Yazid Hadj Said schrieb:
Hi,
I read the source code of tel2sip function and i noticed that you use
the host of from URI as domain of RURI
Are you sure that it's correct?
Yes. Usually telephone numbers are encoded into SIP URIs using
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thus, as the From domain usually
Henning Westerholt schrieb:
On Friday 04 July 2008, Jason Penton wrote:
Hi Olle,
Long time. Thanks - i'm going to get going on this then and will let the
list know.
Hi Jason,
no offence - don't know what your expectations with regards to the speed of
this mailing list are. But i'd
Revision: 4443
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=4443view=rev
Author: klaus_darilion
Date: 2008-07-02 00:09:05 -0700 (Wed, 02 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
---
- fix ser...; entities -- openser...;
- READMEs regenereated
Modified Paths:
--
IMO this whole NULL stuff with AVPs, variables and PVs is really
annoying. We should try to find a common, intuitive behavior for the
next release.
regards
klaus
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb:
Hi Iñaki,
Assigning NULL to an AVP will remove the AVP - that AVP will not exist
anymore. So the
the implementation specific reasons, but I
think NULL handling should be identical for all kind of PVs.
regards
klaus
Regards,
Bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
IMO this whole NULL stuff with AVPs, variables and PVs is really
annoying. We should try to find a common, intuitive behavior
/docbook.xsl
make: *** [modules-readme] Error 4
thanks
klaus
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb:
Hi Klaus,
Use make modules-readme [modules=.]
Regards,
Bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
Is it somewhere documented how the new module documentation works and
how I can regenerate the README
13:08:05 Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió:
On 06/27/08 12:41, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El Friday 27 June 2008 09:21:13 Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió:
On 06/26/08 16:44, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Is it useful to have an AoR without username?
I don't need it personally. It is why I asked.
It's
Is it useful to have an AoR without username? Maybe AoRs without
username should be rejected always.
regards
klaus
Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb:
Hello,
there seems to be an incoherence in dealing with the AoR for location
records in conjunction with use_domain 1.
The save() from
Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb:
Hello,
On 06/18/08 06:11, Davey Goode wrote:
Hi All,
Traditionally for outbound routing to the PTSN world via a cisco voice
gateway we use HOC's or prefixes, has anyone ever looked at
incorporating the x-route-tag feature to replace the HOC/ prefix
Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb:
On 06/25/08 12:33, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb:
Hello,
On 06/18/08 06:11, Davey Goode wrote:
Hi All,
Traditionally for outbound routing to the PTSN world via a cisco
voice gateway we use HOC's or prefixes, has anyone ever
Dan Pascu schrieb:
On Thursday 19 June 2008, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Dan!
Dan Pascu schrieb:
...
operators do not work in all cases? What about the TLS implementation
which is practically useless for end user devices, and even for proxy
to proxy connections can render your proxy
Dan Pascu schrieb:
On Friday 20 June 2008, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Dan Pascu schrieb:
On Thursday 19 June 2008, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Dan!
Dan Pascu schrieb:
...
operators do not work in all cases? What about the TLS
implementation which is practically useless for end user devices
Hi Dan!
Dan Pascu schrieb:
...
operators do not work in all cases? What about the TLS implementation
which is practically useless for end user devices, and even for proxy to
proxy connections can render your proxy completely unresponsive under
certain conditions?
Are you referring to
Adrian Georgescu schrieb:
On Jun 5, 2008, at 4:27 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Adrian!
I am not sure if I got it right - the MI-proxy is just a proxy. Thus
it forwards requests from the client to the MI interface of openser.
Thus, openser's (potential buggy?) MI server is still used
)
Log Message:
---
-fixed missing brackets around IPv6 addresses when building socket string
description (used by usrloc and siptrace) or directly without an IP version
check (like in nathelper).
Credits for finding a fixing this go to Klaus Darilion.
Closes bug 1950754
Hi Adrian!
