On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 07:22:33AM +0100, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
I've been forgetting to report this for a while.
It started happening around the 2nd September.
I run
make WORLDOPTS=-k World
and all (I think) the tinyx directories report problems with
make target distclean. This is
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 03:37:29AM +0900, Takaaki Nomura wrote:
I've tested 4.6.99.2 static/loader servers on Linux and FreeBSD.
The servers didn't work. The problem didn't occur with 4.6.99.1.
I've attached the servers' logs and gdb stack trace of the static
server.
I committed the following
, 4.7.0, is planned for the first half of 2007. If you
find XFree86 useful and would like to help support our work, please visit
our donations page:
http://www.xfree86.org/donations/
Enjoy.
David
--
David Dawes X-Oz Technologies
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 12:07:49PM +0100, Barry Scott wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:17:11AM +0100, Barry Scott wrote:
David,
Can you tell me if this is supposed to work? If not why not?
It is supposed to work. The i810 driver (for = i830) handles modes
differently
.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
David Dawes X-Oz Technologies
www.XFree86.org/~dawes www.x-oz.com
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 02:30:28PM -0400, David Dawes wrote:
The fourth release candidate for XFree86 4.6.0 is now available. The source
tarball can be found at:
ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/develsnaps/XFree86-4.5.99.904.tar.bz2
Preview documentation for the 4.6.0 release is at:
http
with 4.5.99.903 on NetBSD
To: devel@XFree86.Org
Hi,
I send David Dawes a mail last month that there was a problem with
his change #231.
Not all problems were fixed since then.
I don't recall it -- it probably got lost amongst the spam.
The remaining problem is that you can't use
#define
, and send me any documentation
updates that you may have. The latest version of xtest (4.0.14) can
be found at:
ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/xtest/XFree86-xtest-4.0.14.tar.bz2
David
--
David Dawes X-Oz Technologies
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:52:52PM +0900, Takaaki Nomura wrote:
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:27:36 -0400, David Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 08:39:47PM +0900, Takaaki Nomura wrote:
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:27:29 -0400, David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 08:22:39PM +0900, Takaaki Nomura
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 08:39:47PM +0900, Takaaki Nomura wrote:
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:27:29 -0400, David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 08:22:39PM +0900, Takaaki Nomura wrote:
I've tested 4.5.99.903 on FreeBSD and Linux.
When I terminated the server on Linux, I couldn't return
I've put a copy of the preview documentation for the upcoming 4.6.0
release at:
http://www.xfree86.org/~dawes/pre-4.6/
If you have any additions or corrections, please let me know. In particular
send release notes updates, and updates to the credits sections.
David
--
David Dawes
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 08:22:39PM +0900, Takaaki Nomura wrote:
I've tested 4.5.99.903 on FreeBSD and Linux.
When I terminated the server on Linux, I couldn't return to
the console and the root window remained.
The problem didn't occur on FreeBSD.
I've attached the server log below.
Are there
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 09:55:11AM -0400, David Dawes wrote:
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 03:07:45PM -0500, Sergey Babkin wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if it's a good idea to cc: to both X.org and
XF86 mailing lists, but the subject is kind of useful
for both.
I've attached the patch that adds word
. It addressed the
problems of this type that I saw. Try 4.6.0 RC3 and let me know if
you still see the problem.
David
--
David Dawes X-Oz Technologies
www.XFree86.org/~dawes www.x-oz.com
The third release candidate for XFree86 4.6.0 is now available.
The source tarball can be found at:
ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/develsnaps/XFree86-4.5.99.903.tar.bz2
Please report problems/success, etc here.
David
--
David Dawes X-Oz Technologies
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:58:40PM +0900, Takaaki Nomura wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:57:58 -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 11:13:46PM +0900, Takaaki Nomura wrote:
I've tested 4.5.99.902 with i810 based built-in card on Linux..
Server worked, but console blacked out after I
characters.
Can you try the current CVS version? I fixed a couple of problems
since 4.5.99.902 that might be contributing to what you are seeing.
If that doesn't make any difference, the problem might be related to
recent 830/845/865/etc driver changes.
David
--
David Dawes
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 09:02:31AM +0100, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 07:22:51AM +0100, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, David Dawes wrote:
While looking into this, I did find a bug in fontconfig where memory
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 07:22:51AM +0100, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, David Dawes wrote:
While looking into this, I did find a bug in fontconfig where memory
could get freed twice. I don't see the same symptoms, but this problem
does happen in code paths that get used when
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:38:10AM +, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, David Dawes wrote:
The second release candidate for XFree86 4.6.0 is now available.
