On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 21:26, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Over the last few days^Wweeks I have been trying to finish off the
'restore' side of our backup infrastructure, as well as the account
aliasing needed to handle the replaced laptop scenario.
I've just pushed the
Hi Martin,
What would it take to move the next XS Server release to either F10 or
F11 as F9 will be EOL as soon as F11 comes out in a month or so (one
month after F11 is out F9 will be EOL).
Peter
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On the mission
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
What would it take to move the next XS Server release to either F10 or
F11 as F9 will be EOL as soon as F11 comes out in a month or so (one
month after F11 is out F9 will be EOL).
It's a bit of a recurring question. I
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
how is this going? I think Paraguay were interested in deploying
backups, are they going to use this code or further development is
needed by them? Any other deployments in sight?
That's done, and I'm working on a few
2009/4/15 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
Hi Martin,
how is this going? I think Paraguay were interested in deploying
backups, are they going to use this code or further development is
needed by them? Any other deployments in sight?
The current interest from Paraguay is a simple way to do
What would it take to move the next XS Server release to either F10 or
F11 as F9 will be EOL as soon as F11 comes out in a month or so (one
month after F11 is out F9 will be EOL).
It's a bit of a recurring question. I am swamped with feature
development for a while. My hope is to port to F11
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
What would it take to move the next XS Server release to either F10 or
F11 as F9 will be EOL as soon as F11 comes out in a month or so
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Sameer Verma wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
wrote:
What would it take to move the next XS Server release to either F10 or
F11 as F9 will be
2009/4/15 Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com:
- dsd has a nice fixup F9 for XO script described here
http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2008/08/regular-linux-desktops-on-the-xo/
The script builds a custom 2.6.25 which I think pulls in a few
additional patches (sound, etc),
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Greg Dekoenigsberg g...@redhat.com wrote:
Choose CentOS. The workflow for managing development atop Centos and Fedora
are essentially the same.
That's the plan for the XS (I'm sure gregdek knows it, but it's good
to broadcast the msg) :-)
In the meantime,
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Greg Dekoenigsberg g...@redhat.com wrote:
Choose CentOS. The workflow for managing development atop Centos and Fedora
are essentially the same.
That's the plan for the XS (I'm sure gregdek knows it, but it's good
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
What's the problem?
My custom initramfs definitely boots on my XO.
Also the stock F9 one did too, but it landed a lot of errors during
boot (which took several seconds to enumerate).
I don't doubt it boots in yours, but it
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Greg Dekoenigsberg g...@redhat.com wrote:
Is there a bug I can herd people towards?
Not a bug as such, as I haven't narrowed down steps to repro, but
here's the start of the relevant threads:
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/server-devel/2009-April/003209.html
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Firmware_q2e41
This release is the culmination of a series of mini-releases that change
the boot order when the system is in the factory, so that the
manufacturing test operating system image will boot even if an SD card
is inserted during production steps.
Choose CentOS. The workflow for managing development atop Centos and Fedora
are essentially the same.
I have no doubt about it, and I've read that going forward that is the
plan for XS. The reason I originally asked the question about what we
need to move it forward to F11 was so that we can
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 21:26, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Over the last few days^Wweeks I have been trying to finish off the
'restore' side of our backup infrastructure, as well as the account
aliasing needed to handle the replaced laptop scenario.
I've just pushed the
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Summary:
- F9 kernels don't boot on the XO from an SD card -- even if we get
the initrd to have the right modules, the initrd loads the modules,
creates the device nodes, and yet fails to mount /dev/root --
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Why are you focusing on F9? There was a large push to get F10 working
Sorry! I mis-addressed the email, was supposed to be to fedora-olpc-list.
Your question is a valid, and a bit of a FAQ - reply here:
2009/4/15 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
Hi Martin,
how is this going? I think Paraguay were interested in deploying
backups, are they going to use this code or further development is
needed by them? Any other deployments in sight?
The current interest from Paraguay is a simple way to do
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Guillaume Desmottes
guillaume.desmot...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
Le vendredi 03 avril 2009 à 10:40 -0400, Dave Bauer a écrit :
AHA! gadget.config.
Can we add the startup and gadget.config to the README?
I didn't realise this file was not documented,
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Greg Dekoenigsberg g...@redhat.com wrote:
Choose CentOS. The workflow for managing development atop Centos and Fedora
are essentially the same.
That's the plan for the XS (I'm sure gregdek knows it, but it's good
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 12:14 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
2009/4/15 Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com:
- dsd has a nice fixup F9 for XO script described here
http://www.reactivated.net/weblog/archives/2008/08/regular-linux-desktops-on-the-xo/
The script builds a custom 2.6.25
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote:
- Build a kernel exactly like Fedora 9 kernels, but with the mmc
drivers built statically. This is what I am am doing right now,
following the nice guide at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/CustomKernel
Martin: what
23 matches
Mail list logo
