On 12/7/2014 11:33 AM, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
However, the main thing that motivated me to dig into the issue and
send the mail was libsailfishapp. That library is, AFAIK, only
relevant on Sailfish, and also requires one to add special code in
main(). That can't be done at
There, you said
- technical or policy).
Attila
On 12/5/2014 11:05 AM, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
El Friday 05 December 2014, Attila Csipa escribió:
I would rather have packagesExist fixed (I also ran into this one, see
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-42499 :)
Didn't know that. I found this instead:
https
Hi,
I would rather have packagesExist fixed (I also ran into this one, see
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-42499 :)
A (philosophical?) problem is that from Qt's perspective, Sailfish is
not really an
OS - that would be Linux - but merely a distro. Once you start down this
, but rather having a common language for UIs
powered by whatever is the best tech choice on the given platform
(QtQuick, Silica, QML components wrapping native APIs, you name it).
Best regards
Attila Csipa
On 8/22/2014 11:12 AM, Ville M. Vainio wrote:
Hey,
We discussed this on twitter already
.
Exactly. Store QA (harbour or any other) is largely *NOT* about
security/privacy/quality. It's just about sanity-checking the basic
functionality of the app.
Best regards,
Attila Csipa
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
that prevent me from getting
(hopefully cool) stuff to people.
Best regards,
Attila Csipa
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
On 12/02/14 16:06, . . wrote:
help needed. new to Qt and Sailfish development (but not new to C++)
does anyone know how i can build a console application for Sailfish
that uses Qt? i only want to use certain Qt classes with no UI.
i must be missing something in my .pro file as the compiler
On 09/02/14 14:52, David Greaves wrote:
On 09/02/14 11:28, Putze Sven wrote:
As pointed out from others, it's not simply done with the Qt documentation.
The Sailfish OS is built upon many libraries, frameworks and layers. But
which one is to use?
Qt.
Seriously. You asked for an API. Jolla
it.
Best regards,
Attila Csipa
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
On 08-Nov-13 13:48, Michal Jerz wrote:
So it is actually a matter of *ALTERNATIVE COST*. Make it sufficiently
cumbersome (and possibly also risky) and at least SOME people will find
paying $1 simply EASIER and QUICKER than bothering with not so easily
installable and potentially risky stuff. Or
(which is the smallest problem). Dependency
resolution, search, update notifications, etc would still have to be
done somehow.
Best regards,
Attila Csipa
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
On 07-Nov-13 13:40, Jonni Rainisto wrote:
DRM has nothing to to do with with copy protection.
Copy protection *is* one of the cornerstones of DRM (which, arguably, is
a lot broader term). Feel free to check wikipedia :)
Hopefully that answered your question.
Not quite :) What I'm
On 07-Nov-13 13:42, Michal Jerz wrote:
So it's like with door locks. Despite none of them being 100% proof to
unauthorized opening, somehow people continue to use them in their doors
rather than just having doors without any locks only because they're not
100% secure. They at least REDUCE abuse.
On 07-Nov-13 15:51, Mohammed Hassan wrote:
Not quite :) What I'm interested in is what *will* be there (or,
rather, what resources will it limit) as opposed to what is NOT
going to be there (whether not having Aegis there is good, or bad,
depends on what you will have there instead is better or
point, where the platform is too small
for real piracy to exist, but then the question is - who wants to remain
a small player? And if you get big, that scheme will not help you
anyway, so why make it?
Best regards,
Attila Csipa
___
SailfishOS.org
On 06-Nov-13 03:06, Karl Granström wrote:
Today we're launching Jolla Harbour harbour.jolla.com, the portal for
submitting applications to the Jolla Store.
You can submit and manage your applications. Consumers will be able to install
them directly from their Jolla phones.
The dry dock and
On 06-Nov-13 13:05, Roberto Colistete Jr. wrote:
- current (2013) smartphones are fast (dual or quad core @ 1,0 GHz,
fast flash memory, etc), equivalent to low cost net/notebooks some years
ago, so it is not a problem to have repositories with thousands of
packages;
Luckily we all live in the
in this
context.
Best regards,
Attila Csipa
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
On 24-Oct-13 12:49, FIlip Kłębczyk wrote:
Writing a native Sailfish app will allow your app to have better UX and
best integration with the platform. So the interface will be more
A question regarding this occured to me - is any platform functionality
exposed in the Android layer? Ie. if I
On 13/03/13 23:14, David Greaves wrote:
On 13/03/13 20:29, Attila Csipa wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if Sailfish has or plans to have any qmake level scoping or
ifdeffing to make development for multiplatform projects less painful? I
understand Sailfish is just Linux, but just Linux doesn't imply
20 matches
Mail list logo
