Re: Status of Develop.activity?

2008-01-07 Thread Jameson Chema Quinn
- version control. Activity Sharing (see below) only really covers the Pair Programming use case. The version control concept covers a range of other issues. Develop should track changes made by programmers, and provide them with a means to share and merge their changes. This one I spent

Re: Status of Develop.activity?

2007-12-09 Thread Bernardo Innocenti
On 12/06/07 00:58, Albert Cahalan wrote: It only gets bad when the RPM is defective, as is rather common. Getting X11 headers will drag in libGL. I could fix this in the OLPC branch of libX11. -- \___/ |___| Bernardo Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \___\ One Laptop Per Child -

Re: Status of Develop.activity?

2007-12-09 Thread Bernardo Innocenti
On 12/09/07 13:03, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: On 12/06/07 00:58, Albert Cahalan wrote: It only gets bad when the RPM is defective, as is rather common. Getting X11 headers will drag in libGL. I could fix this in the OLPC branch of libX11. The nasty dependency was actually in

Re: Status of Develop.activity?

2007-12-05 Thread Michael Burns
http://blog.vrplumber.com/2009 On Dec 5, 2007 8:30 AM, Charles Durrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am I missing where the status of Develop activity is documented? Is it (1) in work, (2) frozen, (3) abandoned/orphaned, (4) unknown/no consensus? Andrew Clunis had it for a while but last change

Status of Develop.activity?

2007-12-05 Thread Charles Durrett
Am I missing where the status of Develop activity is documented? Is it (1) in work, (2) frozen, (3) abandoned/orphaned, (4) unknown/no consensus? Andrew Clunis had it for a while but last change was months ago. TIA ___ Devel mailing list

Re: Status of Develop.activity?

2007-12-05 Thread Charles Durrett
Howdy. Comments inline below. On Dec 5, 2007 6:37 PM, Jameson Chema Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Starting January 6, I plan to be working 20 hours a week on Develop. Actually I was gonna do tinymail first as Sugar practice. I estimate that I will have something useable (for Develop)

Re: Status of Develop.activity?

2007-12-05 Thread Jameson Chema Quinn
Starting January 6, I plan to be working 20 hours a week on Develop. Actually I was gonna do tinymail first as Sugar practice. I estimate that I will have something useable (for Develop) within a month, though usable is very very far from feature-complete. No source control, language features,

Re: Status of Develop.activity?

2007-12-05 Thread Albert Cahalan
Charles Durrett writes: On Dec 5, 2007 6:37 PM, Jameson Chema Quinn jquinn at cs.oberlin.edu wrote: Starting January 6, I plan to be working 20 hours a week on Develop. Actually I was gonna do tinymail first as Sugar practice. If tinymail is an email client, I'd like to discuss it with you.

Re: Status of Develop.activity?

2007-12-05 Thread Albert Cahalan
On Dec 6, 2007 12:29 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 5, 2007 10:15 PM, Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Finally we have the problem of NO systems programming language being supplied. It's less than 9 MB for the whole C development environment, including a decent

Re: Status of Develop.activity?

2007-12-05 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
C. Scott Ananian wrote: On Dec 5, 2007 10:15 PM, Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Finally we have the problem of NO systems programming language being supplied. It's less than 9 MB for the whole C development environment, including a decent collection of *-devel packages. You even get

Re: Status of Develop.activity?

2007-12-05 Thread Yoshiki Ohshima
The old 8-bit computer BASIC editors often would simply refuse to let you enter bad syntax. The language was also quite easy. Sorry to all the LISP fans out there, but 220 GOTO 200 is really easy for kids to understand. The XO is sorely lacking in something so easy to use. The other stuff