On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 19:05, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
The current plan for addressing the second two is to do it as part of
the 'libic' library so the same code can be used in the X server and in
the software fallbacks for Cairo. I think a couple of people have taken
a look at doing that
Would I be correct in the assumption that the only accelerated path for xrender
(Bis the identity transform (1:1 scale)? all other transforms are done in
(Bsoftware? (my initial tests here with xfree86 4.3.0 nvidia's latest drivers
(B(as of about a month ago) seem to indicate as much...) (and
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 05:59:54 +0100 Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 02:27:13PM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
Would I be correct in the assumption that the only accelerated path for
xrender is the identity
At 10:05 PM +0200 8/11/03, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 05:29, Alex Deucher wrote:
well, yeah... I only mention if in case anyone out there feels like
adding basic transparency support to a driver. the driver could then
register it's own version of the Xtransparency extension so
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 02:27:13PM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
Would I be correct in the assumption that the only accelerated path for xrender
is the identity transform (1:1 scale)? all other transforms are done in
software? (my initial tests here with xfree86 4.3.0
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 05:59:54AM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 02:27:13PM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
Would I be correct in the assumption that the only accelerated path for xrender
is the identity transform (1:1 scale)? all other transforms are done in
software?
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 05:59:54 +0100 Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Bbabbled:
(B
(B On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 02:27:13PM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
(B Would I be correct in the assumption that the only accelerated path for
(B xrender is the identity transform (1:1 scale)? all other
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 02:27:13PM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
Would I be correct in the assumption that the only accelerated path for xrender
is the identity transform (1:1 scale)? all other transforms are done in
software? (my initial tests here with xfree86 4.3.0 nvidia's latest drivers
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 13:59:18 -0700 (PDT) Mark Vojkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Bbabbled:
(B
(BRENDER is slow, so that's not surprising.
(B
(Byes. i'm getting the drift. :) it was slow 2 years ago. i was kind of hoping
(Bit'd moved on since then. i started work on using it and found at the
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 14:07:16 -0700 (PDT) Mark Vojkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Bbabbled:
(B
(B On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
(B
(B On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 05:59:54 +0100 Alan Hourihane
(B [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
(B
(B On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 02:27:13PM +1000, Carsten
On 11 Aug 2003 11:08:33 -0400 Owen Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
(B
(B On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 19:05, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
(B
(B The current plan for addressing the second two is to do it as part of
(B the 'libic' library so the same code can be used in the X server and in
(B the
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 10:59:19AM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
to the best of my knowledge, no. i remember it being discussed, but keith was
very particular on a client being able to depend on the exact output of render
so software and hardware/render routines could match. i can't find
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:02:32AM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
though i've said it before, xrender really should be an easily accessible 2d
subset of opengl and pixel-exact rendering as it defines limits the ability to
accelerate it - either with tricks in software (by losing 1 bit of
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 14:27:13 +1000 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
(B
(B Would I be correct in the assumption that the only accelerated path for
(B xrender is the identity transform (1:1 scale)? all other transforms are done
(B in software? (my initial tests here
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 03:22, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 22:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Mark Vojkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
Would I be correct in the assumption that the only accelerated path for
xrender is the identity
15 matches
Mail list logo
