Re: [Dri-devel] Re: XFree86 bugzilla available

2003-03-21 Thread Jos Fonseca
No DRI developer expressed his interest or opposition, probably because there isn't opposition, or simply no interest. In either case I see no reasons why not proceed, so I'll open a bug to address this. I'll ask that [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the same addressed used on SF BT system) is set as the

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: XFree86 bugzilla available

2003-03-21 Thread Keith Whitwell
José Fonseca wrote: No DRI developer expressed his interest or opposition, probably because there isn't opposition, or simply no interest. In either case I see no reasons why not proceed, so I'll open a bug to address this. I'll ask that [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the same addressed used on SF BT system)

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: XFree86 bugzilla available

2003-03-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fre, 2003-03-21 at 21:07, José Fonseca wrote: No DRI developer expressed his interest or opposition, probably because there isn't opposition, or simply no interest. In either case I see no reasons why not proceed, so I'll open a bug to address this. I'll ask that [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the same