OpenCV update to 2.3.1 (ABI change).

Hello, I've to updated opencv to 2.3.1 in f16 and rawhide today. This will involve an ABI change so a rebuild of the dependent packages are needed: player kipi-plugins libkface gstreamer-plugin-bad-extras mrpt fawkes player I've submitted a build override that should be available in 20minutes

Re: OpenCV update to 2.3.1 (ABI change).

2011/8/21 Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com: Hello, I've to updated opencv to 2.3.1 in f16 and rawhide today. This will involve an ABI change so a rebuild of the dependent packages are needed: player kipi-plugins libkface gstreamer-plugin-bad-extras mrpt fawkes player I've submitted

Re: Responsibility for rebuilding dependent components, was: F-16 Branched report: 20110920 changes

2011/9/20 Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com: On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 13:53 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote: What's wrong with all that broken deps? Is this just a missing rebuild against opencv and other libs or what's the reason for all this mess. I mean the release of F16 is not that far away and the

Re: Responsibility for rebuilding dependent components, was: F-16 Branched report: 20110920 changes

2011/9/20 Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net: ... thus we have bodhi and updates-testing as a gateway to get into the release. It's a gateway, I just don't think it serves as useful a purpose as it was intended to. The question though really is whether or not it is more useful than a

Re: Sourcing one spec from another permissible?

2011/10/17 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com: NOTE (just for Jon :): This is for RPM Fusion but the question is a technical one. I'm looking at packaging zfs for Fedora (via RPM Fusion) and it has a single source package but contains two spec files. One for the utilities

[perl-ExtUtils-CChecker/el6/master] (5 commits) ...Initial pseudo merge for dist-git setup

Summary of changes: edeb30b... Initial import (*) e2dfdbf... Rebuilt (*) 8c1f9cb... dist-git conversion (*) 84619c7... Update to 0.04 (*) 1860b18... Initial pseudo merge for dist-git setup (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl

[perl-ExtUtils-CChecker/el6/master: 5/5] Initial pseudo merge for dist-git setup

commit 1860b18bbaabd07e7adf883a432f7b9c7b67de5e Merge: 84619c7 bd6c025 Author: Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com Date: Mon Aug 23 19:36:36 2010 +0200 Initial pseudo merge for dist-git setup --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing

[perl-AnyEvent/el6/master: 9/9] Initial pseudo merge for dist-git setup

commit ca171970a195d247807b3f568aa4e3ca8539db9a Merge: d6cf610 9c9084e Author: Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com Date: Mon Aug 23 19:40:03 2010 +0200 Initial pseudo merge for dist-git setup --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing

[perl-AnyEvent/el6/master] (9 commits) ...Initial pseudo merge for dist-git setup

Summary of changes: 49e81d5... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) 410c059... - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 (*) 76d126a... Update to 5.22 (*) d2ce085... - Update to 5.24 (rpm version : 5.24) (*) 515d1f9... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*) 5705e7c... -

Re: Samsung RF-511 wpa_supplicant crashes under kernel 3.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64

2012/10/16 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com: ... wpa_supplicant crashes during boot. Hardware: Samsung RF-511 Intel Core i5. Broadcom WiFi. Bug deactivates even eth0 System becomes unusable. Yeah I'm getting this oops as well but have had difficulty extracting any information from the

Re: Samsung RF-511 wpa_supplicant crashes under kernel 3.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64

2012/10/16 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com: On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 15:05 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: On Oct 16, 2012, at 12:13 PM, Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote: People developing kernel, I got a blocker bug at: Kernel: 3.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64 wpa_supplicant crashes during boot.

Re: Samsung RF-511 wpa_supplicant crashes under kernel 3.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64

bug. Got it. On Oct 16, 2012, at 3:29 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Are you really required to use broadcom-wl or is it a bad habit? Using it is a bad habit, or reporting it here is a bad habit? I'd say neither. a.) I tend not to report such things here, hence not a habit; and b.) if I don't

Re: [rhn-client-tools] Created tag rhn-client-tools-1.8.26-1.fc19

Hi Miroslav, It sounds like you are missing f18 branch while creating new build Thx for the new spacewalk release! Nicolas (kwizart) 2012/11/2 Miroslav Suchý msu...@fedoraproject.org The unsigned tag 'rhn-client-tools-1.8.26-1.fc19' was created. Tagger: Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com

Re: kmod-nvidia-3.6.10?

