On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 07:45:58AM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
For this reason, Sugar needs a wider basis, to run on more Linux
platforms and to run under
Windows. We have been engaged in discussions with Microsoft for
several months, to explore a
dual boot version of the XO. Some of you
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 02:21:22PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
But it doesn't really matter much as Charles Kane makes it clear in
todays interview [1]
It was last week, actually.
... that OLPC is now actually selling XOs with Windows on them:
After the success and the impact we have had
My understanding is that although Windows is available, there have
been no sales; deployments have preferred Sugar.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Sascha
Silbesascha-ml-ui-sugar-olpc-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 07:45:58AM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
For this reason,
Even the OLPC wiki contains links [1] to misleading reports [2] about
Windows on the XO without any further, clarifying comment.
OLPCNews' quote of NN didn't make it clear [3] as well:
For this reason, Sugar needs a wider basis, to run on more Linux
platforms and to run under
Windows.
