Al Dunsmuir wrote:
I agree, provided you mean not necessarily by each package's maintainer.
In some cases, folks working on the common goal do need the assistance of
the package maintainer. Alternatively, the package maintainer may be able
to make the required changes in a timely manner on
On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 15:46 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
the alpha was release and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd
is at 0% - why will F16 released WITHOUT making the system clean which
should have been done for F15
How many releases will this dirty mix of systemd
Hi,
2011/9/6 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
On 09/06/2011 02:55 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) said:
the alpha was release and
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd
is at 0% - why will F16 released WITHOUT making the system clean
On 09/06/2011 08:39 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
I created a service for wpa_supplicant. Is there something wrong with it?
Nope Dan had sanctioned it but then another one appear upstream and as
you know we try to avoid deviating from upstream.
Not sure if Bill spoke with Dan about this ( I
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
There is one thing I have learned ( so far in the conversion process )
and that is that the current model surrounding maintainers and
maintainership followed by various policies surrounding that model which
we use here in Fedora as in maintainers Own their
Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) said:
the alpha was release and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd
is at 0% - why will F16 released WITHOUT making the system clean which
should have been done for F15
Perhaps the feature owner should update it, as per the policy.
How
On 09/06/2011 02:55 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) said:
the alpha was release and
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd
is at 0% - why will F16 released WITHOUT making the system clean which
should have been done for F15
Perhaps the feature
On 09/03/2011 09:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 07:46, Reindl Haraldh.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
snip..
We need to get a provenpackager to just poke through all the packages and
fix them instead of waiting for the maintainers.
In some cases
Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net writes:
the alpha was release and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd
is at 0% - why will F16 released WITHOUT making the system clean which
should have been done for F15
How many releases will this dirty mix of systemd/sysvinit(lsb
Am 04.09.2011 02:20, schrieb Tom Lane:
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 07:46, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
How many releases will this dirty mix of systemd/sysvinit(lsb in the
distribution exist until the OS can
the alpha was release and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd
is at 0% - why will F16 released WITHOUT making the system clean which
should have been done for F15
How many releases will this dirty mix of systemd/sysvinit(lsb in the
distribution exist until the OS can be called
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 07:46, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
the alpha was release and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd
is at 0% - why will F16 released WITHOUT making the system clean which
should have been done for F15
How many releases will this dirty mix
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 07:46, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
How many releases will this dirty mix of systemd/sysvinit(lsb in the
distribution exist until the OS can be called as clean like before
F15?
As
13 matches
Mail list logo