2012/12/20 Charles Bennett c...@acm.org Thanks for the redirect. I've taken it to the rpmfusion folks. ccb Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Jiri Moskovcak wrote: - not sure if this is the right ml It's not. ;-) kmod-nvidia is definitely not in the official Fedora repos,

Who broke opencv ? (was Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 12 + updates-testing - 2010-03-01)

Why opencv has experienced broken dependency at first step ? I've miss the required announcement, and even if it was announced, it would have be stroken by a denial from my side! That kind of development is unappropriate in a stable release. Nicolas (kwizart) 2010/3/1 Haïkel Guémar

libproxy addition to comps for F-13

Hi, I would like to discuss the possibility to add the patch described in this report in comps for F-13 and later. https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3565 The basic idea is to make libproxy default installed plugins more in shape with the actual set of installed packages for a given system.

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Packages depending on retired packages

2013/8/29 Till Maas opensou...@till.name On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:53:53PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: Package(co)maintainers === directfb orphan, kwizart tslib

Release Ownership for oyranos

Hi, I've released ownership for oyranos which currently FTBFS in f20. I will not have time to fix in the f20 time frame, so it might be blocked or even retired if none volunteer to maintain it. There will be a need to update elektra first, then if one in interested in this package, libXcm and

Re: New maintainer for lirc/Jarod Wilson's packages

2013/10/1 Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com - Original Message - Hi, Jarod Wilson, the current lirc maintainer, announced that he wants someone else to maintain lirc due to lack of time/interest[0]. Probably his other four packages need a new maintainer as, well[1]:

Re: What is support status of PowerVR GPUs in Fedora? (Intel D2500 and gma500_gfx)

2013/11/15 valent.turko...@gmail.com valent.turko...@gmail.com Thank you all for great feedback, I found these awesome online resources for gma500_gfx - https://gist.github.com/Aissen/2925633 https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Poulsbo

Re: Broken dependency for RHEL6

2010/12/20 Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com: On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:31:16 -0200 Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote: That is the problem. python-lirc has never been built for RHEL. I know it works because I built

ABI break for OpenCV 2.2 update

Hello, There is an ABI breakage with OpenCV 2.2 update. Actually it is more a rename (1) , so as soon as your package rely on pkgconfig or opencv.cmake, thats should be silent. Here is a koji --scratch build for dist-rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2704279 The packages

Re: [tomcat6/f14/master] resolves: rhbz# 669969. Logging directory was hardcoded in conf file to /var/log/tomcat6. We are now

2011/1/17 Dave Knox dk...@fedoraproject.org: commit efafec286e73c4ca55903b44825a670b4a1bfe61 Author: david knox dk...@78-97-42-72.skybeam.com Date:   Mon Jan 17 11:24:02 2011 -0700    resolves: rhbz# 669969. Logging directory was hardcoded in conf file to /var/log/tomcat6. We are now using

Re: Is boost 1.46.1 in rawhide for real?

2011/4/6 Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com: Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes: I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in

Re: Best Practice to revert a version on F-15

2011/4/6 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo, I'm planing to revert the version of blender in the F-15 repository from 2.56 to 2.49. The reseaon is, that there are several packages depending on blender which are not compatible to

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (v3)

2011/7/14 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com: Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages. It's that time again for Fedora 16. Orphan me-tv I've just took me-tv on pkgdb Nicolas (kwizart) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)

2011/7/20 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com: Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages. It's that time again for Fedora 16. New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have failed to build since before Fedora 14. The following packages are

matio ABI change

Hi, Is it possible for a provenpackager to bump alsa-plugins to release 3 in f17 and later and submit an update. This is a trivial fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806218 Thx Nicolas (kwizart) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: matio ABI change

2012/4/22 Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com: Hi, Is it possible for a provenpackager to bump alsa-plugins to release 3 in f17 and later and submit an update. This is a trivial fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806218 Thx Nicolas (kwizart) Sorry, there was a misstake

[perl-AnyEvent] Fix provides

commit 3349c0f34bf8f07b5aa60e4429a2d21d81bc89af Author: Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com Date: Mon Apr 23 21:55:20 2012 +0200 Fix provides perl-AnyEvent.spec |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-AnyEvent.spec b/perl-AnyEvent.spec index

