From: Chris Johns
---
tester/rt/pygdb/spark.py | 2 +-
tester/rt/test.py| 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tester/rt/pygdb/spark.py b/tester/rt/pygdb/spark.py
index 0eac365..b669998 100644
--- a/tester/rt/pygdb/spark.py
+++
From: Chris Johns
---
rtemstoolkit/execute.py | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rtemstoolkit/execute.py b/rtemstoolkit/execute.py
index 31d3a8a..c7d8134 100755
--- a/rtemstoolkit/execute.py
+++ b/rtemstoolkit/execute.py
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
from
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024, 7:31 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to run the python code we own through yapf and it's default to
> standardise the formatting and to being it inline with the coding
> standards. It
> would be good to do this before we branch for RTEMS 6.
>
> I can crate a
Hi,
I would like to run the python code we own through yapf and it's default to
standardise the formatting and to being it inline with the coding standards. It
would be good to do this before we branch for RTEMS 6.
I can crate a patch and post if required but it will be noise and doubt anyone
On 18/4/2024 4:16 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 18.04.24 04:02, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 17/4/2024 11:06 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> Make the kernel I/O output character device processing configurable
>>> through an option set parameter. Add RTEMS_NO_OUTPUT and RTEMS_FLUSH
>>> options. The
> On Apr 18, 2024, at 10:55 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 9:50 AM Peter Dufault wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 18, 2024, at 10:34 AM, Kinsey Moore wrote:
> >
> > A patch for EEXIST here should be fine. It would be nice if the caller were
> > more resilient.
> >
>
>
> On Apr 18, 2024, at 10:55 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 9:50 AM Peter Dufault wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 18, 2024, at 10:34 AM, Kinsey Moore wrote:
> >
> > A patch for EEXIST here should be fine. It would be nice if the caller were
> > more resilient.
> >
>
>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 2:00 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hallo Joel,
>
> it would be nice to have the interrupt get/set priority directives in
> RTEMS 6. When do you want to create the RTEMS 6 branch?
>
Last spring.
Seriously, Chris has been cutting 6.1 rc
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 9:50 AM Peter Dufault wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 18, 2024, at 10:34 AM, Kinsey Moore
> wrote:
> >
> > A patch for EEXIST here should be fine. It would be nice if the caller
> were more resilient.
> >
>
> I also changed "default-network-init.h" to assert rtems_bsd_initialize()
> On Apr 18, 2024, at 10:34 AM, Kinsey Moore wrote:
>
> A patch for EEXIST here should be fine. It would be nice if the caller were
> more resilient.
>
I also changed "default-network-init.h" to assert rtems_bsd_initialize() worked.
sc = rtems_bsd_initialize();
assert(sc ==
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 9:18 AM Peter Dufault wrote:
> I just rebased to "6-freebsd-12". This change:
>
> ###
> commit 62e0ca8283603573d42a0f15da044cd406a2f00a
> Author: Kinsey Moore
> Date: Tue Jan 23 13:25:45 2024 -0600
>
> rtemsbsd/rtems: Check function return values
> ###
>
I just rebased to "6-freebsd-12". This change:
###
commit 62e0ca8283603573d42a0f15da044cd406a2f00a
Author: Kinsey Moore
Date: Tue Jan 23 13:25:45 2024 -0600
rtemsbsd/rtems: Check function return values
###
[dufault@gen6 rtems-libbsd]$ git diff 6514d561587fd1527fe6a26cb43e6b5742c8c779
Hallo Joel,
it would be nice to have the interrupt get/set priority directives in
RTEMS 6. When do you want to create the RTEMS 6 branch?
--
embedded brains GmbH & Co. KG
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94
On 18.04.24 04:02, Chris Johns wrote:
On 17/4/2024 11:06 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Make the kernel I/O output character device processing configurable
through an option set parameter. Add RTEMS_NO_OUTPUT and RTEMS_FLUSH
options. The goal of this API change is to enable flushing the kernel
14 matches
Mail list logo
