XO-1.5 wifi wakeup mechanics

2011-01-13 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, Low priortity query... I'm investigating the possibility of implementing _SWS (system wakeup source) support in the XO-1.5 DSDT, along with _SWS support in Linux. This seems like the most likely way to get XO-1.5 wakeup source detection upstream. I haven't fully wrapped my head around this

Re: [Testing] Software update problems in OLPC 10.1.3

2011-01-13 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:00 PM, S Page skierp...@gmail.com wrote: Good to know.  I've got a Help-11 installed according to its activity_version in activity.info and Home view List view, so it seems right to be trying to update. I just repeated Software Update and it claims all my software

Re: [Testing] Software update problems in OLPC 10.1.3

2011-01-13 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:00 PM, S Page skierp...@gmail.com wrote: Good to know. I've got a Help-11 installed according to its activity_version in activity.info and Home view List view, so it seems right

Re: [Testing] Software update problems in OLPC 10.1.3

2011-01-13 Thread Samuel Greenfeld
Help-12 is in the G1G1 set, as well as the G1G1Lite set for 10.1.3. This update issue therefore would be somewhat unexpected. I just checked on an XO-1.5 I upgraded from 10.1.2 and it does have Help-12. Some more debugging likely is needed for your case. Another activity which we know has

Re: [Testing] Software update problems in OLPC 10.1.3

2011-01-13 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: We are including Help 12 Everyone's right and I misread the page. Apologies to all. As Sam points out, it does upgrade in our testing -- can you get us logs from a run of the software updater? m --

Re: XO-1.5 wifi wakeup mechanics

2011-01-13 Thread Mitch Bradley
You already know more about this than I do, so I can't be of any help here. On 1/13/2011 3:47 AM, Daniel Drake wrote: Hi, Low priortity query... I'm investigating the possibility of implementing _SWS (system wakeup source) support in the XO-1.5 DSDT, along with _SWS support in Linux. This

Re: Record activity performance

2011-01-13 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
On 24 December 2010 12:03, Sridhar Dhanapalan srid...@laptop.org.au wrote: On 24 December 2010 11:12, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:36:56AM +1100, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote: The project pages for those activities are:  

xorg-x11-drv-geode-2.11.11-1.fc14 for testing

2011-01-13 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi Samuel, To help with https://bugs.freedesktop.org//show_bug.cgi?id=33004 I've just built http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=214034 Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: Record activity performance

2011-01-13 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:04:11AM +1100, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote: http://dev.laptop.org.au no longer uses SSL (use https if you want it). Can you please give it a go and tell me if it does/doesn't make an improvement? If not, we can revert to forcing SSL. It makes an improvement. Tested on

Re: [Server-devel] Schoolserver and eth1

2011-01-13 Thread tom
On Fri, January 14, 2011 5:08 pm, Dr. Gerald Ardito wrote: Even though there is physically a second nic, the school server doesn't seem to see it. When I ifconfig eth1, I am told there is no device present. Does the nic show up when do lspci? If not then it's likely broken. Does the nic show

Re: [Server-devel] Schoolserver and eth1

2011-01-13 Thread Dr. Gerald Ardito
Tom, Here's what's weird. The server came with one nic (the box is a Del Vostro). I added the second. Now, only the second works, and only as eth0. And, when it works as eth0, I have an internet connection. I tried installing two new nics, but only one shows up. I would imagine that I don't have

Re: [Server-devel] Schoolserver and eth1

2011-01-13 Thread tom
On Fri, January 14, 2011 6:51 pm, Dr. Gerald Ardito wrote: I would imagine that I don't have the drivers for the first (original) one. Does that make any sense? Thats possible. It could also be turned of in the BIOS (I was up till 3am once upgrading the operating system in the hope that new