Mitch,
Is there a simple way from OFW (or ACPI) to restrict
the operating frequency of the processor in the XO-1.5
to be the lowest possible ?
The relevant comment from a deployment was that they
can't use full speed XO-1.5 motherboards as replacements
for XO-1 motherboards. They think kids
They'd also notice the graphics performance differences, and that
wouldn't be amenable to a simple fix.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Mar 30, 2010, at 2:48 AM, James Cameron wrote:
They'd also notice the graphics performance differences, and that
wouldn't be amenable to a simple fix.
Correct, and they would still get twice the memory and roughly
1.5 times the storage (JFFS2 is compressed).
What I didn't mention is that
ok 406. 199 msr!
The period after 406 is mandatory - it forces the number to be 64-bits,
suitable as the data operand to msr!.
John Watlington wrote:
Mitch,
Is there a simple way from OFW (or ACPI) to restrict
the operating frequency of the processor in the XO-1.5
to be the lowest
The 4 is 406 is for 400 Mhz. The normal value is a06, where a is
decimal 10 for 1000 Mhz.
The 6 is the voltage selection code; this processor only supports the
value 6.
Mitch Bradley wrote:
ok 406. 199 msr!
The period after 406 is mandatory - it forces the number to be
64-bits, suitable
Is there a simple way from OFW (or ACPI) to restrict
the operating frequency of the processor in the XO-1.5
to be the lowest possible ?
The relevant comment from a deployment was that they
can't use full speed XO-1.5 motherboards as replacements
for XO-1 motherboards. They think kids
On Mar 30, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
Is there a simple way from OFW (or ACPI) to restrict
the operating frequency of the processor in the XO-1.5
to be the lowest possible ?
The relevant comment from a deployment was that they
can't use full speed XO-1.5 motherboards as
