Re: [Pfaedit-devel] Re: [forum] Re: Choosing an extension for bitmap-only SFNTs

2003-07-20 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
GW Ok, I'm currently posting a new build of PfaEdit which will generate GW embedded bitmap opentype fonts with extension .otb Considering the lack of serious objection to .otb, I consider it adopted. GW (PfaEdit is currently generating 'OTTO', which is appropriate for GW opentype fonts). I'm

Re: [Pfaedit-devel] Re: [forum] Re: Choosing an extension for bitmap-only SFNTs

2003-07-15 Thread George Williams
That was the initial plan, but I found out that having FreeType grok such fonts required more changes than David Turner was wililng to make in the 2.1.* series. So I'm generating a zero-length glyf and a one-entry loca. (No EBSC indeed.) Ok, I'm currently posting a new build of PfaEdit which

Re: [Pfaedit-devel] Re: [forum] Re: Choosing an extension for bitmap-only SFNTs

2003-07-14 Thread George Williams
After reading carefully the replies, the current front-runner is ``otb'', for ``OpenType Bitmap''. Is that extension used up yet? DD With the proviso that there has been some research to determine DD that nobody else is already using an extension for fonts like When PfaEdit generates a (non-mac)