Le dimanche 10 janvier 2010 08:06:11, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
rineau:BADSOURCE:figtoipe-20080505.tar.gz:figtoipe
rineau:BADSOURCE:ipe-6.0pre32patch1-src.tar.gz:ipe
Does the change of URLs of Source0 worths a rebuild in Rawhide, or is the cvs
commit sufficient?
--
Laurent Rineau
Laurent Rineau wrote:
Le dimanche 10 janvier 2010 08:06:11, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
rineau:BADSOURCE:figtoipe-20080505.tar.gz:figtoipe
rineau:BADSOURCE:ipe-6.0pre32patch1-src.tar.gz:ipe
Does the change of URLs of Source0 worths a rebuild in Rawhide, or is the cvs
commit sufficient?
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:36:18PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 04:21:08PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:06:11AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
rjones:BADURL:expat-2.0.1.tar.gz:mingw32-expat
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All!
2010/1/13 Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com:
I'm orphaning nagios, nrpe and nagios-plugins. I just don't use them
anymore. If you use them and want to help out, get too it!
I can take nagios and
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:52 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
- Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
So is --as-needed within the current default flags?
As far as I know, no. The default will still be --no-as-needed.
That's correct. This change does not affect
Pierre-Yves pingou-e11oz7vxvvoxcrstzzn...@public.gmane.org writes:
IMHO R2spec is here to help packagers to create/generate spec file
as close as possible to the Fedora standards.
Fedora's RPM will never be generated fully automatically and be
maintained without human intervention that's
But, you have added an explicit dependency upon libdb to your executable
by mentioning -ldb on the gcc command line. Therefore libdb will be
loaded at execution start-up. But libdb has a dependency upon
libpthread, so that library will also be loaded at execution start-up.
Hence when
On Wed, 13.01.10 16:07, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de writes:
There's something else that came to my mind: if libxml2 is loaded into
memory indirectly because some dlopen'ed module wanted it, and then
used, and then unloaded again because the
Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com said:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote:
Thanks, Seth. And if we don't, what's a good resource for security
auditing n00bs?
1) Look over the change history. Don't trust the source repository but