I am not sure if I got it right - the MI-proxy is just a proxy. Thus it
forwards requests from the client to the MI interface of openser. Thus,
openser's (potential buggy?) MI server is still used. Thus, how does the
proxy increases stability?
thanks
klaus
Adrian Georgescu
might be interesting for openser too
regards
klaus
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: [Serdev] CVS:commitlog: sip_router NEWS cfg.lex cfg.y
core_cmd.c tcp_conn.h tcp_options.c tcp_options.h tcp_read.c
Datum: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:51:27 +0200 (CEST)
Von: Alfred E. Heggestad [EMAIL
openser is a SIP proxy, thus any header is supported.
If the request is forwarded, the header will be forwarded too unless it
is explicitly removed by remove_hf() function.
You can also add any of these headers using the append_hf() or similar
functions from textops module.
You can access the
IIRC there were also some issues with presence/presence_xml module some
time ago for storing the the presence info (XML payload) as the XML data
was sometimes not correctly interpreted (special characters, escape
sequences). But I do not know anymore if and how it was fixed.
regards
klaus
sent to the proxy.
On Monday 10 March 2008, Klaus Darilion wrote:
From the sip-implementors list - looks like Maxim is right.
regards
klaus
Robert Sparks schrieb:
Part of why it does this is to deal with the case that the first
INVITE the proxy sent actually got somewhere, but its
Dan Pascu schrieb:
That is not the case. If a 200 OK happens to come at the same time with
the CANCEL and there is a race condition and the call does get setup and
charged, I can explain my subscriber that he happened to put the call on
hook at the same time it was answered by the other
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Maxim Sobolev writes:
All this has nothing to do with the SIP, really. It just illustrates the
point that SIP proxy is bad choice for real-time VoIP accounting.
i didn't notice that someone in this discussion would have suggested to
use sip proxy for
-Original Message- From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Klaus Darilion Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 4:11 AM To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Sip-implementors]
CANCEL retransmisson question of no provisional response!
Hi!
Could someone help me please
Maxim Sobolev schrieb:
Hi,
Disclamer: we discovered this issue with OpenSER 1.3, but it might be
something affecting SER as well, so that I am cross-posting it there.
Basically it looks like there is an issue with transactional CANCEL
processing, potentially related to the presence of
Dan Pascu schrieb:
On Thursday 06 March 2008, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
The issue at hand has lead me to discovering the problem, which is hard
to observe, but the problem itself IMHO is important one and by no
means non-existing in the real world. As I said in the other message,
I've seen this
Maxim Sobolev schrieb:
Klaus Darilion wrote:
The correct behavior of the tm module in this case would be to
continue with INVITE re-transmits until we get provisional response
and immediate CANCEL once that response comes in.
Is this really the correct behavior? Is this behavior defined
Maxim Sobolev schrieb:
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Dan Pascu schrieb:
On Thursday 06 March 2008, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
The issue at hand has lead me to discovering the problem, which is hard
to observe, but the problem itself IMHO is important one and by no
means non-existing in the real world
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb:
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Maxim Sobolev schrieb:
According to my reading yes, UAC should wait either arrival of the
first provisional response or expiration of Timer B (doing due
retransmits in the meantime for unreliable transports) and send
CANCEL
Hi Ovidiu!
some questions...
does the parser support multipart mime? or do we need a multipart-mime
parser first?
is it only parsing or is there also support for manipulating the SDP
(e.g. changing codec order ...)
klaus
Ovidiu Sas schrieb:
Revision: 3860
Henning Westerholt schrieb:
On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Klaus Darilion wrote:
ok, because I often have lots of ideas, but no students :-(
Well, then why not apply for this? :-)
I thought that most people are here aware how this program works.. Basically
google sponsors each year more than
Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
2008/3/6, Klaus Darilion [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My ideas for student projects:
- gnuTLS: add gnutls support to openser, maybe make an TLS wrapper to
support several stacks (and maybe DTLS too)
- a SIP Identity implementation (which fixes the lump pre
So, we must have the students before applying to Google Summer of Code?
klaus
Henning Westerholt schrieb:
Hi all,
a few days ago the google summer of code [1] program started again. Should be
perhaps participate this year in this program? Applications are due until 12.
March.
