I know very little about how ebook detection works on Windows. There is
a magic Windows driver that does that stuff, and we don't have much
insight into its inner workings.
The only thing I can suggest is to test it.
On 12/4/2010 5:20 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi Mitch,
With this DSDT
daniel wrote:
Hi Paul,
I've made some small changes to your code for the XO-1.5 ebook switch
driver and am wondering if you have any comments before I submit this
upstream.
this looks great. thanks again for taking this on. i haven't yet had
a chance to do a close review (will do
On 5 December 2010 14:26, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
like chris, i don't think this is a great name. we already use at
least two naming styles (olpc_dcon_xo_1_5.c, olpc-pm-1.5.c) and
introducing a third doesn't seem great. frankly, i think xo15,
xo175, etc, would be sufficient, since
2010/12/5 Christophe Guéret c.d.m.gue...@vu.nl:
I would like to compile some stuff to be run on an XO-1 and I would rather
doing that on my desktop rather than on the XO directly.
You didn't mention what you want to compile so I'll assume its just a
regular application.
You can compile it like
--- On Sat, 12/4/10, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
From: Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org
Trying to build an XO-1.5 kernel in an F14 machine
from the olpc-2.6.35 git sources, make xo_1_5-kernel-rpm
fails because it requires dracut-modules-olpc = 0.5.4.
So install it. It's a regular
We are in the midst of assessing the image that will go on the 115 XO
1.5 we have in Jamaica. Should we stick with 852 or should we go to
Dextrose? I remember seeing the Samoa project being upgraded to
Dextrose (Tabitha cc'd). Are there any major advantages to Dextrose?
Keep in mind that both
On 5 December 2010 20:02, Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote:
After installing it, on the next fedora kernel update, olpc dracut modules
apparently kick in modifying initrd accordingly.
On next reboot a get a nice Hello, (deployment people) of the world!
And then a not so nice
Hello,
I would like to compile some stuff to be run on an XO-1 and I would rather
doing that on my desktop rather than on the XO directly.
How can this image be run with QEMU, if it can? The wiki speaks about
specific devel images than doesn't seem to be available for this testing
release.
On 5 December 2010 17:28, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2010/12/5 Christophe Guéret c.d.m.gue...@vu.nl:
I would like to compile some stuff to be run on an XO-1 and I would
rather
doing that on my desktop rather than on the XO directly.
You didn't mention what you want to compile so
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
Downsides
- Increased SD card wear
For about two years now, I've been defining a swap partition on the
(external) permanent SD card I use with my XO-1 systems. So far, I
have never experienced any problems with that
BTW, the card is a Sandisk 4GiB Class 2, bought used on eBay. First one
bought for installing OSs, going stronger where others have failed with a
lot less use. Approximately 1GiB is free, not touching the NAND for anything
other than testing new XO OS releases.
Tiago
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:25
That's strange, wherever I have used flash memory to serve as boot drive,
the kernel/userspace waits for the writes to be complete before powering
down. I have not experienced corruption that looks anything similar to
what's described. So the software is thinking it has written it but it
doesn't?
Hi,
That's strange, wherever I have used flash memory to serve as
boot drive, the kernel/userspace waits for the writes to be
complete before powering down. I have not experienced corruption
that looks anything similar to what's described. So the software
is thinking it has
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
That's strange, wherever I have used flash memory to serve as
boot drive, the kernel/userspace waits for the writes to be
complete before powering down. I have not experienced corruption
that looks anything
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 12:30:52AM +, Tiago Marques wrote:
That's strange, wherever I have used flash memory to serve as boot
drive, the kernel/userspace waits for the writes to be complete before
powering down. I have not experienced corruption that looks anything
similar to what's
15 matches
Mail list logo
