Going purely by upstream support status, yes, GConf2 should be retired;
it’s been obsolete for a decade.
Going by dependent packages, it’s not so simple. Some of these
dependencies are no doubt spurious, optional, or otherwise “removable;”
others are real hard dependencies from
Dne 26. 02. 24 v 15:51 Richard Hughes napsal(a):
If the SPDX listing isn't using src.fedoraproject.org and instead
using something like bugzilla please yell. Being listed as maintaining
all those also makes the packager-dashboard basically useless for me
too.
I am using a script:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 02:51:34PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 15:07, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > * 23711 spec files in Fedora
>
> I was looking through the list for any of my packages, and I've found
> that I'm "maintaining" long dead packages like
>
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 09:44, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 15:44, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > I wonder if you have it from a group you are in or if it was the general
> creep of time that has added you to a lot of packages?
>
> I'm a packager and a provenpackager, so I'm a bit
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 15:44, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> I wonder if you have it from a group you are in or if it was the general
> creep of time that has added you to a lot of packages?
I'm a packager and a provenpackager, so I'm a bit confused why I'm on
so many packages as a separate
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 09:54, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 15:07, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > * 23711 spec files in Fedora
>
> I was looking through the list for any of my packages, and I've found
> that I'm "maintaining" long dead packages like
>
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 15:07, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> * 23711 spec files in Fedora
I was looking through the list for any of my packages, and I've found
that I'm "maintaining" long dead packages like
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/GConf2
According to that I have "commit" ACLs, but I
