On 28 February 2011 03:32, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
Tested on XO-1.5 using a build of Q3A62 plus this patch, against 10.1.3
and 11.2.0 os11, the following /ofw entries were visible:
/ofw/pci/isa@11/rtc@i70/compatible - 'olpc,xo1-rtc' 'pnpPNP,b00'
(previously only 'pnpPNP,b00')
Folks:
Back in the old days, when velociraptors roamed the Earth, and build 802
ruled the XO1 environment, there was a neat little customization that one
could put on a USB stick that enabled one to install a bunch of activities
just by booting with the customized USB stick installed.
The
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote:
Back in the old days, when velociraptors roamed the Earth, and build 802
ruled the XO1 environment, there was a neat little customization that one
Hey! I remember back then! Got a few bite-marks from a velociraptor
On 28 February 2011 15:20, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote:
I have copied these files over onto a stick with the 860 builds, but the
activity install does not seem to run. Could it be that a) I need different
versions of the .zip files in the boot directory, or b) this techinique is
Thanks!
O, you mean that section boldly typed in red! How could I be expected to
read that?
:-)
I will run it through the hoops on 860. Since there seems to be some code
which plugs 'jffs2' in what ML sent me, should I still try with OS11?
KG
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Daniel Drake
On 28 February 2011 16:38, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote:
I will run it through the hoops on 860. Since there seems to be some code
which plugs 'jffs2' in what ML sent me, should I still try with OS11?
The XO-1 customization stick won't work on 11.2.0. Not sure if I'm
going to fix
In Linux we plan to use the device tree for probing the DCON, battery, and
XO-1 RTC drivers.
Add the required information using the naming scheme suggested by
Grant Likely.
The dcon node and battery's compatible property apply for both XO-1 and
XO-1.5. The RTC's compatible property is only added
Patch applied to svn head.
Note that it might be prudent to do the patch in olpc.fth instead of
going through a release/test cycle for XO-1 OFW.
On 2/28/2011 7:09 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
In Linux we plan to use the device tree for probing the DCON, battery, and
XO-1 RTC drivers.
Add the
Hi Daniel,
to ensure we keep track (and limit) of what non-Fedora rpms make it to
the builds, should the rpm collection step... ?
- only grab rpms that say .olpc
- complain about rpms that don't...
This would mean that in the package listing, it's non-ambiguous what
packages we're carrying.
On 02/28/2011 02:37 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Hi Daniel,
to ensure we keep track (and limit) of what non-Fedora rpms make it to
the builds, should the rpm collection step... ?
- only grab rpms that say .olpc
- complain about rpms that don't...
This would mean that in the package
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
What would be the preferred place to put 'olpc' in the rpm name? Between
the distribution version and the 'arch'? Like:
Version: 0.92.0
Release: 1%{?dist}.olpc
Yes - dsd links to
Talking about SRPM, F14 kernel srpms are still not published in
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~dsd/repos/. F11 kernel srpms are.
The SRPMs are build in both cases but I guess the publishing script in the F14
case, excludes them.
Please publish them
FWIW, the original intent was *only* to allow SRPMS in the dropbox; we were
going to explicitly rebuild the RPMs from the SRPMS in mock and use only the
built RPMs. In addition to ensuring compliance with licensing provisions,
this was also intended as a developer aid: at the time, it was often
Gents:
Yes the bundle customization boot works exactly as advertised. As long as
one remembers that the 'boot with x key' means the game 'x key' and not the
escape 'x key'. :-)
Thanks everyone.
KG
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 28 February 2011
Here's a scenario:
1. child's XO stuffs up
2. XO's OS is re-flashed
3. XO is registered again against the XS
4. XO has its backups restored from the XS
5. collaboration, classroom segregation, etc. work as before
Alternatively, what if the XO is broken and replaced instead of just
15 matches
Mail list logo