[perl-AnyEvent] Disable SSL test

commit e58dcc0ba811fc69b59dbd9efca083f806f2d08b Author: Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com Date: Mon Apr 23 22:04:27 2012 +0200 Disable SSL test perl-AnyEvent.spec |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-AnyEvent.spec b/perl-AnyEvent.spec index

matio ABI bump and license change to BSD

) -- Forwarded message -- From: Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com Date: 2012/4/22 Subject: matio ABI bump To: nip2-ow...@fedoraproject.org, scilab-ow...@fedoraproject.org, vips-ow...@fedoraproject.org Hi, I'm preparing a matio update to 1.5.0. This involve an ABI change. I've

Re: hdf5 1.8.9 build for f18

2012/5/15 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com: I'm updating hdf5 in f18 to 1.8.9 today.  A simple rebuild of dependent packages is all that should be needed.  I'll be doing most of them. cgnslib Field3D gdal gdl grads h5py hdf5 jhdf5 mathgl ncl netcdf octave OpenImageIO paraview

Re: x32 abi support?

2012/5/16 Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com: On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote: I noticed this article: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTEwMTk Has this been discussed on fedora? Not that I've seen.  Also, the article is either incomplete

Reporting a bug on several components - rpath issue

Hi, I was trying to check if packages on my system has defined a rpath (1) , I've made a little script: # for f in $(ls /usr/lib64/*.so.* ) ; do chrpath ${f} /dev/null; RETVAL=$?; if [ ! $RETVAL == 2 ] ; then chrpath ${f} ; rpm -qf ${f} ; echo ; fi; done This script reported around 70 rpath

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

2012/7/6 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com: .. Package libcrystalhd (fails to build) comaintained by: kwizart I have a fix ready for primary arch, but I still need to do more runtime test. Also I've requested to be in ACL, but stil in awaiting state. Hopefully I will submit the patch

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18

2012/7/31 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these

Re: Changing kernel API / Breaking VirtualBox - update criteria violation?

2011/12/8 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net: Am 08.12.2011 17:04, schrieb Kevin Kofler: Reindl Harald wrote: my only changes was compile the x264.119 and fake the so-number in the sources to .102 for F13/F14 and to .114/.115 for F15 and currently the .120 to 115 Changing soversions is

Re: License change in LibRaw due to inclusion of demosaic packs

2011/12/9 Siddhesh Poyarekar spoya...@redhat.com: Hi, I got a request to include demosaic packs into the LibRaw build to support some digital cameras: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760638 With this inclusion, the LibRaw package will have a GPLv3+ license since the demosaic

[perl-Devel-Refcount] Add new BR

commit b3fa6bcdd5b2eaecb425801f7cdfe06f6d0b1d08 Author: Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com Date: Tue Jan 17 14:42:59 2012 +0100 Add new BR perl-Devel-Refcount.spec |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Devel-Refcount.spec b/perl-Devel

Re: F17 proposal - prerelease version name changes

2012/1/25 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com: Hi, Microsoft has changed the way of prerelease version naming Alpha - Developer Preview Beta - Consumer Preview Release Candidate - Enterprise (or Business) Preview http://www.neowin.net/news/windows-8-beta-may-be-called-the-consumer-preview

Re: While we're talking about RPM dependencies ...

2012/4/6 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com: On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 08:21:15PM +0200, drago01 wrote: On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: Today when using F17 Alpha, I ran qemu and got an error which was something like:  qemu-kvm: undefined

Re: F17: gcc not usable without glibc-devel.x86_64 -- %{?_isa}, again?

2012/4/12 Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net: I built another x86_64 rawhide VM yesterday and was surprised to find that its gcc was unusable:    $ printf 'int main(){return 0;}' k.c; gcc k.c    /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../libc.so when

rpms/perl-IO-Async/F-13 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 perl-IO-Async.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.3, 1.4

: Development/Libraries @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Mon Apr 19 2010 Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@fedoraproject.org - 0.28-1 +- Update to 0.28 + * Mon Dec 7 2009 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com - 0.23-2 - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 Index: sources

rpms/perl-IO-Async/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 perl-IO-Async.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.3, 1.4

