Re: Reengineering X applications

2004-05-31 Thread Suresh
Hi, Latency is not an issue, I am looking at a deployment where I have a 1MBPS upstream and 6MBPS downstream bandwidth, The bandwidth issue comes from the fact that the number of users is going be high, a few hundreds. Hence the effective bandwidth per user is going to drop with the number of

Re: Reengineering X applications

2004-05-31 Thread Andrew C Aitchison
Suresh asked: Has anyone come across X applications re-engineered for low bandwidth networks, This in the context of thin clients. On Mon, 31 May 2004, Suresh clarified: Latency is not an issue, I am looking at a deployment where I have a 1MBPS upstream and 6MBPS downstream bandwidth,

Re: SOLVED: 1400x1050 on a Dell 510m

2004-05-31 Thread Christian Zietz
Hi, Alain Poirier schrieb: The 0.2 version of 855resolution is now available. [...] Can you test it (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/apoirier/) ? As I wrote earlier, I don't have 1400x1050 on my Dell Inspiron 500m but 855resolution now reports the correct values and I was able to undefine the

Re: SOLVED: 1400x1050 on a Dell 510m

2004-05-31 Thread Nqnsome
Hi, First of all, thanks to everybody for trying to make things work. Now, to the problem. I have this brazilian notebook, Novadata N8800, actually a Compal CY27 (?), or similar. Using lspci, I get for the graphics card: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. 82852/855GM Integrated