 7 or 8),
On Sat, 2023-02-11 at 18:38 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Ben Cotton wrote:
> > 1–3. distribution — {Workstation,Everything,Server} boot x86_64 image
> > exceeds maximum size — ASSIGNED
>
> Let me guess, this is from the -fno-omit-frame-pointers Change? I have been
> asking for data on
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> We need to be much stricter on size increases! In Fedora 9 (when the xz
> compression for live images was introduced, which made it smaller than
> Fedora 7 or 8), the x86_64 KDE Spin was 729272320 bytes.
I have to correct myself: Fedora 9 was not where xz was
Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> ```
> $ fedrq whatrequires -X -F source $(fedrq subpkgs SRCNAME) # equivalent
> $ fedrq subpkgs SRCNAME | fedrq whatrequires -X -i -F source # equivalent
> ```
Since your mail does not document what the -X flag does:
Quoting:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 03:01:34PM +0100, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> ssmoogen
> Current s390x status: Networking and storage on systems is not acting
> appropriately. Site admins are trying to figure out what is going on.
Everything is back up now.
Sorry for the extended outage. We will will
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 12:07:56 -
"Felix Wang" wrote:
> But I am not in the Fedora packager group yet. So what I am confused
> that what should I do next.
I am not a packager, but I think this might clarify what you need to
do. Maybe an actual packager can give more detail, if it is needed.
Chris Adams wrote:
> Can you stop grinding your axe against a decision you don't agree with?
> You're just "guessing" with zero evidence.
I have also seen zero evidence of the contrary (i.e., that the size change
is *not* significant), which should have been a prerequisite for accepting
the
Hello Pythonistas.
We have released a new version of pyproject-rpm-macros 1.6.2.
The last announcement on this list was for 1.4.0, so let me summarize what's
new since then:
The 1.5.x versions are not very significant. 1.5.0+ now uses the
%py3_test_envvars macro (available on Fedora 38+) in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164242
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Text-BibTeX-0.89-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139132
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120427
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092363
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166725
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
The subpackages command looks interesting, and potentially something I can use
in ebranch!
Can you use rpmdistro-repoquery's repo definitions? That would allow dropping
the embedded repo configs
Cheers,
Michel
___
devel mailing list --
ssmoogen
Current s390x status: Networking and storage on systems is not acting
appropriately. Site admins are trying to figure out what is going on.
On 2/12/23, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 09:30:53PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> On Sat, 2023-02-11 at 10:54 +0100, Dan Horák
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119294
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|spo...@gmail.com|jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168908
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169304
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-aa03acab1e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-aa03acab1e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169304
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168908
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
|ka...@ucw.cz,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168906
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Term-Cap-1.18-1.fc39
But I am not in the Fedora packager group yet. So what I am confused that what
should I do next.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Dear colleagues,
I'm currently working on bringing liboqs [1] to rawhide.
According to [2], I've added the following line to the spec file:
License: MIT and Apache 2.0 and BSD 3-Clause and CC0-1.0 and Unlicense
I doubt about 2 licenses that are enumerated: [3] (BSD-like) and [4].
What am I to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169304
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/51112
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169304
I corrected a license tag in
perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-1.003-27.fc39 from "GPL+ or Artistic" to
"Artistic-2.0 AND (GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl)".
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list --
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 13th
February at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on Matrix or IRC
(Libera.chat). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone
to attend. You can join us over:
Matrix:
Dne 11. 02. 23 v 18:53 Chris Adams napsal(a):
Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler via devel said:
Ben Cotton wrote:
1–3. distribution — {Workstation,Everything,Server} boot x86_64 image
exceeds maximum size — ASSIGNED
Let me guess, this is from the -fno-omit-frame-pointers Change? I have been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158128
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2169304
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169304
Bug ID: 2169304
Summary: Add perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create to EPEL9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169300
Bug ID: 2169300
Summary: Add perl-Clipboard to EPEL9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Clipboard
Assignee: xav...@bachelot.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158128
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2169300
Referenced Bugs:
When updating to SPDX, added Apache-2.0 license for some of the included
files in MLpack.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168906
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
58 matches
Mail list logo
