Hi All,
Paul pointed me to the devel list with an idea that I have... The
discussion started after seeing that some Motorola phones (V3i) does
not include the x-wap-profile HTTP header. From the spec's it turned
out that this header is not madatory (to my great surprise!).
I am playing with a
Hi Stipe,
On 5/26/06, Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you be open to a HTTP interface in mbuni that, if configured,
will make a HTTP (get/post) to a configured URL with the user-agent as
parameter.
This external service will then return a profile for the device. Maybe this
Hi,
Small patch to add a MIME-Version header into outbound emails. Some
mailers do not display the content properly when this header is not
present...
mimeversion-header.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@mbuni.org
Hi,
We are seeing that some subscribers, when submitting to more than one
destination at a time, will separate the fields with a space (and not
a comma as they should). I will like to make a small modification to
the source in order for mbuni to include the space into the parsing.
Thing is that
Hi Paul,
On 6/26/06, Paul Bagyenda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deon,
Short answer is that it isn't. The spec says that if there are
multiple recipients, then the message will contain the To/Cc/Bcc
field as many times are there are recipients. This means that the
user should not, as in the
Hi,
(not sure if this should be on the users list???)
Our MMSC is configured with: notify-unprovisioned = false. We do this
because we have a mms-to-local-copy-handler VASP configured that
receives a copy of all MMS. This handler will also do the is
destination handset MMS enabled check. If
Hi Paul,
On 7/25/06, Paul Bagyenda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deon,
Not a bad idea at all. Would the additional parameter to the notify-
script then mean that the message-too-large field is not needed? (Or
we could just leave it as empty to signal nothing-to-send).
I kept all the other
Hi,
This patch will add the current msgid to the notify script if it is present.
On 7/25/06, Deon van der Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Paul,
On 7/25/06, Paul Bagyenda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deon,
Not a bad idea at all. Would the additional parameter to the notify-
script
Hi,
Related to the interworking... In mmsc/mmsglobalsender.c's method:
mms_sendtoproxy there is the call to send the actual email out:
x = mms_sendtoemail(from, pto,
subject ? subject : settings-mms_email_subject,
msgid, msg, 0,
Hi All,
I am tracing an issue with regard to MM4_delivery_report.REQ messages
to other MMSC's. The From: field is set to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. The other MMSC is expecting this field to
be the number for the handset to which the message was sent in the
first place. Like MSISDN/[EMAIL PROTECTED].
10 matches
Mail list logo