Re: emacs and libotf.so.0

Hi Denis, On Sunday, 04 September 2011 at 16:59, Denis Arnaud wrote: Hello, I just came onto a tricky dependency issue, and thought it could be of interest to the list. emacs requires libotf.so.0, which is the library handling Open Type Fonts (OTF), provided by the libotf package. Well,

Re: unison formal review

On Thursday, 29 September 2011 at 15:38, Jesse Keating wrote: On Sep 29, 2011, at 1:13 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: One build could produce a package for each version. The packages' n-v-rs could then be maintained independently. I am not sure how bodhi would behave in such a case,

python-fedora update for F-14 brings in additional 57 packages

Hi list, could someone explain why an update in a branch that's supposed to be stable and is nearing EOL requires me to download 14MB worth of additional packages (57 extra dependencies) for a 360KB package? Doesn't this go against our update guidelines? For the record, the installed version is

Re: Orphaning all my packages

On Thursday, 12 August 2010 at 04:19, Ralf Corsepius wrote: [...] I happened to have a full list of all former xulchris owned packages around: [...] cksfv -- Utility to manipulate SFV files Taken. Regards, R. -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion

broken dependencies caused by GNOME bouncing between 3 and 2.x without any advance notice

Dear GNOME maintainers, I would appreciate it if you announced changes that cause broken dependencies. Last month, without any warning, I started getting nagmails about broken dependencies in one of my packages (gnomeradio) in rawhide and F-14. The missing dependency was

Re: broken dependencies caused by GNOME bouncing between 3 and 2.x without any advance notice

Hi Matthias, On Thursday, 19 August 2010 at 16:39, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 16:24 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Dear GNOME maintainers, I would appreciate it if you announced changes that cause broken dependencies. Ah, so you admit to not reading FESCo

Re: broken dependencies caused by GNOME bouncing between 3 and 2.x without any advance notice

On Thursday, 19 August 2010 at 18:26, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 17:18 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Thursday, 19 August 2010 at 16:39, Matthias Clasen wrote: [...] Again, I'm sorry. Maybe it makes you feel better to know that I am feeling the same pain

Re: xulrunner 2.0 in rawhide (F15) bundles several system libs

On Wednesday, 29 September 2010 at 18:29, Chen Lei wrote: 2010/9/29 Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com: There's a new xulrunner/firefox in rawhide. The API (js too) is slightly incompatible with the 1.9.2, there is a new XPCOM modules registration and so on, see:

Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

On Saturday, 27 February 2010 at 16:44, Mike McGrath wrote: On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Mike McGrath wrote: On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote: Chris Adams wrote: IMHO you're developing the wrong distro. It is statements like yours that contribute to the Fedora is a rolling beta

Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

On Sunday, 28 February 2010 at 11:44, Dodji Seketeli wrote: On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 01:23:21AM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Speaking as someone who is still on F11, I want the latest software as long as it doesn't break anything, because most often there are new useful

Re: Bodhi karma feature request

On Monday, 01 March 2010 at 23:34, Doug Ledford wrote: [...] One could argue that the current bodhi karma system is simply too simplistic for real use cases. There's nothing to argue. It's rather obvious. :) Maybe instead of just +1 -1, there should be: Fixes my problem Works for me

Re: Another great update

On Saturday, 06 March 2010 at 18:49, Christoph Wickert wrote: Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 18:17 +0100 schrieb Michał Piotrowski: [...] Because I don't understand the criteria for Fedora package update. Why I can install KDE 4.4 in F11 and I can't install latest gnome? Because the KDE

Re: Proposed udpates policy change

On Monday, 08 March 2010 at 22:59, Matthew Garrett wrote: [...] Proposal The ability for maintainers to flag an update directly into the updates repository will be disabled. Before being added to updates, the package must receive a net karma of +3 in Bodhi. -1 to this. I've