: Development/Libraries @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Mon Apr 19 2010 Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@fedoraproject.org - 0.28-1 +- Update to 0.28 + * Mon Dec 7 2009 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com - 0.23-2 - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 Index: sources

Re: Some Ideas About Fedora 14 Media

2010/4/28 Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com: Hi, all. Fedora 13 Desktop Spin would target to 1GB LiveDVD. But at last desktop team decided to return to 700MB CD size. It means that we should give up OpenOffice.org and GIMP by default. It looks quite sad. Looking at BrOffice.org, I seem to

rpms/perl-Socket-GetAddrInfo/devel perl-Socket-GetAddrInfo.spec, 1.5, 1.6

) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) @@ -60,8 +61,8 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog -* Fri May 07 2010 Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@fedoraproject.org - 0.15-3 -- Rebuilt with perl(ExtUtils::CBuilder) +* Fri May 07 2010 Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@fedoraproject.org - 0.15-4 +- Rebuilt with perl

Re: libproxy bundles libmodman, upstream splits into two projects. what now?

2010/6/17 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org: Presently, libproxy bundles libmodman and includes it in the package. Upstream split libmodman into a separate tarball, and then set up libproxy to build off of a system version of libmodman if it exists (otherwise it uses the version that is bundled

Re: gethostbyname() and resolv.conf updates

2010/6/17 Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org: Hello, xchat in Fedora needs to be restarted after switching to a different nameserver or it fails to resolve. The xchat developers say that all xchat does is call gethostbyname(). A There was a topic 3 years ago about replacing gethostby*

rpms/perl-ExtUtils-CChecker/devel perl-ExtUtils-CChecker.spec, 1.1, 1.2

/Libraries @@ -50,5 +50,8 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue Jun 22 2010 Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com - 0.03-2 +- rebuilt for perl + * Mon Apr 19 2010 Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@fedoraproject.org - 0.03-1 - Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78. -- Fedora Extras Perl

Re: Orphaning em8300 related stuff

2013/2/14 Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org Hi there, I'm orphaning em8300 in Fedora and em8300-kmod in RPMFusion This package was already orphaned in RPM Fusion actually. (do not build with current v4l2 only kernel IIRC). Thx Nicolas (kwizart) -- devel mailing list

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

2013/4/29 Eugene Pivnev ti.eug...@gmail.com As pcmafm developer said - gvfm use gobject - but not gtk or gnome libs. I showed only packages that I was surprised. E.g. ffmpeg requires gtk. Very nice. It's probably because of opencv, It can probably be spitted carefully at runtime, but

Re: audacity

audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion. I'm about to kick it out of the later repository. Nicolas (kwizart) 2013/4/28 Richard Vickery richard.vicker...@gmail.com For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important

Re: [coreutils] require glibc-devel to prevent broken links in coreutils info manual (#959697)

2013/5/17 Ondrej Vasik ova...@fedoraproject.org commit ed5396d91e0032fa7cbfd6cb0bde3d7850aba790 Author: Ondřej Vašík ova...@redhat.com Date: Fri May 17 09:21:51 2013 +0200 require glibc-devel to prevent broken links in coreutils info manual (#959697) I don't think having glibc-devel

Re: [coreutils] require glibc-devel to prevent broken links in coreutils info manual (#959697)

2013/5/17 Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com - Original Message - 2013/5/17 Ondrej Vasik ova...@fedoraproject.org commit ed5396d91e0032fa7cbfd6cb0bde3d7850aba790 Author: Ondřej Vašík ova...@redhat.com Date: Fri May 17 09:21:51 2013 +0200 require glibc-devel to prevent

Re: Fixing proxy support in Fedora (was Re: Orphaning few packages)

2013/7/18 David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 01:19 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:55 PM, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote: On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 12:08 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: libproxy taken. I'm also very interested

Re: [SDL/f19] (2 commits) ...Add NAS support

2013/7/26 Petr Pisar ppi...@fedoraproject.org Summary of changes: 63275df... Add esound and arts BRs (*) 43ee9b2... Add NAS support (*) Do we really need to re-enable thoses deprecated sound server ? I guess no Nicolas (kwizart) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [SDL/f19] (2 commits) ...Add NAS support

2013/7/26 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 02:45:06PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2013/7/26 Petr Pisar ppi...@fedoraproject.org Summary of changes: 63275df... Add esound and arts BRs (*) 43ee9b2... Add NAS support (*) Do we really need