The source tarball can be found at:
ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/develsnaps/XFree86-4.5.99.902.tar.bz2
.
Mark.
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 08:52:00PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
initdata is still NULL even after your call to LoaderSymbol() in
that patch.
The module name needs to be prepended. Something like:
if (!initdata
) {
initdata = LoaderSymbol(md);
xfree(md);
}
}
David
Mark.
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 06:57:17PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
I can't get CVS to load NVIDIA's GLX module. It complains:
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib
(untested) patch may solve this particular problem. Let me know
how it goes.
David
--
David Dawes X-Oz Technologies
www.XFree86.org/~dawes www.x-oz.com
Index: loadmod.c
===
RCS
here.
David
--
David Dawes X-Oz Technologies
www.XFree86.org/~dawes www.x-oz.com
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:53:41AM -0800, Tom Williams wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:54:02PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:23:17AM -0800, Tom Williams wrote:
Hi! I just installed the XFree86 4.5.99.901 snapshot (which fixed my
xterm
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 05:28:02PM -0800, Thomas Dickey wrote:
CVSROOT: /home/x-cvs
Module name: xc
Changes by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/03/12 17:28:02
Log message:
241. Xterm patch #210 (Thomas Dickey).
This reinstates the following warnings on Solaris 9:
xterm.h:243: warning:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 06:49:49PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, David Dawes wrote:
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 05:28:02PM -0800, Thomas Dickey wrote:
CVSROOT: /home/x-cvs
Module name: xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/03/12 17:28:02
Log message:
241. Xterm patch
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 05:31:00AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, David Dawes wrote:
The first release candidate for XFree86 4.6.0 is now available.
The source tarball can be found at:
ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/develsnaps/XFree86-4.5.99.901.tar.bz2
that's nice.
I'm
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 12:35:20AM +0900, Takaaki Nomura wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 18:56:38 -0500,
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 08:39:25AM +0900, Takaaki Nomura wrote:
I've tested static/loader servers on FreeBSD and Linux.
The servers didn't start
The first release candidate for XFree86 4.6.0 is now available.
The source tarball can be found at:
ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/develsnaps/XFree86-4.5.99.901.tar.bz2
David
--
David Dawes X-Oz Technologies
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:06:16AM -0800, bruno schwander wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed some manpages and documentation is missing from the release
information available at http://xfree86.org/current/RELNOTES4.html .
Can you give some examples of what is missing?
Are these web pages automagically
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 08:39:25AM +0900, Takaaki Nomura wrote:
I've tested static/loader servers on FreeBSD and Linux.
The servers didn't start with the following error.
Can you send your config file?
David
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@XFree86.Org
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 02:31:23PM +, Barry Scott wrote:
I'm running 4.5.99.18 and having problems with supporting HDReady panels.
The HDReady panels support [EMAIL PROTECTED] typically.
Using the i810 driver on a i945G with the i915resolution hack I can
get the driver to set 1360x768 but not
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 04:41:10PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
CVSROOT: /home/x-cvs
Module name: xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/01/24 20:32:10
Log message:
187. Add two new functions that can be used to scroll the content of an
Xaw viewport from outside the
We are planning to release XFree86 version 4.6.0 in the next two-three
months. The details of the release schedule have not been finalised yet,
but I'll post them here when they are.
If you have new work or updates that you would like to see included in
the upcoming 4.6.0 release, they should be
I have some updated patches for adding support to gdb for debugging
XFree86 modules. The patches are for gdb versions 5.3, 6.0, and
6.4, and I've tested them on NetBSD, FreeBSD and Solaris/x86 in
addition to Linux. The patches are based on the original work that
Paul Flinders did for earlier
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:17:02AM +0100, Marco Longhin wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile xfree 4.5.0 with uClibc 0.9.27 (mipsel).
My question:
Is possible to compile xfree without floating point?
uClibc don't have all functions of libm, and xfree need floating point.
Portions of XFree86 do
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 09:14:40AM -0800, Tim Roberts wrote:
Jeff Chua wrote:
The following patch is needed in order to compile trident_video.c with
gcc-2.95.3 ...
---
xfree86/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/trident/trident_video.c.org
2005-12-09 12:05:15 +0800
+++
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 09:21:34AM -0800, Tim Roberts wrote:
Anybody know why there were a set of messages from two weeks ago
(including this one) that are just showing up today?
It is a side-effect of the member-only posting restriction that helps
keep this list spam-free. It can be avoided
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 12:35:19PM +0100, Barry Scott wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:56:16AM +0100, Barry Scott wrote:
I'm using the Unichrome driver with XFree86 4.5.0 and I'm hitting
problems trying to use their latest code.
I sent the previous message to fast
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:56:16AM +0100, Barry Scott wrote:
I'm using the Unichrome driver with XFree86 4.5.0 and I'm hitting
problems trying to use their latest code.
What problems are you hitting?
David
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@XFree86.Org
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 01:21:55PM -0400, Michael wrote:
Hello,
the attached patch adds DDC2/I2C support to the tdfx driver which has
the distinct advantage to work anywhere since it doesn't depend on the
vbe module. It will try DDC2 first and if that fails fall back to the
old vbe stuff when
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:01:42PM -0400, Michael wrote:
Hello,
I don't see why they should be enabled - they're PC-specific and even
with x86 emulation they would be pretty much useless since you're not
too likely to encounter a graphics board with PC firmware in a Mac (
or other PowerPC
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 07:06:22PM -0400, Michael wrote:
Hello,
Is the implication here that plugging a PC PCI graphics card into
a powerpc machine will never work (as a secondary display), even
if the software driving it knows how to initialise it in the absence
of OpenFirmware?
Of course
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 09:30:26PM -0400, Michael wrote:
Hello,
Marc appears to have fixed various issues for int10/vbe on non-x86
platforms as part of his sparc work. Perhaps some of those same
issues prevented this stuff from working on powerpc in the past and
so these #ifdef's can be
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:49:49AM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:45:15AM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
Our loader scheme has been, and is, reasonably good at dealing with
incompatibilities between modules and the core
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:45:15AM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
Hi.
I've something here I'd like to discuss.
Our loader scheme has been, and is, reasonably good at dealing with
incompatibilities between modules and the core binary. But it is not so
good with ensuring modules are
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 02:16:50PM +0100, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, Karthik Ramamoorthy wrote:
Hi,
xrandr is not working in my Dual Mnitor setup. In my
/etc/X11XF86Config file. it i disable Xinerama then xrandr is working
properly. But my Dual Configuration is not
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 11:50:37AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Hi,
running X without configuration file works, except that the mouse
defaults to a PS/2 mouse, whereas, under MirOS, it's always a wsmouse.
Does anyone have a quick hint where I can patch this, before I go
looking myself? (Yes, I
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 01:45:37AM +0200, Dejan Lesjak wrote:
On Saturday 25 of June 2005 23:14, David Dawes wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 01:39:57PM +0200, Dejan Lesjak wrote:
There's a tweak for xf86cfg Cards database at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/32121
I wonder
seem to be in accordance to
made Imake.rules change.
I would modify the Imakefiles to add an AllTarget() for such files.
David
--
David Dawes X-Oz Technologies
www.XFree86.org/~dawes www.x-oz.com
the following
to Xserver/os/tiny/Imakefile:
#define DDXOsColor YES
David
--
David Dawes X-Oz Technologies
www.XFree86.org/~dawes www.x-oz.com
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@XFree86.Org
http
against the same files) will not contain these
modifications (i hope).
David
--
David Dawes X-Oz Technologies
www.XFree86.org/~dawes www.x-oz.com
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@XFree86.Org
http
lacking 2 years ago, when i started
fixing (hacking around) the key-event processing in X server.
David
--
David Dawes X-Oz Technologies
www.XFree86.org/~dawes www.x-oz.com
___
Devel
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 04:00:54PM -0700, bruno schwander wrote:
BTW, I submitted the source for the magictouch driver on this mailling
list, is there any chance it will appear in the XFree86 tree someday ? If
a comitter needs changes, fixes to it or has questions, I'll be happy to
help as I can.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:53:47AM -0400, Fred Gleason wrote:
On Friday 10 June 2005 03:17, Veikko Werner wrote:
actually a great thing to have, but not that easy.
The main problem is, that the driver itself has to be disabled.
Why so? AFAICT, we basically need two things:
1) The ability to
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 08:05:43AM -0700, bruno schwander wrote:
I have my driver for the serial MagicTouch touchscreen working. There is
just one thing that I am not sure of: if the resolution is changed
dynamically (by some program running fullscreen for example), the scaling
is off. How do I
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:43:48PM -0400, Michael wrote:
Hello,
That's good. Even better, especially for the modular driver, would be
to handle this automatically in the driver at run-time. The mouse
driver does this and should handle auto-detection of wscons support on
NetBSD for mouse
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 08:11:25PM -0400, Michael wrote:
Hello,
right now I'm struggling to get XFree86 properly supported on
NetBSD/sparc and sparc64 and one problematic point is the keyboard
handling.
With
Option Protocol wscons
Option Device /dev/wskbd0
things work reasonably well but the
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 02:37:59PM -0400, Michael wrote:
Hello,
Ideally it should automatically determine when wscons mode is
needed.
Ok, on NetBSD that would be always, none of the pre-wscons ports runs
XFree as far as I can tell. So - some ( like x86 ) might not exactly
/need/ it but they
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:09:16AM -0700, Mike Urban wrote:
I do not know the proper 'channel' for this sort of feedback, but we
have for some time been using the following enhancement for 'xon' that
others might find useful. We do not run remsh/rcmd/rsh servers on our
systems. So we add a new
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 02:19:33PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
David Dawes dixit:
Another useful data point might be a delay loop in place of the usleep().
I was going to try that today, replacing the call usleep in the .s
file with a simple delay loop, but checked first if it still failed
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 08:30:55PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
David Dawes dixit:
Does replacing the fprintf with sleep(1) make a difference?
Even with usleep(1), glxgears still works. I've committed that
as a temporary workaround now, till we discover the real problem.
This points
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:42:20PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
since I'm a BSD developer, the natural place to look for me regarding
the xc/lib/font/fontfile/decompress.c sources (Keith Packard said it
was derived from some ancient BSD sources) is our own source tree.
Voilà, there it is -
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 10:46:46PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
This one goes deep into i386 interna...
I still wonder if there is an issue related to libpthread.
Dixi:
Looks like a compiler bug to me.
Okay, it doesn't.
I have generated two assembly files, x1 and x2, to be the
output of the
The XFree86 mailing lists have been modified on an experimental
basis to require subscription for posting. Perhaps this will be
enough to eliminate the 0.1% of spam that our existing filtering
does not already catch. The existing filtering (spam assassin plus
a home-grown filter) will remain in
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:52:47AM -0700, Torrey Lyons wrote:
Bugzilla #1576 and the fix committed for it is only partially right.
The patch applewmExt.h is right, but patching the imported Mesa code
in extras/Mesa/include/GL/internal/dri_interface.h is the wrong thing
to do and likely has
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 05:35:17PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
David Dawes dixit:
Can you try running glxgears with ktrace or truss (or something like that),
and see how that compares with apps that work OK?
Sure.
Here's the ktrace and systrace -A output for glxgears (does not work
natively
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 07:46:17AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
David Dawes dixit:
First of all, thanks for the continued support!
Sure thing, XFree86 has provided us with a stable X implementation
long enough, no reason to fix what ain't broke.
What is the policy there for bumping shared
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 07:52:28AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Alex Deucher dixit:
and two for bsd
1. bsd monolithic
2. bsd-coremodular as above
why not just let the kernel provide the drm? Most if not all recent
linux and bsd kernels (last few years) have drm
First of all, thanks for the continued support!
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 09:53:22PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Hi all,
I've built it through, and most of the stuff works for me.
Before updating, you will have to remove /usr/X11R6 in its entirety,
as I've reverted from cloning OpenBSD
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 12:37:28PM +0100, N?meth M?rton wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:45:07PM +0100, N?meth M?rton wrote:
Marc Aurele La France ?rta:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, [ISO-8859-2] N?meth M?rton wrote:
Starting XFree86 4.4.99.903 using the s3 driver at mode 1024x768
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:45:07PM +0100, N?meth M?rton wrote:
Marc Aurele La France ?rta:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, [ISO-8859-2] N?meth M?rton wrote:
Starting XFree86 4.4.99.903 using the s3 driver at mode 1024x768 8bpp
I see the following screen:
0 303 1023
|
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 09:24:24PM +0100, N?meth M?rton wrote:
Hi!
The version number of the xtest is not updated in the file
test/xsuite/NOTES.xf86
Thanks for pointing that out -- I'll fix it.
David
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@XFree86.Org
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 12:54:47PM +, Matthias Scheler wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:37:06PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
How about the attached patch?
I just pulled OpenBSD-current's Xpm source into NetBSD. It has fixes
for this vulnerability and various other bug fixes from X.org.
I
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 04:32:00PM +0100, Frank Gie?ler wrote:
Unfortunately, the new file xc/Install breaks the install target on
filesystems that are case insensitive. Can this be fixed?
The easiest solution is probably to append .txt to the top level doc
files.
David
The third XFree86 4.5.0 release candidate is available. Source and
some binaries can be found at:
ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/snapshots/4.4.99.903/
Documentation is at:
http://www.xfree86.org/4.4.99.903/
Preview documentation for 4.5.0 is at:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:18:38PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 06:51:54PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
I've been auditing various builds and noticed that
xc/lib/GL/mesa/drivers/x11 is never built, let alone referenced
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 08:32:30AM +, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
I'm not sure why this change from January
to xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Globals.c
is only biting now but:
It's a more recent change to xf86Privstr.h. I see that Marc has committed
a fix for this (removing the
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 08:40:55AM +0100, N?meth M?rton wrote:
Mark Vojkovich ?rta:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Tim Roberts wrote:
N?meth M?rton wrote:
Hi!
I've tested 4.5.0RC2 with xtest 4.0.10, see
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1557 for details.
I've attached a test C program which
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 06:51:54PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
Hi.
I've been auditing various builds and noticed that
xc/lib/GL/mesa/drivers/x11 is never built, let alone referenced. Is this
an oversight, or can this directory be deleted?
It is supposed to be built and referenced when
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 05:24:19PM +0800, Liu Lijuan wrote:
hello:
Lately I am working on Xserver(TinyX). In the process, I found that
tinyX startup is
not very fast in embedded system. I read its startup codes and found the font
initialization speeds lots of time. Do you have other
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 06:03:41PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 11:55:58AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 10:05:38AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
But isn't it better to move forward than backwards ?
If the result is no better, then we need to fix
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 01:34:40AM +0100, Németh Márton wrote:
Hi!
I've downloaded XFree86 4.4.99.901 from
ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/snapshots/4.4.99.901/binaries/Linux-ix86-glibc23/
and run xtest 4.0.8 against it.
There was some tests which failed:
XCopyArea
XDrawArc
XDrawArcs
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 10:52:33AM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 06:07:43PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
It used to be that if you specified a modeline, say 1600x1200 in
the XF86Config file, that modeline would take preference
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 11:55:58AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 10:05:38AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
But isn't it better to move forward than backwards ?
If the result is no better, then we need to fix the problems found. Going
back to an older version, and just because
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 06:07:43PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
It used to be that if you specified a modeline, say 1600x1200 in
the XF86Config file, that modeline would take preference over any
internal modelines of the same name. This no longer appears to be
the case. If I have a 1600x1200
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:34:16AM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 07:40:40PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 04:00:18PM
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 02:50:23PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:34:16AM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 07:40:40PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 04:00:18PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
I just updated on my dual-card system and with the update I see
a problem restoring the console that I did not see previously. If
I startx on the primary card and then quit, the primary card is restored
correctly. However, if I
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 07:40:40PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 04:00:18PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
I just updated on my dual-card system and with the update I see
a problem
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:55:16AM -, Charles Dobson wrote:
Yes, thanks for pointing that out. I missed that in my haste
to post. It seems that the Silicon Motion video BIOS relies on
a undocumented feature of the CPU.
This leaves me in a dilemma, should I post my changes
to Bugzilla or
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:08:20AM -, Charles Dobson wrote:
I am not sure if I should post this here or on bugzilla.
Definitely here so that more people will see it and have a chance
to comment.
While trying to get a Silicon Motion SM722 video controller
working with Solaris, I have
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:14:59PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
Some have said here today that the drivers can adapt to older DRM
versions. That's how it should be, but I don't know if it is true
or not. I've seen some things in my initial testing that may cast
some doubt on it, but there were too
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 10:05:38AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:14:59PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:52:27PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:40:07PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:24:43PM +
It looks like the DRM kernel source in xc/extras/drm is broken and
incomplete, especially for BSD platforms. The Linux version only
appears to build for a narrow range of kernels, and this either
needs to be fixed, or the minimum kernel requirements enforced in
the Makefile.
Perhaps we'll have
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:40:42PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:32:56AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
It looks like the DRM kernel source in xc/extras/drm is broken and
incomplete, especially for BSD platforms. The Linux version only
appears to build for a narrow range
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:12:29PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:59:15AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:40:42PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:32:56AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
It looks like the DRM kernel source in xc
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:24:43PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:17:50PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:12:29PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:59:15AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:40:42PM +
The first XFree86 4.5.0 release candidate is available. Source and
some binaries can be found at:
ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/snapshots/4.4.99.901/
Documentation is at:
http://www.xfree86.org/4.4.99.901/
Preview documentation for 4.5.0 is at:
1 - 100 of 481 matches
Mail list logo