Henning Westerholt schrieb:
On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Klaus Darilion wrote:
So, we must have the students before applying to Google Summer of Code?
klaus
Hi Klaus,
no, they apply after google choose the organisations. I added this only
because if we think that we don't have any
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Dan Pascu writes:
My guess is that this will not be easy to do as there are currently
functions that rely on this to stop processing the message and they do so
based on some internal checks/conditions that are not testable from the
script.
are you saying
Daniel Cardoso Alves wrote:
Hi people!
Is possible implement allow transcoding in Openser?
Not the server... The openser will manipulate only the SDP and send the
audio to other server...
You can manipulate the SDP manually by using regular expressions using
the functions from textops
Henning Westerholt schrieb:
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
I just read this about a new DNS resolver library. Maybe if we ever want
to change the resolver (for example to introduce a-sync DNS resolving
or DNSSEC) this might be useful piece of software.
Hi
Hi!
Unfortunately I have a meeting at this time (I guess I should buy an
organizer someday) - but I think my wishlist is already known :-)
Maybe one thing would be cool for future release: pre-applying lumps to
make signing of messages possible.
regards
klaus
Henning Westerholt schrieb:
On
Dan Pascu schrieb:
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
I just read this about a new DNS resolver library. Maybe if we ever
want to change the resolver (for example to introduce a-sync DNS
resolving or DNSSEC) this might be useful piece of software.
Klaus,
OpenSER
Hi!
I just read this about a new DNS resolver library. Maybe if we ever want
to change the resolver (for example to introduce a-sync DNS resolving
or DNSSEC) this might be useful piece of software.
regards
klaus
- Forwarded message from Olaf Kolkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
To:
Either the Contact is wrong or the TCP session is gone.
I do fix_nated contact/register and nat-pinging for all TCP clients to
avoid any issues.
regards
klaus
Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
OpenSer DVN trunk. Always I use X-Lite (using TCP behind NAT) I get this
error
in OpenSer:
Feb 14
Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
El Thursday 14 February 2008 17:46:45 Klaus Darilion escribió:
Either the Contact is wrong or the TCP session is gone.
Probably TCP session is gone, since I have never Contacts related problems
with UDP clients.
Depends on the SIP client and you NAT dedection
IMO a good idea. I think other projects name such lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
regards
klaus
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb:
Hi all,
I the last year there was a good progress on the project policy
regarding releases (major and minor). Still, from my experience as booth
developer and user of
Victor Pascual Ávila schrieb:
Jerome,
On Feb 7, 2008 7:05 PM, Jerome Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would say such a document would be terribly difficult to write as RFC
conformance also depends a lot on what you do in the configuration
scripts ...
Yes, you are right. But actually
hi!
This might be interesting for openser too.
regards
klaus
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: [Serdev] CVS:commitlog: sip_router/modules/nathelper nathelper.c
Datum: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:33:00 +0100 (CET)
Von: Maxim Sobolev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sobomax
Hi Giovanni!
Please add it to the openser bugtracker on sourceforge.
thanks
klaus
Giovanni Coriasco schrieb:
Hi,
I'm running an Openser version 1.3.0 on a Linux machine.
I think I found a bug in the permissions module. The allow_address()
and allow_source_address() operate properly
HI Adrian!
Can you recommend any clients with MSRP support?
thanks
klaus
Adrian Georgescu schrieb:
Hello,
AG Projects launches MSRPRelay, an Open Source implementation of IETF
standard RFC 4976. MSRP relay is an extension to the MSRP protocol
(RFC 4975). Its main role is to help NAT
sounds good to mee
Henning Westerholt schrieb:
Hi,
we discussed during the merging process of the db_berkeley module the
addition
of a 'db' prefix for all database modules to better seperate them from the
other modules. I've already added this prefix to the functions (and some
Hi Maxim!
Nice to see you here too.
Maxim Sobolev schrieb:
In addition to SER / OpenSER / FreeBSD, I am either active contributor
or founder/principal developer of few other opensource projects, such as
RTPproxy, Sippy B2BUA and RadiusClient-NG (now FreeRadius-Client).