Re: Meeting summary/minutes for 2010-03-09 FESCo meeting

On Wednesday, 10 March 2010 at 16:22, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 13:08 +0100, Till Maas wrote: Afaics this does not affect some minor issue, but a fundamental reason why package maintainer decided to become Fedora package maintainers. No volunteer package maintainer is

Re: Meeting summary/minutes for 2010-03-09 FESCo meeting

On Wednesday, 10 March 2010 at 17:34, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 04:38:53PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: [...] Agreed. However, we should ask ourselves if it's better to have a package in our distribution even if it doesn't fit ideally with the rest

Re: Orphaning kadu

On Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 20:33, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 18.03.2010 10:45, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski pisze: On Thursday, 18 March 2010 at 00:32, Julian Sikorski wrote: [...] I'll try to get it done tomorrow, last time I looked the kadu spec looked very convoluted

orphaning packages and looking for co-maintainers

Dear fellow developers, unfortunately due to lack of time and other reasons, I'm unable to maintain the following packages: ctorrent gnomeradio obexfs obexftp I've orphaned them in F20+, and I'll gladly give them up in F18/19 if anyone steps up. ctorrent/dtorrent's upstream has been dead for over

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-11-14 17:00 UTC)

Hi Christopher, On Thursday, 14 November 2013 at 08:58, Christopher Meng wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 06:39:25AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: Ticket #350 needs 2 votes on final decision. Please consider.

Re: Kernel event library bundling

Hi, Florian. On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 11:38, Florian Weimer wrote: There seems to be a library for processing kernel monitoring events called pevent, libtrace, traceevent etc., which might originally come from the kernel package (and is used there by perf), but is copied at least into

Re: Libint update, recompiles due

Hi Susi, On Sunday, 22 December 2013 at 12:47, Susi Lehtola wrote: FYI, I've changed some configuration parameters in the libint-1.1.5-2 build, which requires all dependent packages to be rebuilt. Because this build addresses some missing functionality, I'm going to push it in older

Re: Fedora 15, new and exciting plans

On Monday, 15 November 2010 at 12:29, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: [...] This is a silly straw-man. No one[1] formats external HDs with anything other than MS-DOS FAT. Fedora changing the default for the main hard disk will not make any difference to this case of your contrarian user giving

HEADS-UP: openbabel ABI version bump in rawhide

Dear fellow maintainers, I'm building a new version of openbabel in rawhide and it comes with an ABI version bump. The affected packages needing a rebuild are: avogadro ghemical gnome-chemistry-utils kdeedu xdrawchem Please don't hesitate to contact me if you encounter any problems. Regards,

Re: Bugzilla is not being nice to me

Hi, On Monday, 13 December 2010 at 23:23, Paul Johnson wrote: Hi, It's been quite a while since I've used the big red lizard and unfortunately, I've lost my password. No problems. Hit the reset button. As expected, it comes up with that it's sent a token to my email address, but nothing

Re: noexec on /dev/shm

Hi, On Monday, 13 December 2010 at 14:37, Karel Zak wrote: On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:49:27PM -0800, John Reiser wrote: How did /dev/shm get noexec in Fedora 15 rawhide? $ grep /dev/shm /proc/mounts tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 $ grep -srl

Re: Which fonts should be pulled in by desktop environments as dependencies?!

On Monday, 28 February 2011 at 19:23, Bill Nottingham wrote: Hedayat Vatankhah (hedayat@gmail.com) said: Is it possible to depend on a group instead of a package at all? No. It is, however, possible to depend on virtual package which may be provided by multiple real packages and will

hplip (hp-plugin) installs binary-only plugins and firmware into system directories without RPM control

Hello Tim et al. Recently, I found out that certain HP devices require binary-only firmware and plugins. Apparently, this is done via hp-setup, which runs hp-plugin to download the actual files from www.openprinting.org and copies them into selected directories under /usr/share/hplip (and puts

Re: hplip (hp-plugin) installs binary-only plugins and firmware into system directories without RPM control

