On 12 March 2013 01:26, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org
wrote:
Perhaps I don't understand but I don't see how OOB can work for a setup
like
Adam is describing in Haiti where they have laptops in the mix that are
Wad said:
Please don't redistribute secure laptops --- OLPC's policy since
early 2009 has been to deprecate the security system. The
exceptions have been deployments large enough to have dedicated
support staff capable of handling their own keys.
Richard said:
That policy is fine but
On 3/12/2013 3:44 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
On 12 March 2013 01:26, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org
mailto:d...@laptop.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Richard A. Smith
rich...@laptop.org mailto:rich...@laptop.org wrote:
Perhaps I don't understand but I don't see how
On 3/11/2013 10:08 PM, John Watlington wrote:
Please don't redistribute secure laptops --- OLPC's policy since early 2009 has
been to deprecate the security system. The exceptions have been deployments
large enough to have dedicated support staff capable of handling their own
keys.
I wish
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:36:36AM -0800, John Gilmore wrote:
Can an upcoming signed software release automatically disable the
anti-owner security system on old lockdown laptops? Any new, signed
Forth release could look for the original OLPC signing keys and
disable security on laptops that
On Mar 12, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Holt wrote:
On 3/11/2013 10:08 PM, John Watlington wrote:
Please don't redistribute secure laptops --- OLPC's policy since early 2009
has
been to deprecate the security system. The exceptions have been deployments
large enough to have dedicated support staff
At least use the collection stick on this trip, even if you don't get
the unlock stick done this trip because of lack of network
connectivity or time.
The collection stick also saves you the bother of figuring out whether
a laptop is locked. It does nothing on unlocked laptops unless the
'x'
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote:
Perhaps I don't understand but I don't see how OOB can work for a setup like
Adam is describing in Haiti where they have laptops in the mix that are
secure. Unless they first un-secure every laptop a custom OS build
On 03/11/2013 10:26 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
would have to be signed by OLPC or Reuben would have to give them a Haiti
key thats installed via keyjector.
This is not a new situation for us, and the approach we have taken in
the past is to help such deployments un-secure all of their laptops,
On Mar 11, 2013, at 1:54 PM, Richard A. Smith wrote:
On 03/11/2013 10:26 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
would have to be signed by OLPC or Reuben would have to give them a Haiti
key thats installed via keyjector.
This is not a new situation for us, and the approach we have taken in
the past is
On 03/11/2013 10:08 PM, John Watlington wrote:
Nod. Kejector for small deployments is new to me. I thought keyjector was only
for special cases.
I don't think most of the folks on say the support-gang list have any idea that
keyjector is an option for them.
I don't think it is an option.
On Mar 11, 2013, at 10:44 PM, Richard A. Smith wrote:
On 03/11/2013 10:08 PM, John Watlington wrote:
Please don't redistribute secure laptops --- OLPC's policy since early 2009
has
been to deprecate the security system. The exceptions have been deployments
large enough to have
On 03/11/2013 10:48 PM, John Watlington wrote:
That policy is fine but perhaps needs to be more visible to the
people going into areas where secure laptops were distributed and
we should try to be helpful to those people when they request
developer keys.
If someone isn't being helpful about
On 03/09/2013 01:35 PM, Kevin Gordon wrote:
I seem to remember from the devel list that martin and Daniel said
there are no plans to re-enable it. The future is OOB.
Chopping the list down to just devel@ for my comments.
Perhaps I don't understand but I don't see how OOB can work for a
On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 14:58 -0400, Richard A. Smith wrote:
On 03/09/2013 01:35 PM, Kevin Gordon wrote:
I seem to remember from the devel list that martin and Daniel said
there are no plans to re-enable it. The future is OOB.
Chopping the list down to just devel@ for my comments.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 02:58:02PM -0400, Richard A. Smith wrote:
On 03/09/2013 01:35 PM, Kevin Gordon wrote:
I seem to remember from the devel list that martin and Daniel said
there are no plans to re-enable it. The future is OOB.
Chopping the list down to just devel@ for my comments.
Thanks Kevin,
I think choice 2 is the best given the current situation. I've never done
an OOB build, I don't have any secured XO-1.0 laptops to verify the signing
process. There's an extreme urgency to meet a Wednesday deadline, and I've
got some other priorities to deal with before leaving,
These Haiti's laptops are a mix of secured and unsecured XO-1s. They are
Give1Get1 redonations, mostly running Release 10.1.3 untouched, we'll be
upgrading on the ground in Haiti within days.
We'd love if the longstanding
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Customization_stick could be fixed on 13.1.0
:53
To: Community Support Volunteers -- who help respond to \help AT
laptop.org\support-g...@lists.laptop.org; IAEPi...@lists.sugarlabs.org;
Devel's in the Detailsdevel@lists.laptop.org
Cc: Michael Stonemichael.r.st...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [support-gang] Customization Sticks fails on 13.1.0
19 matches
Mail list logo
