[RSB PATCH] sb: Add sb-rtems-pkg to update the RTEMS package hashes and checksums

From: Chris Johns --- source-builder/sb-rtems-pkg | 29 source-builder/sb/download.py | 5 +- source-builder/sb/git.py | 12 ++ source-builder/sb/rtemspkg.py | 279 ++ 4 files changed, 324 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100755

[RSB PATCH] rtems: Update RTEMS packages to their HEAD

From: Chris Johns --- rtems/config/tools/rtems-kernel-6.cfg | 4 ++-- rtems/config/tools/rtems-libbsd-6.cfg | 4 ++-- rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-6.cfg | 6 +++--- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-kernel-6.cfg

qemu-linaro and linaro-image-tools is olde

Hello all, I am trying to emulate beagle black board and support for beagle board on qemu in past can be achieved by qemu-linaro but from last 10 years there is not activity on the community of qemu-linaro and it is use many depreciated packages and hard to got it work anyone tried it or using it.

Re: [Bugfix rtems-lwip 1/4] Fix definition of portTICK_RATE_MS

On 1/4/2024 9:49 am, Bernd Moessner wrote: > The FreeRTOS define portTICK_RATE_MS must represent the time in ms > between two system ticks. > --- > rtemslwip/xilinx/xlwipopts.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/rtemslwip/xilinx/xlwipopts.h

Re: Finished Hello World Example

This patch looks ok. We also need a screenshot of it running. I hope you made the deadline of applying via the Google site. We track proposals at https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2024 On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 2:47 PM SEAN TANG wrote: > > ___ > devel

Finished Hello World Example

From a580cedc186d11ab6fc8ca4329404bf8e6e64dd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Tang Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 02:13:32 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Finished Hello World Example --- testsuites/samples/hello/init.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: Clarification Regarding Initial Project Scope for "Add BSP for Polarfire based Beagle"

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 9:28 AM Purva Yeshi wrote: > Hello, > > I'm reaching out to seek clarification regarding the initial scope of the > "Add BSP for Polarfire based Beagle" project that I've applied for. > > As outlined in the project description, the primary aim is to create a BSP > for the

Clarification Regarding Initial Project Scope for "Add BSP for Polarfire based Beagle"

Hello, I'm reaching out to seek clarification regarding the initial scope of the "Add BSP for Polarfire based Beagle" project that I've applied for. As outlined in the project description, the primary aim is to create a BSP for the Beagle-V Fire board. Therefore, one part of the project involves

Re: [Bugfix rtems-lwip 4/4] Fix crash due to link_detect_thread

I'd have to see what you're describing. If you'd like, I can reformulate the patch as well. Kinsey On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 2:51 AM Bernd Moessner wrote: > Is it ok to implement it using a single ifdef __rtems__ else ? The driver > is already a ifdef - hell and it will become even less readable

Please Review GSOC proposal after recommended changes

I have made recommended changes in my proposal proposal ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

revised proposal for posix conformance project, GSoC

Updated my proposal according to comments. Any comments welcome! https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iwgzx72TZ0aokNLww-y-IlyEkaRCovjGUhpdQXdP9mg/edit?pli=1 -- *"Free society* *Has, at its core, privacy* *You must act in trust." - *Salyzyn ___ devel

Request for Review: Updated Proposal of the project "Add BSP for Polarfire based Beagle"

Hello, I am Purva Yeshi, and I am reaching out to follow up on the proposal that I previously shared with you. After receiving valuable suggestions from members of this community, I have made significant changes to the proposal to address the feedback received. I am now reaching out to kindly

Re: [Bugfix rtems-lwip 4/4] Fix crash due to link_detect_thread

Is it ok to implement it using a single ifdef __rtems__ else ? The driver is already a ifdef - hell and it will become even less readable when I add even more of them. Kinsey Moore schrieb am Mo., 1. Apr. 2024, 16:39: > The intent of this patch is fine, but changes should be purely additive >

Re: [Bugfix rtems-lwip 3/4] Correct the task prio of link_detect_thread

Running SMP on zynq7000 - my theory was that u might use QEMU. Kinsey Moore schrieb am Mo., 1. Apr. 2024, 16:35: > You might be seeing different behavior than I have if you're running > single-core. Almost all my lwIP usage has been on 4 cores on the ZynqMP. > > Kinsey > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024