Early in OLPC, we seriously wanted to go with Java: but Sun's licensing
was a serious issue we could not get around, despite a number of
attempts by Walter to talk with Sun and see if it could get fixed.
Part of the issue caused by this licensing was the all or nothing part
of it: as shipped,
length is necessary.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys j...@freedesktop.org
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
I too am sad to be leaving the project; but there many, many kids who
will be benefiting. I've learned a lot, and made friends all over the
world.
I may be involved in some form as a volunteer in the future but in the
near term I also need to focus on finding employment. You know where to
find
), then you
are probably willing to buy one later.
Soldered down SD, however may be an intermediate point; may fewer wires
than a conventional chip.
--
Jim Gettys j...@laptop.org
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
to do next.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
we have
to detect what touchpad we are running?
Unfortunately, we'll have to detect it. This whole are of X is being
reworked as we speak Upstream, everything is hot plug, and you can
then set things on a per detected device basis.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys
with no noticeable speed difference
between it and a desktop. Why wasn't this approach considered instead
of putting XP on XOs?
Can't take thin clients home, so you are immediately limited to
in-school use.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys
Linux using this
information, however, so there *may* be work to be done in Linux.
How far/well mdns scales with the mesh routing protocols, however, is
another question.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
this to what the
local printer needs.
David Lang
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing
:
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 09:15 -0700, Jim Gettys wrote:
Note there is a client library for IPP for cups that can talk to remote
servers, without having to run a spooler locally. This may be a better
option
It might be if it were an option that actually worked. But I tried it a
month
a browser, we have a browser, are we almost
done yet? :-)
John
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
.
Ubuntu also seems a much better fit in spirit than RedHat.
No distribution wars plase :) Let's stay on topic...
Marco
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
, and it doesn't
have an ubifs driver.
- Chris.
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
are applicable to the
XO, and how far are we from it, please?
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
is a blank page when I try to connect to the
home page.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org
://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
it will run nicely on the XO.
The renderer is based on WebKit.
Ton van Overbeek
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
to provide. Note that the X server/driver may have compressed some
sequential motion events together to begin with.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http
://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel
___
Security mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/security
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org
not sure that testing on a B3 is worth much. I think A different
touchpad firmware was in use then.
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org
PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
pushed back to 9.1.0.
--Chris
Things not in trac tend to get forgotten Is it in trac? If so,
what bug?
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http
compatible...
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
, the current situation demonstrates that it is a worthwhile
target for future releasese.
Erik
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
.
Erik
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys
, it would
seem to me avoiding this cliff is important.
I think analyzing performance of non-JFFS2 file systems and picking
a replacement should be a high-priority item for 9.1 update.
No argument here
- Jim
~Deepak
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One
In general, gnome is moving away from Bonobo/Orbit toward dbus based
messaging.
- Jim
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 20:09 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 13:28 -0400, Jim Gettys wrote
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 20:25 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, gnome is moving away from Bonobo/Orbit toward dbus based
messaging.
Yeah, there is no plan yet (that I know of) to replace GConf with
something
). The Freire story is a good one,
and mango is such a fun word to say.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
that OLPC's xulrunner continues
to avoid it's dependency on libgnome.
Daniel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 19:48 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel,
It is quiet possible we'll want to pick up gnomevfs2 as a basic library
in a future release (think about the OLPCfs method of accessing the
journal
, or
whatever, would be fine
A fully working XO would be best used for someone who hasn't one yet IMHO.
Anyway, I'll drop a message
Thanks
Guylhem
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys
rendering engine for
everything, to save flash space, and the certificate UI we're missing.
I can also anticipate Javascript performance may become an issue as its
use continues to increase.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
like browse, we'd want pretty full integration.
- Jim
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 12:32 -0400, Jim Gettys wrote:
Let me summarize where I think we are and/or should go and try to put
this into some context:
0) good rendering onto our high resolution screen is very important
(competition is
a wonderful thing ;-)).
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
2097 contains the appropriate bits.
The one major change I was hopeing to get into kernel for 8.2
is integrating intiramfs and kernel into one RPM but I think
the probability of getting that done in next few days is not
too high ATM.
~Deepak
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop
, no one here now remembers where this
font came from, or where the upstream came from. Can someone familiar
with thai support help out? Ideally we'd like to confirm the
licensing and then grow a maintainer for this package in fedora.
Thanks!
--scott
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop
reply to to get their mail sent back to
their main mailbox
- Jim
Jim Gettys wrote:
Here's mailman's recommendation about replyto...
http://lists.laptop.org/admin/devel/?VARHELP=general/reply_goes_to_list
- Jim
On Wed, 2008-07
the reply in the way they specified when they subscribed to
it. What am I missing?
2008/7/2 Dennis Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 02 July 2008, Jim Gettys wrote:
Here's mailman's recommendation about replyto...
http://lists.laptop.org/admin
. In which case the naming is really a poor choice.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing
I think Victor would be very happy to have a single spec file that
covers both the subset and full csound builds
- Jim
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 09:53 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Monday 30 June 2008, Jim Gettys wrote:
Dennis:
OLPC csound is an *exact* formal
projects and versions,
allowing distributions to mix and match).
