RE: [RFC] Adding RISC-V Vector support to RTEMS

2024-04-04 Thread Ken.Unger
Just a late note to say thanks for the direction Sebastien. What you suggest makes sense to me, requiring (and enforcing) that vector registers not be used within _RISCV_Interrupt_dispatch() while preserving the vector state across _Thread_Do_dispatch(). (ref:

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dev/serial: Add ZYNQ_UART_[01]_BASE_ADDR

2024-04-04 Thread Chris Johns
On 4/4/2024 8:19 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 28.03.24 16:48, Kinsey Moore wrote: >> This patch set looks good to me. I'd suggest a different file for the versal >> unless there's a good name that can easily cover both. > > The versal BSP doesn't use this driver and seems to have a

Re: Introduction and preparation for the "Add BSP for Polarfire based Beagle" Project

2024-04-04 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
Hi Purva, On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 6:05 AM Purva Yeshi wrote: > Hello, > > I am Purva Yeshi, I applied for the project "Add BSP for Polarfire based > Beagle" for GSoC 2024. I proposed a project to create a BSP for the > Beagle-V fire board from scratch. The primary objective of the project is >

Introduction and preparation for the "Add BSP for Polarfire based Beagle" Project

2024-04-04 Thread Purva Yeshi
Hello, I am Purva Yeshi, I applied for the project "Add BSP for Polarfire based Beagle" for GSoC 2024. I proposed a project to create a BSP for the Beagle-V fire board from scratch. The primary objective of the project is to run a "Hello World" code and a ticker on the board. After that, I will

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dev/serial: Add ZYNQ_UART_[01]_BASE_ADDR

2024-04-04 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 28.03.24 16:48, Kinsey Moore wrote: This patch set looks good to me. I'd suggest a different file for the versal unless there's a good name that can easily cover both. The versal BSP doesn't use this driver and seems to have a different hardware UART interface. It uses a BSP-specific