On 10/23/2012 04:54 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Lo!
On 23.10.2012 17:23, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/22/2012 10:37 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/22/2012 10:43 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/22/2012 12:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
There is currently no way to undefine a macro at the rpm
On 11/06/2012 02:00 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
Okay, so here are two patches:
fedpkg-1.10-use-nil-to-unset-distunset.patch (this one uses %nil instead
of 0 in my previous fix)
fedpkg-1.10-unset-runtime-disttag.patch (this patch detects the runtime
environment and unsets the version specific
On 11/06/2012 11:34 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
Jesse, please review and apply these upstream and make a new update.
Fixed comments. Other patch
(fedpkg-1.10-use-nil-to-unset-distunset.patch) is fine as is.
Tweaked and pushed. Building an update now.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a
On 10/22/2012 10:37 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/22/2012 10:43 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/22/2012 12:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
There is currently no way to undefine a macro at the rpm commandline,
rpmbuild --define %{nil} ?
Huh, I swear I knew that once. :) Attached is a patch
Lo!
On 23.10.2012 17:23, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/22/2012 10:37 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/22/2012 10:43 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/22/2012 12:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
There is currently no way to undefine a macro at the rpm commandline,
rpmbuild --define %{nil} ?
Huh,
On 10/18/2012 03:57 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
I'd say the current behaviour is the quite bad, as it leads to different
results when building with fedpkg and rpmbuild on F18. The real fix
afaics would be to revert the change and, if wanted, define rhel as 0 in
Fedora's redhat-rpm-config, too
On 10/22/2012 05:56 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/18/2012 03:57 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
I'd say the current behaviour is the quite bad, as it leads to different
results when building with fedpkg and rpmbuild on F18. The real fix
afaics would be to revert the change and, if wanted, define
On 10/22/2012 12:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
There is currently no way to undefine a macro at the rpm commandline,
rpmbuild --define %{nil} ?
Huh, I swear I knew that once. :) Attached is a patch to use the %{nil}
behavior instead of setting the unused dist macro to 0. I smoke tested
On 10/22/2012 10:43 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/22/2012 12:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
There is currently no way to undefine a macro at the rpm commandline,
rpmbuild --define %{nil} ?
Huh, I swear I knew that once. :) Attached is a patch to use the %{nil}
behavior instead of setting
Lo!
On 09.10.2012 20:03, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/09/2012 07:14 AM, Simone Caronni wrote:
On 19 September 2012 00:26, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 09/05/2012 08:07 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
Jesse, I'm not sure if you're still the correct upstream here, please
correct me if
Hello,
On 18 October 2012 09:57, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
--with-egl-platforms=x11,drm%{!?rhel:,wayland} \
The ,wayland is not added, as rhel is defined now as 0 when building
with fedpgk. If you build a srpm and try to build it with rpmbuild then
it works, as it's not
On 18.10.2012 10:45, Simone Caronni wrote:
On 18 October 2012 09:57, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info
mailto:fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
--with-egl-platforms=x11,drm%{!?rhel:,wayland} \
The ,wayland is not added, as rhel is defined now as 0 when building
with fedpgk. If you
On 18 October 2012 14:47, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
With the old one I had to check like this (first line) for building;
which is not correct anyway as the behaviour was different as well
between fedpkg and rpmbuild/mock: [...]
And that should not be the case imho. But
On 19 September 2012 00:26, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 09/05/2012 08:07 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
Jesse, I'm not sure if you're still the correct upstream here, please
correct me if you're not, and I'll send the patch somewhere else.
This helps me a lot as well building el
On 09/05/2012 08:07 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 09/05/2012 12:48 PM, Simone Caronni wrote:
This means that even for the EPEL branch the first %if block is
evaluated; so the fedpkg on my system (Fedora 17) sets %rhel to 6 but
does not unset %fedora and they are both present.
Confirmed. fedpkg
Hello,
I have a weird error that I do not have when building a package in
mock or locally.
When I try to build a package for EPEL6 that has conditionals inside
for checking the distribution it seems that Fedora is always
validated.
Let me explain.
The spec file is structured like this:
%if
On 5 September 2012 18:48, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
%if 0%{?fedora} = 16 || 0%{?fedora} == 17
%post
%endif
Sorry, a typo, the spec file is done this way for the first block:
%if 0%{?fedora} == 16 || 0%{?fedora} == 17
%post
%endif
Thanks,
--Simone
--
You cannot discover
On 09/05/2012 12:48 PM, Simone Caronni wrote:
This means that even for the EPEL branch the first %if block is
evaluated; so the fedpkg on my system (Fedora 17) sets %rhel to 6 but
does not unset %fedora and they are both present.
Confirmed. fedpkg is inheriting the value of %fedora from the
On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas Spura wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200
Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
while try to make a scratch build i always got:
-
# fedpkg scratch-build
Could
On Friday, October 08, 2010 09:15:08 am Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas Spura wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200
Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
while try to make a scratch build i always got:
On 10/08/2010 04:28 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Friday, October 08, 2010 09:15:08 am Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas Spura wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200
Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
while try to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/8/10 9:57 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 04:28 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Friday, October 08, 2010 09:15:08 am Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas
On 10/08/2010 07:19 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 9:57 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 04:28 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Friday, October 08, 2010 09:15:08 am Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
new cert ie: fedora-packager-setup i was able to build again. then today
i can't build
On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
new cert ie: fedora-packager-setup i was able to build again. then today
i can't build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/8/10 11:09 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
new
On Friday, October 08, 2010 12:19:46 pm Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 9:57 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
[lfar...@eagle jna (f12)]$ fedora-cert -v
Verifying Certificate
cert expires: 2011-04-06
CRL Checking not implemented yet
[lfar...@eagle jna (f12)]$ fedpkg -v build
Creating
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 10:57:58AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
new cert ie:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:09:32PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
new cert ie:
On Friday, October 08, 2010 01:09:32 pm Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
new cert ie:
On 10/08/2010 08:49 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:09:32PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but
On 10/08/2010 08:51 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Friday, October 08, 2010 01:09:32 pm Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but
Try verbose variant to figure out what happened:
$ fedpkg -v scratch-build
06.10.2010 13:19, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
while try to make a scratch build i always got:
-
# fedpkg scratch-build
Could not log into koji: Opening a SSL connection failed
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200
Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
while try to make a scratch build i always got:
-
# fedpkg scratch-build
Could not log into koji: Opening a SSL connection failed
-
even if i try to
hi,
while try to make a scratch build i always got:
-
# fedpkg scratch-build
Could not log into koji: Opening a SSL connection failed
-
even if i try to remove .fedora.cert and fedora-packager-setup (so it's
not a
35 matches
Mail list logo