On Wednesday, 16 March 2011 at 06:44, Kevin Kofler wrote: Tim Waugh wrote: HP won't open-source them unfortunately. I think the issue is that the code uses the patented JBIG algorithm. Let's hope it's the only issue. Maybe things will change soon when the last JBIG patent expires. If HP

Re: hplip (hp-plugin) installs binary-only plugins and firmware into system directories without RPM control

On Thursday, 17 March 2011 at 07:48, Kevin Kofler wrote: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Do you mean foo2* packages from RPMFusion? :) I mean a drop-in replacement for the hplip-plugin based on the foo2* code, or even just on jbigkit, depending on how the hplip code is structured

Re: orphan most of my packages

Hi, On Sunday, 10 October 2010 at 18:48, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: Hello, I have no more time to support the following packages in the Fedora. jack-audio-connection-kit -- The Jack Audio Connection Kit I took jack on F-14 and

Re: Can anyone contact Gér ard Milmeister (gemi)?

On Tuesday, 06 July 2010 at 11:53, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:13:40AM +0800, Chen Lei wrote: 2010/6/18 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com: [...] Can we orphan his packages now? I'd like to take scons, I don't think waiting more time will be helpful. According to:

orphaning gg2

Hi all. I'm orphaning GNU Gadu (gg2). I no longer use it (pidgin replaces it quite well), upstream is dead and the project website domain has been taken over. If someone is interested, feel free to pick it up. Otherwise it should probably be dropped before F-14. There are some crasher bugs

Re: headsup for llvm-3.2

On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 12:01, Jens Petersen wrote: There was talk about bringing 3.1 to F17 including some support from the Mesa guys but then nothing actually happened. I would really like it if I could go through F18 without having to build my own private parallel installable

Re: headsup for llvm-3.2

On Wednesday, 13 February 2013 at 15:26, John5342 wrote: On 13 Feb 2013 09:37, Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I spend a little time recently working on the llvm package trying to fix a few Fedora bugs that have been open for a while... I also think we should really get

Re: Self Introduction

On Wednesday, 07 August 2013 at 13:52, Christopher Meng wrote: You shouldn't mention gitlab as it's a GSoC project. What's wrong with mentioning it? Regards, -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org Faith manages. -- Delenn to Lennier in

Re: Unresponsive maintainer - pidgin package

Hi Jan, On Monday, 10 February 2014 at 13:35, Jan Synacek wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: Hello, I've been trying to contact Stu Tomlinson for a while now -- in a bugzilla [1] and by mail. Anybody know how to contact

Re: [Fedora-packaging] May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking

On Friday, 21 February 2014 at 16:08, Alexander Todorov wrote: [...] Guys I can do both. 1) Report packages which *have* test suites but they are *not* executed in %check 2) Report packages which *don't* have any test suites at all. 1) is easy but I'm more interested in 2) Could you

Retiring libnemesi and netembryo

Hello, I've just marked libnemesi and netembryo as retired. There are no dependent packages. The last release was done in 2008, upstream no longer exists (domain expired) and the original author confirmed in a private e-mail that they should be retired. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora

Re: Self Introduction : Marianne Lombard

Hello Marianne, On Thursday, 24 April 2014 at 14:20, Marianne Lombard wrote: Hi, I'm writing today because I have submitted my first package for review : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090933 Welcome on board! I'm a sysadmin since a few years in a public research center and

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

Hi Jochen, On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 15:43, Till Maas wrote: Since the mass rebuild will start in a week (2014-06-06) it is a good time to start cleaning up Fedora. After the mass rebuild, packages that fail to build for two releases will be be added to this list. Since this is the first

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v2

On Wednesday, 11 June 2014 at 18:57, Till Maas wrote: The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

On Wednesday, 25 June 2014 at 11:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 06/23/2014 07:27 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:44:31 -0400, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: I would suggest that the fix for this is to not push broken kernels so frequently that 'the oldest

Review swaps

Would anyone like to swap reviews? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864 elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalue problems This is an optional dependency of cp2k-2.5+ (and comes bundled in cp2k-2.4). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825