Fwd: Ophaning lcms(1)

Hello, I'm orphaning lcms, this package has seen few security issue and upstream claim it's deprecated over lcms2 rhel 7 doesn't depends on it for the few package, so it might be an option not to build lcms support for certain package # repoquery --whatrequires liblcms.so.1 --source

Re: [HEADS UP] Bump mesa to 10.3.2 for F20

Le 29 oct. 2014 09:39, Igor Gnatenko ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org a écrit : Hi, I'm planning update mesa in F20 to 10.3.2. Probably I'll broke some packages, let's rebuild ... This is a good idea by itself. But this might have a dependency on a newer llvm and there is a libxatracker

Re: Best way to use zram in Fedora 21?

systemd or else ? On my installed workstation system, I can remove anaconda that is now undeeded but I would like to keep zram.service installed. Thx for your answear. Nicolas Chauvet -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code

Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root

2015-01-15 20:18 GMT+01:00 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com: On 01/15/2015 04:20 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/14/2015 03:10 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 01/12/2015 06:08 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dear Fedora developers, I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e.

Re: Heads Up: New pugixml coming to rawhide

2015-10-19 20:46 GMT+02:00 Richard Shaw : > In the next couple of days I'll be doing an update of pugixml in rawhide. > The affected packages seem to be: > > # repoquery --qf=%{name} --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --source > "libpugixml.so.1()(64bit)" >

Re: kmods and Fedora

2016-01-14 18:05 GMT+01:00 Neal Gompa : > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Reindl Harald > wrote: > > > > Am 14.01.2016 um 16:56 schrieb Neal Gompa: > >> > >> I've recently been wondering why we haven't allowed kernel module > >> packages in Fedora

Re: Fixing kmodtool / dropping kmodtool from redhat-rpm-config

2017-02-13 9:29 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede : > Hi all, > > redhat-rpm-config in Fedora still contains an ancient copy of kmodtool > back from the days when Fedora allowed kmods directly into the main > Fedora repo, rather then only allowing them in 3th party repositories. > >

Re: what happened with rawhide/i386

2016-09-27 14:33 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto : > Hi, > I'm getting errors when build in i386 of rawhide and check that master > and mirror haven't i386 [1] had I missing something ? , this is a bug > or a feature ? > > [1]

Re: crypto-policies not very useful, FUTURE too strict?

2016-12-17 16:19 GMT+01:00 Tomasz Torcz : > Hi, > > Since few release we have nifty, consolidated way to select system-wide > crypto > policy. It's great, but granularity of selection is little lacking. We have > basically two sensible choices: > - DEFAULT, which is, well,

Re: libglvnd review request, reviewer needed

2017-01-13 16:56 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>: > Hi, > > On 01/12/2017 11:24 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> >> 2017-01-12 19:04 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>>

Re: libglvnd review request, reviewer needed

2017-01-12 19:04 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede : > Hi All, > > I've just submitted a pkg review request for libglvnd: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412764 > > This is the last building block needed to allow full > parallel installation of the nvidia binary driver

Re: samba client broken in rawhide?

2016-12-06 12:39 GMT+01:00 James Hogarth : > I'm trying to build the owncloud 9.1.1 update but in rawhide mock is > failing with: > > Error: nothing provides libldb.so.1(LDB_0.9.10)(64bit) needed by > samba-client-libs-2:4.5.1-1.fc26.x86_64 > > Was there a SO bump that

Re: ENOTIME

2017-07-20 17:04 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski : > My workload at $dayjob$ has increased significantly so I'm afraid I have much > less time to devote to packaging work. Now more than ever I could use help > maintaining my packages (listed below). If you are interested, please

Re: Kernel 4.13 rebase plans

2017-09-22 20:46 GMT+02:00 : > Oh boy. :) > > Does anyone know if the fallback is working properly? Because if so, then Just restoring the fact here, because despite the fallback idea is hans/WG the implementation is "RPM Fusion Community" original works. (1) So yet as soon

Re: Can't upgrade to Fedora 27 via dnf system-upgrade

2017-08-30 19:01 GMT+02:00 Heiko Adams : > Hi, > it seems the upgrade path to Fedora 27 via dnf system-upgrade is > currently broken. Everytime I try to upgrade I get the following > errors: There are lot of different errors, but for what rpmfusion is concerned, you should

