-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org]
on behalf of kaa [k...@iol.cz]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 2:22 PM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Scriptlets in RPM hot allowed to Harbour
.. runned as root .. because doing work on root level.
Simple apps like life years/months/days
...@lists.sailfishos.org
[devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org] on behalf of kaa [k...@iol.cz]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 2:22 PM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Scriptlets in RPM hot allowed to Harbour
.. runned as root .. because doing work on root level.
Simple apps like
...@iol.cz]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 2:22 PM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Scriptlets in RPM hot allowed to Harbour
.. runned as root .. because doing work on root level.
Simple apps like life years/months/days are nice, but we need many
better, stronger, under-skin
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Scriptlets in RPM hot allowed to Harbour
.. runned as root .. because doing work on root level.
Simple apps like life years/months/days are nice, but we need many
better, stronger, under-skin apps..
Like Profilematic, call blocker/recorder/assist
Hi
2014/1/21, kaa k...@iol.cz:
[...] Crap [...] Bla, bla , bla .. FUD .. bla bla bla [...] LOL [...]
bullshit [...] Howgh [...]
Thank you for valuable feedback. :)
IMHO, it makes sense to have both, Harbour and OpenRepos. You can compare
those in their function to Maemo Extras and Maemo
21.1.2014 21:34, Martin Grimme:
You can compare
those in their function to Maemo Extras and Maemo Extras Devel in the old N900
days.
Everybody could upload to Extras Devel, but to get stuff into Extras, it had
to pass a quarantine and a (IMHO slow and frustrating) QA phase.
Only Extras was
On 21 Jan 2014, at 21:39, Mohammed Hassan mohammed.has...@jollamobile.com
wrote:
Each store has an audience. Harbour has its own audience as well as openrepos.
This is exactly what I'm thinking, Openrepos is very appealing to me for
example,
but wouldn't I recommend it for my mother who
Developers
Subject: [SailfishDevel] Scriptlets in RPM hot allowed to Harbour
Why RPM scriptlets not allowed to harbour?
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
All run as user:
(Aside: the chum repository is something I'm doing with my community hat on,
not my Jolla one. It's intended to be run ***and QA'ed*** by the community. More
on this 'soon')
On 11/01/14 21:45, Semuonov Basil wrote: I guess, that I am the person who
started this story about
On Sunday 12 January 2014 11.21.56 Filip Kłębczyk wrote:
So what would be the proper way of creating such app? Can someone from
Jolla - Thomas or anyone there who feels competent in this area suggest
the proper way of handling such use case. That could really help to
mitigate some of the
W dniu 12.01.2014 14:14, Mikael Hermansson pisze:
To clarify... What I meant is app itself need no root. ofcourse user
still need to pass root password to libssh to execute commands...
well it sounds like a solution, but I would say it's a bit partisan type
of thing. Anyway I would like to
Why RPM scriptlets not allowed to harbour?
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
: [SailfishDevel] Scriptlets in RPM hot allowed to Harbour
Why RPM scriptlets not allowed to harbour?
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
.
From: devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org [devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org]
on behalf of Andrey Kozhevnikov [coderusin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 11:22 AM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: [SailfishDevel] Scriptlets in RPM hot allowed to Harbour
] Scriptlets in RPM hot allowed to Harbour
Why RPM scriptlets not allowed to harbour?
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
___
SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
There are reasons for chmod 666 in /usr/share/appname
Also i'm using scriptlets for closing my applications before
installation new version/remove and so on
On 11.01.2014 18:34, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
El Saturday 11 January 2014, Andrey Kozhevnikov escribió:
you suggested to change
El Saturday 11 January 2014, Andrey Kozhevnikov escribió:
There are reasons for chmod 666 in /usr/share/appname
There are reasons for being 666 permissions, I got that, but isn't it possible
the make that directory with such permissions as default?
Sorry, I'm trying to understand the problem.
So how else can we update sudoers...? No custom package manager could be
done without it.
--
Marcin
2014/1/11 Thomas Perl th.p...@gmail.com
Duty calls[1]...
tl;dr: No postinst scripts in Harbour. chmod 666 stuff in /usr/ is wrong.
On 11 Jan 2014, at 13:51, Martin Kolman
Hi Marcin,
On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 16:49 +0100, Marcin M. wrote:
So how else can we update sudoers...? No custom package manager could
be done without it.
As I understand it you don't need to be root to carry out package
management tasks on Sailfish due to the way it implements packagekit,
Hi,
Sorry, I forgot about PackageKit! ;) I was still in the apt world :)
Regards,
--
Marcin
2014/1/11 Mike Sheldon m...@mikeasoft.com
Hi Marcin,
On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 16:49 +0100, Marcin M. wrote:
So how else can we update sudoers...? No custom package manager could
be done without
comes to device.
From: devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org [devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org]
on behalf of Semuonov Basil [basil.semuo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 11:45 PM
To: devel@lists.sailfishos.org
Subject: [SailfishDevel] Scriptlets in RPM
21 matches
Mail list logo