Re: Review swaps

Hi Sandro, On Wednesday, 25 June 2014 at 15:50, Sandro Mani wrote: On 25.06.2014 15:33, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Would anyone like to swap reviews? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864 elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalue

Re: PkgDB, pending ACL requests

On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 15:28, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: [...] Today we are at: # Number of requests pending: 5410 So there is some improvements :) From the version 1.16, the page listing all the pending ACLs now provides 'Approve all' and 'Deny all' buttons. So feel free to

Re: Applications not visible in the software center

On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 18:14, Richard Hughes wrote: I've been asked by a few people if I could write a list of all the applications that are not being included in the AppStream metadata for one reason or another. The list of rules we're aiming to share between Suse, Fedora and Debian

ANNOUNCE: Taking over ownership of retired package lazygal

Hello, everyone. I intend to unretire lazygal, a static web gallery generator, which was retired as of F15. Upstream seems to have moved to a different host, but is otherwise active, and current version seems to be working fine. Here's the review request:

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Orphaning packages

On Tuesday, 22 July 2014 at 19:53, Susi Lehtola wrote: Hi, due to relocation to another continent and starting a new job, I have to refocus my reduced time for Fedora on packages that I actively use. Congratulations on the new job! I hope you'll still have some time to keep contributing to

Re: ANNOUNCE: Taking over ownership of retired package lazygal

On Sunday, 20 July 2014 at 22:47, Björn Persson wrote: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: I intend to unretire lazygal, a static web gallery generator, which was retired as of F15. Thank you for working on this. I was planning to unretire Lazygal myself two years ago, but I decided

Open Seats on the Fedora Packaging Committee

The Fedora Packaging Committee has two open seats and is accepting submissions from interested candidates to serve on the FPC. This position involves not only reviewing Packaging Guideline drafts submitted to the FPC for consideration, but also rewriting drafts (sometimes from scratch) to resolve

Re: Broken dependencies in F21 (was: Re: F-21 Branched report: 20141015 changes)

On Thursday, 16 October 2014 at 16:47, Mathieu Bridon wrote: On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 14:40 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: Hi all, We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the maintainers are supposed to

Re: Self Introduction: Piotr Popieluch

Hello, Piotr. On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 00:40, Piotr Popieluch wrote: My name is Piotr Popieluch and live in the Hague in the Netherlands. I work as a Unix sysadmin with focus on monitoring. I manage rhel boxes professionally and use Fedora on my laptop. Because of this I want to give

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-12-11 17:00 - 18:25 UTC)

On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 16:33, Matthias Clasen wrote: I don't think you can really force a package maintainer to provide a static library for code the is very explicitly not meant to be shared. Just because others decided to ignore that wish and copied it anyway. The only outcomes I

OpenBabel rebase to pre-2.4 (current Git master)

Dear fellow packagers, I intend to update openbabel to pre-2.4 (current Git master) in rawhide in a few weeks. For now I'm providing the new builds in copr: http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rathann/openbabel-2.4/ Package owners in Bcc: please check if your packages build against this new

Re: Orphaning freefem++

Dear Fedora Community, I'm orphaning the freefem++ package[1] since I don't have access to anyone that uses it and despite having an active upstream, it's a pain to get it to build with each new release. Also, I can hardly speak French. Nothing seems to depend on freefem++ directly. There are

Re: Orphaning freefem++

Hi, Jason. On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 23:46, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: DM == Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net writes: DM Dear Fedora Community, I'm orphaning the freefem++ package[1] since DM I don't have access to anyone that uses it and despite having an DM

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-5.0.0-0.5.fc22

On Sunday, 08 February 2015 at 18:17, Marek Polacek wrote: [...] The following is a more detailed list of what and why failed. abook-0.6.0-0.15.20140116git5840fce.fc22.src.rpm Fixed. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org Faith

Orphaning iscan-firmware (Firmware for Epson flatbed scanners)

Dear Fedora Community, I'm orphaning the iscan-firmware package since I no longer have even one Epson scanner which would require it. Hopefully someone else with one of the supported scanners can take it. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 - libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

On Monday, 09 March 2015 at 16:06, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет: On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500 Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com wrote: There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in

Re: hibernation support - lack of distro-wide coordination between systemd, dracut, anaconda, pm-utils and maybe more?