Re: Splitting AppStream data into Workstation/Server

2017-09-04 19:20 GMT+02:00 Richard Hughes : > On 4 September 2017 at 17:56, Neal Gompa wrote: >> It sounds like it would make more sense for createrepo_c to link to >> the AppStream builder library to handle AppStream metadata processing >> as part of the

Re: getting kernel-devel added

2017-09-12 17:35 GMT+02:00 Ben Williams : > hello > > This is an issue i am seeing with new users: > > I was at a University installfest this weekend and this was the major issues > for Endusers. > > case A) Students are using Fedora on windows in a VM (Vbox in this case) for

Fedora 27 is here

Hi, Just want to say welcome to Fedora 27 ! The RPM Fusion repository is ready to server f27 content in time for the release. However, there are few packages that were broken in the process. The ones I'm aware are currently fixed and been pushed in the updates repos. I plan to fixup the GA repo

Re: Fedora 27 is here

2017-11-15 23:02 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Chauvet <kwiz...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > Just want to say welcome to Fedora 27 ! > > The RPM Fusion repository is ready to server f27 content in time for > the release. However, there are few packages that were broken in the >

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

2017-12-06 10:26 GMT+01:00 Matthias Runge : > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 09:56:28AM +0100, Lumir Balhar wrote: >> On 12/05/2017 04:27 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> > Maybe a Fedora Change coordinating this would be nice? > > probably a good idea. > >> > Those are packages that

Re: Django 2.0 released, and what it means to you

2017-12-12 16:17 GMT+01:00 Miro Hrončok : > On 7.12.2017 10:56, Matthias Runge wrote: >> >> To follow-up on this, I'm drafting a change[1]. Since my >> responsibilities changed, this has a quite low priority for me. >> Any help is greatly appreciated! >> >> Best, >> Matthias

Re: Pulling in rpmfusion appstream data with weak dependencies?

2018-01-18 20:21 GMT+01:00 Neal Gompa : > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 01:02:49PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>> The only way to really do this would be to make rpmfusion-release >>> require it.

Re: Pulling in rpmfusion appstream data with weak dependencies?

2018-01-18 20:02 GMT+01:00 Dennis Gilmore : > The only way to really do this would be to make rpmfusion-release > require it. However that will mean users have to download and install > two packages to make it all work. That may break things for people who > intentionally remove

Update to VA-API 1.0.0 (libva-2.0.0 with SONAME bump)

Hi, I plan to update libva to 2.0.0. It comes with a SONAME bump. (and libva-egl and libva-tpi library removed, but it's not used anywhere) Because of the SONAME, this is fedora 28 only material. Here is the full list of dependencies to be rebuilt: dnf repoquery --whatrequires libva.so.1\*

"libcryptopp update to 6.1.0 with ABI change"

Hi, I plan to update cryptopp to 6.1.0 release for f28+ later today. This will not change the ABI number, because our package was previously patched with a forged SONAME to only use the one number convention (aka libcryptopp.so.6 instead of libcryptopp.so.6.0). The good news, is that upstream

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: VA-API 1.0.0

A-API 1.0.0 = >> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/VA-API_1.0.0 >> > >> > Change owner(s): >> > * Nicolas Chauvet >> > >> > This change is about upgrading libva and others to version 2.0. This >> > change affects several multimedia p

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump for libssh

Le ven. 17 août 2018 à 16:05, Michael Cronenworth a écrit : > > The libssh package uses wildcards on SONAME version. The package was upgraded > from > 0.7.5 to 0.8.1 in Fedora 27+ that included a SONAME bump. I don't see any SONAME bump libssh.so.4 is still used in both packages version in f28

Fwd: Soname break for glew

I'm preparing an update for glew to 2.1.0 (with soname bump) (pushed in rawhide but not built yet). https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29087244 Given that the freeze break is next week, I will push the update in rawhide, then in f29 next. Here are the dependencies:

Re: Fedora crda To wireless-regdb Upgrade

2018-07-20 20:47 GMT+02:00 John W. Linville : [...] > QUESTIONS > > Are there reasons to oppose the Obsolete/Provides upgrade path from > crda to wireless-regdb? Would it be desirable to require users to > manually intervene by installing wireless-regdb by hand? FWIW, I do not > see any benefit