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
there is no window hint which could help us there...
Also note that Metacity is reputed to be a decent code base to work in;
a simple modification isn't unreasonable
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel
or the gedit one) and which not (the
gimp)? afaik there is no window hint which could help us there...
There are ICCCM/EWMH hints to request full screen behavior, already
implemented by window managers: e.g. totem or other video players use
these routinely.
- Jim
--
Jim
the same as a compiler
recognizing it is compiling itself).
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http
:59PM -0400, Jim Gettys wrote:
Plus it requires them (and users) to run the tools embedded into the
possibly suspect image in order to describe itself. Do you see how
there could be a trust problem there?
Note this is no different than any time you use a compiler binary
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
a compiler binary
provided by someone else... The attack is just as complete...
http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/ken/trust.html
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http
@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
works or something like that (if the wireless works).
Thank you!
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
folks at cozybit
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
/ )
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
, both because many of
you may have good ideas to contribute, and that people having some idea
of direction is essential; this is essential both for developers and our
primary purchasers, governments and NGO's.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
interesting
(if you are keen to help with XO-2, that is).
For the time being, XO-2 is far, far away. I tend to not care about
things I can't put into action right now :-)
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 17:17 -0700, Alex Belits wrote:
Jim Gettys wrote:
Bert...
Part of the problem is the X driver model is pretty broken, causing much
more to be done in software than should be necessary; and it isn't clear
we're even using X efficiently at the moment... The driver
keyboards - do I add
the relevant changes to xkeyboard-config and start a build in Koji ?
Thanks,
Sayamindu
I have memories of this working this way so that the layout switching
works.
Bernie?
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
Freudenberg wrote:
What are the software plans for the second-generation XO?
- Bert -
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
price through the entire chain; what
kind/size of power generation you need, etc.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
will be updated? Or we have to
deal with a mixed enviroment? (no problem... just asking...)
Best regards,
Javier Rodriguez
Lima, Peru
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED
!)
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
pilots, but will be in time for large
deployments.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 22:19 -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
Windows-only is $3 extra.
No, you can't fit Windows in 1 Gig of NAND.
You get to pay the $7 for an SD card no matter what, to run Windows, for
$10 total.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop
the Windows scenario to require a
BIOS to be flashed in place of OFW. Then we lose the simple dual boot
capability.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per
changed the hardware
Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
on the very first start and after a reboot,
xulrunner does component registration on the very first start which
could be expensive
Thanks.
Marco
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 18:56 +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FUSE is great, but...
It means interoperability must be an explicit planned-in-advance action:
Exactly. That's also my beef with the FUSE approach. The things
Vertical sync
Pin 15 SCL I²C clock
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 11:15 +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:18 AM, Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason for FUSE (specifically via the new Gnome replacement for the
old, unloved, GnomeVFS) is to enable better interoperability with
non-Sugar applications
running?
Could this be automatically started when an app wants to collaborate,
or is it something that would have to be running in the background
beforehand?
Either is possible.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
).
To which two different naming systems are you referring?
Thanks,
Tomeu
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
curricula, one computer based, and one conventionally based (on paper,
chalkboard, or in extreme cases dirt). Teaching is tough enough as it
is without making the teacher's workload go up.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 20:22 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 16:06 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On 5/8/08, Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 13:09 +, Tomeu Vizoso wrote
of a laptop; not a shared
device that they get a small amount of the day
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Please remember of the need for file names in the on disk structure
being human readable. The need for interoperability (not just with
Sugar) is key. This wasn't quite clear in your discussion.
- Jim
--
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 09:17 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, 6 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ubuntu takes packages maintaned externally and picks what version of each
of
those packages to put in the main distro. the versions of these seperate
packages are almost entirely
(or G1G1 or whatever with the Geode LX). Shall I apply again?
Jim Gettys wrote:
I checked this morning now that I'm functioning again; the developer's
program should be moving again, and volumes available should be much
higher than before mass production (particularly if you can tolerate
Specifically, the intent of the developer program is to support
development: it is not a back door way to get machines for small trials.
In general, it is in support of individual's needs (one or a few
machines), though we'll also consider a professor's request for a class
they are teaching, or a
an option
when Sugar was started, though with 20-20 hindsight, we probably should
have used something other than matchbox from the beginning.
- Jim
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 16:32 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
can/should/will work
with the freedesktop mailing list to catch the oversights.
I suspect we're using dbus in some places where we should just be using
the normal ICCCM/EWMH conventions.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys
One Laptop Per Child
or
at worst the week after. I intend to continue to take it easy this week.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
interoperate with each other!]
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--
Jim Gettys
One Laptop Per Child
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http
on the release. It is the
most succint means of communication with decision-makers, big and
small. As such it should be a clear indication of what kind of things
I'll find in the changelog, specially for those users that will not
read the changelog.
cheers,
martin
--
Jim Gettys
One Laptop Per
1 - 100 of 230 matches
Mail list logo