On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 11:08, Richard Hughes wrote: On 30 March 2015 at 07:57, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: - provides hibernation support via systemctl hibernate, which is also what pm-hibernate does (why do we have two tools for the same core task?)

Re: Self Introduction: Marcin Haba

Hi, Marcin. On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 04:53, Marcin Haba wrote: Hello, I am going to try join to Fedora packagers. Welcome to the Fedora Community! I created and I develop Baculum tool. It is web interface to Bacula Community services. In RedHat Bugzilla I added Package Review ticket

Re: [Scitech] OpenBabel rebase to pre-2.4 (current Git master)

On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 11:51, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Do we need to tell upstream about these patches? Yes, it's part of maintainer responsibilities. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org Faith manages. --

Re: RFC: Audacious 3.6 build options

Hi, On Sunday, 01 March 2015 at 15:45, Michael Schwendt wrote: Audacious 3.6 has been released. This is another chance for interested people to join and help deciding how to proceed with the Fedora packages. I'm still looking for co-maintainers, too, especially some who have an opinion on

Re: amending the new package process

On Monday, 23 February 2015 at 03:27, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 01/23/2015 04:32 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: My experience with the new package process is that the review process in Step 6 doesn't work. For some of my packages it took 3 months for a reviewer to

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 13:34, Severin Gehwolf wrote: On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:43 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: [...] option one - introducing new packages - preferred 1. main jdk is proclaimed as dead as it was until now. The new jdk is derived as new package

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote: [...] There were several attempts in past like can you please support jdk 7,6...in newer fedoras and we always told no. When come speech about do it on your own suddenly many questions marks raised up. The last open bug is:

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 15:09, Deepak Bhole wrote: * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net [2015-02-24 09:04]: On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote: [...] There were several attempts in past like can you please support jdk 7,6...in newer

Re: Orphaned packages up for new point of contact

On Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 20:48, Kevin Fenzi wrote: The following packages had their point of contact changed to orphan based on: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1417 [...] arpack -- Fortran 77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems ( master f22 f21 f20 )

Re: [Scitech] OpenBabel rebase to pre-2.4 (current Git master)

Dear packagers, On Sunday, 08 February 2015 at 01:06, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: I intend to update openbabel to pre-2.4 (current Git master) in rawhide in a few weeks. This has now landed in rawhide only. I tried rebuilding all packages that have a build dependency on openbabel. I

Re: [Scitech] OpenBabel rebase to pre-2.4 (current Git master)

On Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 18:03, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net wrote: Affected packages: IQmol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196090 avogadro https://bugzilla.redhat.com

Re: New pugixml 1.6 coming to rawhide

On Saturday, 11 April 2015 at 16:58, Richard Shaw wrote: There doesn't appear to be any significant API/ABI change but the soname was bumped so rebuilds will be necessary. Here's what I could find on my f21 system: $ repoquery --whatrequires libpugixml.so.1.0()(64bit) [...]

Re: Continuous integration for Fedora

On Thursday, 09 April 2015 at 13:18, Remi Collet wrote: Le 09/04/2015 12:41, Mikolaj Izdebski a écrit : Koschei [1] can be used to rebuild package after dependency change or time elapse. Koschei runs tests enabled during package build. Among other thing, Koschei is already used to monitor

Re: Packaging rust-lang

On Wednesday, 29 April 2015 at 19:15, Josh Stone wrote: On 04/27/2015 02:35 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote: Hey, there is some interest (the interested people are BCC'ed) in packaging [Rust](http://www.rust-lang.org). The packaging request is tracked here: Bug 915043 - Package rust (lang)