Re: libcdio soname bump in rawhide

2018-01-19 9:15 GMT+01:00 Adrian Reber <adr...@lisas.de>: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:50:16AM +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> 2018-01-18 22:25 GMT+01:00 Adrian Reber <adr...@lisas.de>: >> > libcdio upstream released the 2.0 version a few weeks ago and I will >

Re: libcdio soname bump in rawhide

2018-01-18 22:25 GMT+01:00 Adrian Reber : > libcdio upstream released the 2.0 version a few weeks ago and I will > updated rawhide to the latest libcdio version. It comes with a new > soname and I will also rebuild all dependencies. Hi Adrian, Can you wait a week at least ? We

libupnp ABI change notice

Hi, I plan to update libupnp to 1.8.3 which comes with an ABI bump. The libthreadutil library is also dropped in this new release. I will rebuild the dependent applications f29 scratch build https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26339066 On a side note, I've also updated the

Re: RFC: make fedora-release archful and add some provides

Le ven. 14 déc. 2018 à 20:34, Igor Gnatenko a écrit : > > Hello folks, > > for long time we have problem if you have some arch-specific > BuildRequires, you still get one src.rpm from one of arches (not sure > how koji chooses that one) which might not work for your architecture. > > For example

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

Le jeu. 28 févr. 2019 à 10:23, Miroslav Suchý a écrit : > > Do you want to make Fedora 30 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > sudo dnf --releasever=30 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync As the issue was raised

Re: /etc/yum.repos.d -> /etc/distro.repos.d

Le mer. 13 mars 2019 à 13:39, Miroslav Suchý a écrit : > > Hi, > I am curious whether we can move our repo files from > /etc/yum.repos.d > to > /etc/distro.repos.d I don't see the point to "change" this directory for "pleasure" if it doesn't come with more features. Right now yum.repos.d

Re: Fixing Wireguard spec file

Le mar. 29 janv. 2019 à 16:33, Germano Massullo a écrit : > > This [1] is the Wireguard spec file from upstream Copr repo [2]. > Wireguard will be included in kernel 5.0, but meanwhile we are using it as > dkms. There is a wireguard package maintained by Robert-André Mauchin on RPM Fusion that

Re: glibc-arm-linux-gnu help

Le mer. 12 juin 2019 à 10:50, Elliott Sales de Andrade a écrit : > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 16:46, Tom Callaway wrote: > > > > Reviving this. I do not have the time nor the energy to attempt to keep > > this going, so I am going to disable the shared bits in cross-gcc and kill > > off

Re: glibc-headers troubles with rawhide on ARM

Le mer. 3 juil. 2019 à 04:35, David Airlie a écrit : > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:57 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:22 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 12:02 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > on Arm hasn't

Re: GCC / annobin changes in F30

Le ven. 28 juin 2019 à 06:03, Michael Cronenworth a écrit : > > Hi, > > I was attempting to package the Kodi 18.3 update for RPMFusion but ran into a > compiler > error very early in the build. GCC outputs the following type of messages: > > cc: error: .annobin-Wl,-wrap,_IO_getc.end: No such

Re: Nvidia GPU overclocking in Fedora Silverblue 30 is currently broken

Le mar. 9 juil. 2019 à 09:42, Ty Young a écrit : For more clarity, please answer in bugzilla (either as new RFE or the current report). > > With that said, the appropriate doc is here: > > https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/NVIDIA > > It is only mentioned to install akmod-nvidia and

Re: Nvidia GPU overclocking in Fedora Silverblue 30 is currently broken

Le lun. 8 juil. 2019 à 16:30, Ty Young a écrit : > > Hi, > > > To whoever is packaging the Nvidia GPU driver in Fedora / RPM Fusion, > overclocking support is currently broken. Not even nvidia-settings is > able to set a GPU core offset value via GUI despite a correct coolbits > value being set.

Re: Nvidia GPU overclocking in Fedora Silverblue 30 is currently broken

Le lun. 8 juil. 2019 à 21:29, Ty Young a écrit : > > Bug filed: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5307 > > The driver itself seems perfectly fine in that the system boots and OpenGL > works perfectly fine. Games are playable. > > How do I output strace to a file directly? It spits

  1   2   3   >