If I understand
btw: What is BlackCat
regards
klaus
SourceForge.net schrieb:
Bugs item #1878330, was opened at 2008-01-23 08:56
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
http://lists.openser.org/pipermail/devel/2007-August/008792.html
I guess you have to add listen=sctp:ip.add.rre.ss:port to openser.cfg
btw: does sctp has ports as well?
regards
klaus
Nakshatra Gupta schrieb:
HI ,
I have downloaded and build the OPenSER Stack.
I am able to run the server
PS: klaus, if you log from different computers/location into sourceforge,
it will 'disconnect' you from the previous location and when you go back,
you will need to re-login (at least this is my experience with it).
Hmm - in my case it is just a single PC. Thanks anyway
klaus
Nakshatra Gupta schrieb:
Hi
Want to know if OpenSer has the support for SCTP .
yes.
http://lists.openser.org/pipermail/devel/2007-August/008792.html
klaus
Nakshatra Gupta
Assistant system engineer
Tata Consultancy Services
Cell:- 9873339863
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website:
a function located which crashes at the the first
call to a core function because it not yet resolved...
so symbol resolution is done from core to ssl plugin, but not in the
other direction which sounds weird, because the core is loaded before
ssl plugin...
2008/1/9, Klaus Darilion
Revision: 3514
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=3514view=rev
Author: klaus_darilion
Date: 2008-01-09 00:11:34 -0800 (Wed, 09 Jan 2008)
Log Message:
---
- fix ACK handling (backported from trunk)
Modified Paths:
--
Are you sure you have linked against libssl and libssl is in the library
path? Use ldd to verify the dependencies of your module.
regards
klaus
Eric PTAK schrieb:
Hi everyone,
I'm currently making an openser module which act as IM client using
libpurple, the pidgin library. I already
)
libresolv.so.2 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libresolv.so.2 (0xb7ec)
libpthread.so.0 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
(0xb7eae000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb7d7f000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x8000)
2008/1/9, Klaus Darilion
)
libpthread.so.0 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
(0xb7bdd000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x8000)
2008/1/9, Klaus Darilion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
the problem is that your module does not find ssl.so . Thus check the
dependencies of your
Revision: 3499
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=3499view=rev
Author: klaus_darilion
Date: 2008-01-03 06:33:14 -0800 (Thu, 03 Jan 2008)
Log Message:
---
- fix in-dialog SUBSCRIBE routing (backport from trunk)
Modified Paths:
--
Hi!
On http://openser.org/docs/ there should be now documentation for 1.3
too (e.g. cookbook, PV, TLS ...)
regards
klaus
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
The parameters (except transport) could be stripped from received
regards
klaus
Dan Pascu schrieb:
The reply for a REGISTER will include a received param to the contact
header which is included in double quotes. However it doesn't escape the
content before doing so which results in a bad
Hi Bogdan!
The new config lacks the (msg:len = 4096) check. Do you think this test
is obsolete?
regards
klaus
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Revision: 3284
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=3284view=rev
Author: bogdan_iancu
Date: 2007-12-06 10:56:59 -0800 (Thu,
correctly? Until yet I had only UDP packets which were splitted into 2
fragments.
regards
klaus
regards,
bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Bogdan!
The new config lacks the (msg:len = 4096) check. Do you think this
test is obsolete?
regards
klaus
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Revision
I think this was the correct solution!
thanks
klaus
Henning Westerholt schrieb:
Revision: 3255
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=3255view=rev
Author: henningw
Date: 2007-12-04 06:13:11 -0800 (Tue, 04 Dec 2007)
Log Message:
---
- disable the qop
Henning Westerholt schrieb:
Revision: 3232
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=3232view=rev
Author: henningw
Date: 2007-11-29 08:14:33 -0800 (Thu, 29 Nov 2007)
Log Message:
---
- enable qop mode for auth challenge function, as recommended in
Hi!
There were some TCP tunings which can be interesting to port to openser too.
http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/sip_router/NEWS.diff?r1=1.70r2=1.71
regards
klaus
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.openser.org
Revision: 3140
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=3140view=rev
Author: klaus_darilion
Date: 2007-11-15 03:00:25 -0800 (Thu, 15 Nov 2007)
Log Message:
---
- added doc
Modified Paths:
--
trunk/modules/maxfwd/README
66 matches
Mail list logo
