On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Gareth wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, but is this feature
planned for the next release (4.44)?
Is it being worked on?
Sore point.
Several drivers supported rotated desktops either in 4.2 or before 4.3.
A new extension (RandR - Rotate and Resize)
--- Kendall Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit : David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frankly, your own rants against XFree86 and some
of its volunteers
recently are no different than this. It sure left
a bad taste in
our mouths. There is a sickening propensity
towards hostile and
Hi!
Can this be of any help?
http://www.gnu.org/software/xnee/
Xnee can record, distribute and replay X (X11) protocol data. This is
useful for automated tests of applications or benchmarking of
applications. ...think of it as a robot.
/hesa
On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 20:15, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
Sven Goethel writes:
sorry for being lazy and not RTFM, but
after i send a patch to the patch email addy,
and i have received an acknowledge ..
- how long does it takes to get an answer - usually
- will it happen to get no answer at all ?
Hm, how long ago did send the email?
I
cvsup.xfree86.org isn't providing a CVS service today.
anoncvs.xfree86.org is, so this isn't urgent.
Is this a technical problem, or is cvsup.xfree86.org being phased out ?
--
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is very useful when dealing with programs of a 5-10 year vintage that
were originally developed under X-Windows when 8 bit displays were the
best you could get.
Since most 8 bit displays used PseudoColor (read Pallete based), they
have particular hard-coded logic to deal with the color map.
mobile devices will always have more limitations,
so you wont get rid of any sort of low bpp formats.
in multi buffer environments, such as OGL with front,
back, depth, stencil, overlay, whatever you will be
in need to deal with any sort of pixel depth at the
same time as well.
for imaging
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When exactly have I 'ranted' against XFree86 and some of it's volunteers?
I felt personally attacked beyond what might be considered
reasonable by you in some of the forum discussions in April this
year.
Because I stated my opinion that everyone
I apologize if this is the wrong list send me to the right one. I am
a novice at XFree, and working to timelines on a captive product within a
company. We are doing real time data acquisition, with a Linux box being
the over-arching controller.
I created a driver for a Microtouch touch
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 03:58:28PM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
cvsup.xfree86.org isn't providing a CVS service today.
anoncvs.xfree86.org is, so this isn't urgent.
Is this a technical problem, or is cvsup.xfree86.org being phased out ?
It was a technical problem (fixed now), however
I understand the need for 8bit displays to support legacy apps;
however, RandR (or RENDER? or a combination of the two?) is
(or will be) able to support 8bit visuals on a 24bpp display.
I am wondering if giving up a guaranteed and constant amount of
memory bandwidth on a platform that shares
11 matches
Mail list logo