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F22 tree

On Tuesday, 28 April 2015 at 00:45, Kalev Lember wrote: Hi all, In two weeks we will be entering the F22 Final Freeze. At that point, Fedora release engineering retires any packages that still have broken dependencies in the F22 tree. Based on today's Branched report [1], we still have a

Re: How to specify explicit requires on library

Hi, On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 00:10, Sandro Mani wrote: [...] I was about to file a bug suggesting # Major digit of the proj so version %global proj_somaj 9 [...] # proj DL-opened in ogrct.cpp, see also fix in %%prep Requires: libproj.so.%{proj_somaj} [...] sed -i

Re: DNF vs YUM, $pkg, $pkg-mpi, $pkg-openmpi having same provides

On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 01:10, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: [...] You should instead use the new depdendency generator hooks, which are also quite a bit nicer to work with. All you have to do is create a file %{_rpmconfigdir}/fileattrs/openmpi.attrs with something like: # the path to your

JavaScript SIG?

Hello, is there a JavaScript SIG or a mailing list? I've been forced to package several JavaScript code/libraries and I have some questions. However, I couldn't find any trace of a JavaScript SIG or a mailing list. Is there anyone interested in creating/joining one? Regards, Dominik -- Fedora

Re: Fedora 23 mass rebuild

Hi, Dennis. On Tuesday, 16 June 2015 at 23:00, Dennis Gilmore wrote: Hi all, Per the Fedora 23 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for Fedora 23 very shortly. It was requested in a trac ticket[2] that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 23 for

Re: New implementation of pthread condition variables in rawhide

On Friday, 22 May 2015 at 06:57, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: Hi, The latest glibc in rawhide (2.21.90-13.fc23) has a new implementation for pthread condition variable functions (pthread_cond_wait, pthread_cond_timedwait, etc.). If you experience any weird locking issues or bugs that can be

Re: InsightToolkit fails to build on rawhide due to missing SSE instructions

On Friday, 22 May 2015 at 05:39, Orion Poplawski wrote: [...] Well, the errors are possibly related to that type of code: In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/5.1.1/include/xmmintrin.h:31:0, from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/5.1.1/include/emmintrin.h:31,

Re: InsightToolkit fails to build on rawhide due to missing SSE instructions

On Thursday, 21 May 2015 at 17:06, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 13:21:19 +0200, Sebastian Pölsterl s...@k-d-w.org wrote: I'm currently struggling to get InsightToolkit to build again for rawhide. Currently, the problem is that it cannot detect SSE instructions when using

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 19:39, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:01:24 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: maybe you should have read the link below becaus ethen maybe you would not accuse him about his attitude - there is a lot of activity and fast respones - what else should

Re: [HEADS UP] rpm-4.12.90 in rawhide

On Saturday, 25 July 2015 at 13:31, Remi Collet wrote: Le 25/07/2015 13:20, Florian Festi a écrit : On 07/25/2015 11:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote: Thanks for catching that! Do you want me to file a bug ? Yes, please! FYI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246743 It

Re: [PATCH] Update to 2.0.2

On Sunday, 02 August 2015 at 22:21, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Dudes, I don't have time sometimes to report problems to bugzilla, attach patches there. I just wanted to help. If you think it's useless (I don't think so) -- I will not contribute at all. It's much less useful sending patches to the

Re: Boost updated to 1.58.0 in rawhide and f23

On Thursday, 23 July 2015 at 19:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 23/07/15 14:27 +0200, David Tardon wrote: Hi, On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email me or ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is 'redi') and

Orphaning vaspview

Hello, everyone! I've just orphaned vaspview (f23+ only). It's been a very low maintenance package so far, even though upstream made no releases since the package entered Fedora. However, it's FTBFS with latest gcc recently and I've been unable to fix it myself. I don't use it and I have no

Re: Review swap

Hi, On Saturday, 25 July 2015 at 05:46, Eduardo Mayorga Téllez wrote: [...] I need to push three node packages so I'm willing to swap reviews for these: [...] nodejs-flot: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246721 I need this one to unbundle flot from one of my upcoming packages, so

