On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 11:49:17PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:06:17AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> Along with the rebase I do propose to drop ppc64 from Go
> architectures(effectively disabling build of all packages adhering to
> draft Go packaging guidelines) as ppc64 port of "GC" is not feature
> complete(never were) and with Go
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:56:23PM +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
Patching is not a problem. Unnecessary is the question. Explain to
me (not you in particular Rahul) how these printf's can possibly be
exploited?
Google for sudo format string exploit
Yours Tony
pgpit7eFTE85S.pgp
Description:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:14:53PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/24/2013 02:33 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:01:51PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 2013-07-23 08:04, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
For similar purposes, I have been using the CSV table returned by
https
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:01:51PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 2013-07-23 08:04, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
For similar purposes, I have been using the CSV table returned by
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/lists/bugzilla?tg_format=plain;
I am downloading the CSV-table and then use
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 06:07:59PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Whether this is a blocker or not comes down to a judgement call, because
it hinges on whether this is a significant inconvenience for a large
enough number of users. So we need to know from people who use Fedora in
remote auth
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:22:53PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
I just had to setup a new machine, and new ssh keys.
I visited
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/edit/
I chose my new id_rsa.pub to upload.
But I get:
git push --verbose
Pushing to
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 09:27:20AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 10:44 +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
Hi All,
On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get
yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit
builddeps on a 64-bit system
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:37:10AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 09/08/2011 03:44 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
Hi All,
On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get
yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit
builddeps on a 64-bit system
Hi All,
On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get
yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit
builddeps on a 64-bit system?
Yours Tony
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 01:11:54AM +0200, Volker Fröhlich wrote:
snip
Maybe somebody can either help me to solve the problem or can take over the
package.
If gpsbabel is orphaned or if Silfreed is looking for a co-maintainer I'd be
happy to help. I use gpsbabel regualrly.
Yours Tony
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
