On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Adam Miller
maxamill...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 11:00:43AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Abiword is currently broken in f16/rawhide due to the retiring of
link-grammar (a FTBFS retiree).
This is currently breaking the Xfce, LXDE, and
mesa-7.11-1.fc17
* Tue Aug 02 2011 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com 7.11-1
- Mesa 7.11
- Redo the driver arch exclusion, yet again. Dear secondary arches: unless
it's an on-motherboard driver like i915, all PCI drivers are to be built
for all PCI arches.
Dear X
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Farkas Levente lfar...@lfarkas.org wrote:
On 08/08/2011 04:07 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
On 08/08/2011 08:55 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com
I've done rawhide. It seems I don't have the permissions to do a
builld override even though I'm a proven packager and secondary arch
maintainer.
If you could submit the build-override for the package I'll rebuild
abiword for f-16.
Peter
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Johannes Lips
that this morning.
I hope this was in line with the general guidelines of this process.
Johannes
On 08/09/2011 10:36 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
I've done rawhide. It seems I don't have the permissions to do a
builld override even though I'm a proven packager and secondary arch
maintainer.
If you could
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:40:58 +0200
Johannes Lips johannes.l...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ok, did that now. If you need any further action from my side, just
let me know.
Please note that I have a update with no link-grammar in
Hi All,
I'm going to orphan and block from F-16/rawhide google-gadgets and
ethos unless anyone is interested in picking them up. They're both
pretty dead upstream.
google-gadgets needs to be ported to the latest xulrunner and while
meego has a fork that fixes and improves it quite a bit I don't
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 09:02 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
Can we please either disable these nag messages or give developers the
ability to push a package regardless of testing when it reaches nag age?
You have that
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a package in the F16 branch (copied from F15) that ended up
having a dependency issue with the boost libraries. I have rebuilt the
package for F16 to take care of this but I couldn't find anything on
the wiki[1]
2011/8/19 Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com:
Dne 9.8.2011 00:24, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
A bit of detective work led to:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24615
apparently Arch has been seeing the same thing. They've addressed it by
reverting the following upstream glibc commit:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Noriko Mizumoto
nor...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Dear Fedora package maintainers
To have Fedora 16 high standard in non-English versions, Fedora
Localization will have our review packages process using the image
composed specifically for this purpose. This
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical
path. Why is this? Is that the way we want it to be?
We should get that
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
Neither bodhi
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Deepak Bhole dbh...@redhat.com wrote:
* Douglas Myers–Turnbull dmyersturnb...@gmail.com [2011-07-25 20:53]:
I was planning to do this myself .. glad you started it :) I can take
over the
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 09:51 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
To participate, visit the following link:
http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/fedora-arm/f15hardfp/bootstrap/rootfs_stage4_20110825/
Just a quick update that we've had mock
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 19:13 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 09:51 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
To participate, visit the following link
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtalloc-2.0.6-1.fc15
This CRITPATH package has been in update-testing for 20 days without any
karma. The same package went to stable in F16 a week ago with karma
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Christoph Frieben
christoph.frie...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/9/8 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
Tom Spot Callaway he's been on
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 15:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
There's nothing to do apart from waiting for enough complains to pile up the
people in charge get past their reality denial phase.
/rant
This thread could
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi All,
Please note that I'm not claiming that the critpath process is broken
in general. But it does not work for certain components. To be specific
it does not work for Xorg drivers for non common hardware.
This
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:14:50 -0500
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated
version of OUR OWN FEATURE, we're
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
Short question:
PA 1.0 was released ~1 month ago.
According to the wine developers, the updated mmdevapi layer (the wine
layer that emulates the Windows sound system) more-or-less requires
current PA (1.0?) to
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Nathan O. ndowen...@gmail.com wrote:
I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there and
currently there is an update for the package I have added to the list. Well
I have the package in bodhi, which I believe is in testing right now.
Hey Adam,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed
stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off into a new grub-efi
subpackage. If you have an EFI install of F16 you will need to have
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:29 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 10/12/2011 04:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed
stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 18:41 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 12 October 2011 17:44, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
All existing users of the Fedora Account System (FAS) at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:01 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 13:45 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
I have no problem with changing the password, but leave my ssh keys
alone, unless there is a real
2011/10/12 Henrik Nordström hen...@henriknordstrom.net:
The password change is understandable, but why force an SSH key change
with such short notice?
And what if the SSH key is a hard token (smartcard) which can not be
copied or trivially changed? Switching to a soft key would be mostly
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Panu Matilainen
pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
On 10/13/2011 01:30 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
This is probably not worthy of a bug report, but may still be useful to
confirm a problem that someone else may have experienced.
I resurrected an old notebook (HP
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 18:54 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It's rather too complex to explain the change here, so I suggest
you go and read these first:
On 2 Nov 2011 07:57, Paul Johnson p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
For some reason, Evolution is not finding any of the plugins or anything.
It'll start but has on the title bar
(null) Evolution.
From the command line, I'm getting this
[paul@PB3 ~]$ evolution
e-utils-WARNING **:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com wrote:
Tell us again where to find that gnome shell for dummies doc?
The cheat sheet? http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/CheatSheet
I tried to give it a fair trial, but I found it so
non-intuitive/counter-intuitive that I
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 09:37 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
What's the plan for rather old, limited hardware? Have you personally
got XO-1, XO-1.5 units to test? We'll be testing it (with some
trepidation) at OLPC, but it's
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 14:55 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
Details of rawhide builds for them here[1], the XO-1 build isn't
tested but the XO 1.5 one works fine, I'll be testing further and
likely the next build I do I'll add
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/8/11 12:09 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/11/8 Richard Hugheshughsi...@gmail.com:
2011/11/7 Michał Piotrowskimkkp...@gmail.com:
Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my system?
Checkout
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/8/11 1:08 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Yea, but a lot of people don't have those either. I have around 5K
servers in DCs with not a single printer or scanner in site. The vast
majority of the 4 million odd XOs out
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 18:08 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/8/11 12:09 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/11/8 Richard Hugheshughsi...@gmail.com:
2011
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/8/11 1:59 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On a server like that, you won't have cups installed, so nothing will be
pulling in colord. Whereas if you _do_
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 01:17:41PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Sun Nov 13 08:15:32 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:11 PM, David Shaw ds...@jabberwocky.com wrote:
Hi,
Bug 737387 fixes a race condition that can cause fork() in a multithreaded
program to lock up.
I can confirm that the issue fixed in bug 737387 exists in Fedora 14 as well.
Fedora 14 isn't at end of life just
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
Something that was brought up at the last fesco meeting is that
fesco membership is currently restricted to members of the packaging
group. That's arguably overly restrictive - fesco is intended to be the
body with
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I have a working package of evolution-ews (Exchange Web Services client
for evolution). If there is demand, I can put it up for review, but
co-maintainers are welcome.
Already in Fedora 16+ and working fine
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Does anyone know why F-16 testing updates to the kernel, gtk3 etc. are
stuck in pending state in bodhi for such a long time?
Because there hasn't been a compose/sign/push process done.
Peter
--
devel mailing list
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote about gdk-pixbuf:
It failed the mass rebuild, not much left that depends on it, and
nothing I need. ;)
[...]
So, if anyone really really really wants to keep it alive, feel free to
take it and fix
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 13:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I did test rebuilds in mock of all rawhide packages that are reported to
be dependent on libpng. Out of 964 packages with dependencies on libpng,
we have:
Packages that
anjuta-2.31.90.0-1.fc14
---
* Sun Aug 22 2010 Debarshi Ray ri...@fedoraproject.org - 1:2.31.90.0-1
- Version bump to 2.31.90.0.
* Initial support for Python plugins.
* Language support for Vala got a major update.
* Python is now fully supported.
* Snippets plugin
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Is it really necessary to include entire package change logs in the
rpm changelog
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All!
I would like to exchange review requests - someone may pick up each of
these three easy-to-review Erlang-related applications, and I will
finish your stalled review request. One mine package for one yours -
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 October 2010 09:55, FlorianFesti ffe...@redhat.com wrote:
Sorry for my may be naive question: Why do we need to know if we are
docked or not. Isn't there exactly the same situation if the external
Monitor is
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 19:20 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:18:32AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
don't we already have default behaviours based on the lid switch,
anyway? So why don't we
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 07:31:54PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
So we could at least cover the case where you plug in an external
monitor
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 07:53:25PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
The BIOS generally manages to get that one correct, can we not query
and keep
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As you might be aware, there was a period of roughly two weeks where a
gcc build (gcc-4.5.1-3.fc14) in the buildroots for both Fedora 14 and
Fedora 15. Items built with
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Unfortunately we didn't notice this
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Lars Seipel lars.sei...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sunday 24 October 2010 20:24:30 Kalev Lember wrote:
KDE is pretty much self contained, whereas a Qt upgrade affects a much
larger number of packages. I don't think updating Qt to a new major
version in a stable
2010/11/5 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com:
On 11/04/2010 08:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:41:34 + (UTC), Daniel wrote:
Release of libxml2-2.7.8
libxml2.spec | 10 --
Seems to break the koji build root due to ABI incompatibility.
Dependent
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Richard Marko rma...@redhat.com wrote:
Hot problems:
ID Components Count
---
11834 GConf2 199
11523 control-center
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 07:37:42PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
We support a minimal installation target
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Reading:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel
I know how to rebuild the kernel RPM and have done it many times.
But I've been asked to reproduce a bug using a completely vanilla
unpatched Linus
On 10/03/2012 02:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
As a result of FESCO ticket 952*, Lubomir Rintel's 200+ packages are
in need of new maintainers. Under normal circumstances we'd simply
orphan them all, but given the large number we want to handle this in
a more orderly fashion.
Please reply to
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:18:27AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
You'll need to get the packaging team on board with it. I have to
say it is pretty much non-existent as a
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 04:08:10PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
If we can save space in the minimal cloud image, it seems worth doing
to me. Looks like in the current EC2 instance, it's about 35M (minus a
few K
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Tue, 09.10.12 21:26, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 05:19:59PM -0700, J. Randall Owens wrote:
Just on the naming, I'd rather steer clear of the actual concept, let me
Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 02:19:03PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
But hey, I don't need to install packages or want python!
systemd+ util-linux + bash + initscripts + passwd:
Install 6 Packages (+108 Dependent packages)
Total download
one may say disk storage is nothing these days
iw ould say: mulitply it with 20, 50, 100 virtual machines
on really expensive SAN-storage where disk space is cheap
is not true
And I would say : get an entreprisey deduping san
for production under load not really a good decision
even if,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:34 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:59:55PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct
On 19 Oct 2012 00:51, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 16:43 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:35:56AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Adam Tkac (at...@redhat.com) said:
I've just created
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/31/2012 03:33 PM, drago01 wrote:
That's nonsense see the other mail. Would it be more work to maintain
two branches? Sure. Impossible? *NO*. Even if it delays newui to F20
so be it.
If we don't have the
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 10/31/2012 11:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:59:54AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
I think we need to give developers more time for feature integration
after the feature freeze.
+1
No
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/31/2012 08:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Only one package depends on any of these: gwibber depends on dee. So
someone interested in gwibber might want to pick up dee.
I'll take dee, although, gwibber will never
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/01/2012 09:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
mailto:tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/31/2012 08:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Only
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 09:32 -0500, David Lehman wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 13:01 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/01/2012 12:22 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Maybe having some kind of dependencies between
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:12:59 -0500,
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
This is a problem - when developers do not work first in Rawhide and
do not push back to branched (or push
On 8 Nov 2012 07:35, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
The new anaconda UI and related features are more or less entirely the
cause of the slip.
This shows that those changes should not have been done, or at least not
in
this way.
Hindsight is a fabulous
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 07:56:30PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
long story short, it's firewalld. Its deps are pretty heavy for
something that's supposed to be in minimal. I'm sure twoerner would
welcome help in
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Paul Whalen pwha...@redhat.com wrote:
Good day all,
This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Nov
14th) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work):
PDT: 1pm
MDT: 2pm
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 05:52 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Luke Macken wrote:
A new bugfix release of Bodhi has just been deployed to production.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
Bugs and enhancement
I'm not going to be able to make the meeting.
This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Nov
28th) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work):
PDT: 1pm
MDT: 2pm
CDT: 3pm
EDT: 4pm
UTC: 8pm
BST: 9pm
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Paul Whalen pwha...@redhat.com wrote:
Good day all,
Thanks to those who were able to join us for the weekly status meeting today.
For those that were unable, the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
I can't make the meeting. It conflicts with the Board meeting.
Current items on the agenda:
1) Current Problem packages
2) F18 ARM VFAD - additional feedback, blockers?
3) Ownership of non-release blocking images (Beagleboard XM, etc)
Who decided this was a non blocker? It was my
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/05/2012 02:39 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
I can't make the meeting. It conflicts with the Board meeting.
Current items on the agenda:
1) Current Problem packages
2) F18 ARM VFAD - additional feedback, blockers?
3
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 12/11/2012 02:41 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
commit 8949ba49ab66e8642a38087fd19217dabc4f117b
Author: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Dec 11 21:40:52 2012 +
Build with -fpic on 32 bit too
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
This week's Fedora ARM status will take place today (Wednesday, Dec
12th) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. I will run the meeting with
Brendan as Paul is on PTO today. Please ping us on #fedora-arm with
additional
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 09:06:07AM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 12/21/2012 08:53 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Are you looking at F19 or F20 for PA?
This will be a very engaging topic at FUDCon next month. Current
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Brendan Jones
brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/28/2012 12:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Steve Clark wrote:
Then why is no one fixing the identified bugs?
Because Lennart insists on backporting only individual fixes to Fedora
releases as opposed to
On 29 Dec 2012 01:48, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Dec 28, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Brendan Jones
brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/28/2012 12:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Steve Clark wrote
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Brendan Jones
brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/28/2012 08:25 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Brendan Jones
brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/28/2012 12:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Steve Clark wrote:
Then why
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:48 PM, William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 21:06 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Features/DualstackNetworking =
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:53:25AM +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
Hallo,
for Fedora 17 we had a feature to make btrfs to the
standard filesystem of Fedora. This feature was defered
because the fsck utitlities for
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Joshua C. joshua...@gmail.com wrote:
Some days ago the version number for the f18-kernels was changed to
20x as in kernel-3.7.3-205.fc18. Is there a special reason for this?
Are the first 200 numbers reserved for something?
Yes, read the kernel meeting notes
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 23:56:49 -0500,
Jonathan Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
We had a number of conversations about how to involve more people in
Fedora on ARM. We also had many other conversations that are being
- Original Message -
From: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: a...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] FUDCon ARM related followup
On Mon, Jan 21
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
Always was done with yaboot. Do we know if OLPC will move to UEFI?
I very much doubt it
Sent from my phone. Please excuse formatting and brevity.
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message
On 22 Jan 2013 20:35, Josh Boyer jwbo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:23:44PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 14:13:23 -0500,
Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
On 01/19/2013 05:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote
The hundreds series
On 23 Jan 2013 06:39, Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com wrote:
3) ghc - using LLVM as compiler, as a result incorrect triplet
Not sure what this is referring to: ghc ARM devel for F18 is
basically done (except for a few minor libs appearing
in the Branch report that need rebuilding) and
Hi All,
Sorry, I missed the cogl soname bump when I pushed the build last
night, I'll work to rebuild associated deps now, any help appreciated.
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:35:58PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
FYI - Looks like icu 50 landed in rawhide today with the usual soname bump
Also breaks boost in the buildroot:
[webkitgtk]
That failed, as did the webkitgtk3 I tried to rebuild but firefox
crashed when trying to load the logs to see why.
Failed (many icu flags thing: bug 856594)
I really wish the maintainer communicated this better rather than
throwing it over the fence on a Friday and running away.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 01/28/2013 02:06 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
You don't see the point of MATE or Cinnamon? How long did you play with
them 5 minutes?
Do you remember the GNOME 1.x = 2.x transition? Similarly to how there
are forks of
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I have a filed a bug about this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905345
libcacard can never be installed
Is there a reason that qemu ships a bundled version of libcacard?
What's the difference between the
1 - 100 of 2253 matches
Mail list logo