Re: Self Introduction: Beat Küng

Hello! On Monday, 20 July 2015 at 07:58, Beat Küng wrote: [...] I've been a Fedora user for a while now, and I'm looking forward to be part of the Fedora project and contribute to it! Welcome! It seems that many follow this path. We're looking forward to your contributions! Regards, Dominik

Re: Heads Up: New pugixml coming to rawhide

On Monday, 19 October 2015 at 21:30, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < > domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > > > Feel free to bump mkvtoolnix. I'm planning an update to 8.5.0, > > but I don't know if I'll be able to do

Re: BuildRequires: pythonN-devel unnecessary

On Thursday, 29 October 2015 at 01:31, Christopher Meng wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:16 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: > > > > On 28/10/15 19:12, Mike Bonnet wrote: > >> > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires > >> > >> This is *not* required for pure

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

On Thursday, 29 October 2015 at 15:00, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 29.10.2015 v 13:24 Honza Šilhan napsal(a): > > You can exclude the conflicting packages to proceed the system-upgrade i.e.: > > "dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync -x > > rubygem-celluloid --allowerasing" > >

Re: Naming ANTs

On Monday, 02 November 2015 at 11:31, Ian Malone wrote: > On 2 November 2015 at 09:14, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I'm working on bringing libraries/tools for neuroscience and neuroimaging > > into Fedora[0]. Now I'm packaging ANTs[1] (Advanced

Re: Heads Up: New pugixml coming to rawhide

Hi! On Monday, 19 October 2015 at 20:46, Richard Shaw wrote: > In the next couple of days I'll be doing an update of pugixml in rawhide. Thanks for the heads-up. > The affected packages seem to be: > > # repoquery --qf=%{name} --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --source >

Heads Up: New arpack coming to rawhide

Dear maintainers, I've just updated arpack to 3.3.0 in rawhide. There are two removed symbols compared to the latest version in rawhide (3.1.5), but none of the consumers seem to link against them so it should be safe. $ rpmsodiff arpack-3.1.5-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-10-07)

On Wednesday, 07 October 2015 at 21:17, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Meeting summary > --- [...] > * #1483 Decision on bundling policy in the Fedora Package Collection > (sgallagh, 18:11:40) > * LINK: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/276064/44243383/ is sgallaghs > proposal without

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-10-07)

On Friday, 09 October 2015 at 00:14, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > On 10/08/2015 08:48 AM, Haïkel wrote: > [snip] > >Please keep in mind, that Fesco is aware this is not a perfect > >solution, and we''ll gladly review any proposals to improve this > >policy. But we can keep discussing this for years,

Re: Firefox addon signing

On Friday, 28 August 2015 at 11:24, Martin Stransky wrote: On 08/28/2015 11:00 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: Can we ship addons which are already signed by Mozilla? Or does Fedora packager modify them somehow?

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Monday, 14 September 2015 at 13:56, Haïkel wrote: > 2015-09-14 13:17 GMT+02:00 Andrew Haley : > > On 09/13/2015 09:23 PM, Haïkel wrote: > >> I'm not speaking about PHP, most of the upstream I deal with > >> are python developers. Bad habits are rather spreading than > >>

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Monday, 14 September 2015 at 21:35, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:38:55PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > New bundling exception could be granted automatically in cases where: > > * the bundled code is not packaged in Fedora yet >

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Hi, On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 21:27, Haïkel wrote: [...] > I'll just point out that a non-negligible part of Fedora packages already > bundle libraries. Unless we want to mass-review and ban all those packages, > I consider that Stephen's proposal to be an *improvement* to the current >

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Wednesday, 30 September 2015 at 14:35, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Just to circle around here (in case people don't read my reply to the > FESCo meeting agenda), I'm making the following revised proposal[1] to > FESCo which may or may not be discussed at today's meeting (given that > it was

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >