MLF I think the best thing to do here is to recode DPS to rely on xtrans.
Shall we remove libdps from the tree?
Juliusz
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 15 Jul 2003, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
MLF I think the best thing to do here is to recode DPS to rely on xtrans.
Shall we remove libdps from the tree?
Why? Is DPS dead? It's just a matter of time before I find the time to
convert it. And that doesn't preclude someone else beating me to
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
../../lib/xtrans/Xtranssock.c: At top level:
../../lib/xtrans/Xtranssock.c:1315: `MAXHOSTNAMELEN' undeclared here (not in a
function)
Is there some other file that needs to be included to
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Todd T. Fries wrote:
Looks good to me (sorry for my previous email, I should have checked this
mailbox first).
Is there known any OS that does not have
IPV6_JOIN_MULTICAST/IPV6_LEAVE_MULTICAST ? I understand you provide the
defines for backwards compatibility, but I'd
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
CVSROOT: /home/x-cvs
Module name: xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/07/09 08:27:41
Log message:
300. X.Org IPv6 changes (Bugzilla #227, Alan Coopersmith, Marc La France).
See
Marc Aurele La France wrote:
- Incorporate X.Org responses to comments #'s 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12,
13, 14 and 15 (taken from an X.Org-internal document dated 2003.06.17).
I'm still working on a second round of patches for the X.org review
to incorporate the changes from the
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Marc Aurele La France wrote:
- Incorporate X.Org responses to comments #'s 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12,
13, 14 and 15 (taken from an X.Org-internal document dated 2003.06.17).
I'm still working on a second round of patches for the
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
I had to make the following change to get the code to
compile on OpenBSD, where IPV6_ADD_MEMBERSHIP is not defined.
According to Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, from the Kame project
and *BSD's IPv6 guru, IPV6_{ADD,DROP}_MEMBERSHIP are obsoleted and
I have no objection if the semantics are the same. I was merely
following Steven's Unix Network Programming (Vol 1 2nd Ed) which
predates this change in the RFC's and did not realize they had been
changed.
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. -
