Re: [SailfishDevel] Question about connecting a Sailfish phone to Ubuntu Linux box

2019-07-23 Thread Martin Kampas
Hello Sahlan, > [...] I did that in QtCreator and chose the Build / Deploy option, and it > told me RPMs had been created OK, but, under the Issues tab, I get the > message "No RPM validation suite is available for the current Sailfish > OS build target, the package will not be validated" > >

Re: [SailfishDevel] Question about connecting a Sailfish phone to Ubuntu Linux box

2019-07-23 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
Sahlan, There is a potential routing issue, you have the same network connected to different devices (usb networking and vm/dev networks) so the machine may end up sending packets over one interface but not the other and vice versa. It's not advisable in general to work like that since you are

Re: [SailfishDevel] Question about connecting a Sailfish phone to Ubuntu Linux box

2019-07-23 Thread Sahlan
Eli, My development PCs and VMs running on OSX (about twelve in total) each use a static i.p. address from that range, but not the 192.168.2.15 address that the phone is currently set to. No devices use DHCP. Are you saying there might still be a clash with an address used by the Jolla

Re: [SailfishDevel] Question about connecting a Sailfish phone to Ubuntu Linux box

2019-07-23 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
Sahlan, Did you change your LAN to not be on 192.168.2.0/24? As mentioned previously your LAN IPs clash with the Jolla USB subnet and this *will* lead to unpredictable behavior. HTH, Eliyahu - אליהו Op di 23 jul. 2019 om 18:59 schreef Sahlan : > Hello, > > Thanks to the several people who gave

Re: [SailfishDevel] Question about connecting a Sailfish phone to Ubuntu Linux box

2019-07-23 Thread Sahlan
Hello, Thanks to the several people who gave advice on my problem, I have made progress. a) I updated my Jolla phone to the latest update it was offering: 3.0.0.8 b) I updated VirtualBox on Ubuntu to the new version 6 c) I uninstalled and reinstalled the Sailfish SDK, same version as before,

Re: [SailfishDevel] SyncML topic revived (further down the rabbit hole)

2019-07-23 Thread deloptes
Chris Adams wrote: > Hi, > > (Sorry for top posting, OWA doesn't quote properly...) > > That old PR is actually mine, if you're referring to > https://git.merproject.org/mer-core/buteo-sync-plugins/merge_requests/1 > > I think it had some issues (e.g. didn't do UUID matching properly between >

Re: [SailfishDevel] libconnman-qt application examples

2019-07-23 Thread David Llewellyn-Jones
On 22/07/2019 23:57, David Weidenkopf wrote: > Sorry, I forgot to mention an assumption on my part. Given the API > design, it looks like it is usable from QML, and no C++ would be > necessary. Is that an incorrect assumption? Hi David, I'm struggling a bit with your negatives, but... no, this

Re: [SailfishDevel] SyncML topic revived (further down the rabbit hole)

2019-07-23 Thread Chris Adams
Hi, (Sorry for top posting, OWA doesn't quote properly...) That old PR is actually mine, if you're referring to https://git.merproject.org/mer-core/buteo-sync-plugins/merge_requests/1 I think it had some issues (e.g. didn't do UUID matching properly between client and server, so it was more