Dear Paul, Somehow CVS sources are strange anyway, changelog finishes on 2005-07-15 and tree is very unlike the 1.1.0 traball tree. Am i missing something or the actual CVS now located somewhere outside of SourceForge?
Regards, Anton. 1 2005-02-05 P. A. Bagyenda <bagyenda@@dsmagic.com> 2 * Initial release 0.9.6 3 2005-02-20 P. A. Bagyenda <bagyenda@@dsmagic.com> 4 * Added support for sending from/to IP addresses, new mms-client-ip-addr param 5 * Generalised determination of local vs non-local recipients. 6 * Fixed bug with message forwarding on MM1 7 * Fixed bug in mmsproxy when message fetched but fetch not confirmed. 8 * Added access.log 9 * various minor bug fixes 10 2005-02-20 Soren Hansen <sh@@warma.dk> 11 * New config directives: resolver-module-parameters, resolver-library 12 2005-04-13 P. A. Bagyenda <bagyenda@@dsmagic.com> 13 * Added mmbox support 14 * Added MM7/SOAP support 15 2005-04-18 P. A. Bagyenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16 * Added MM7/EAIF support 17 2005-06-01 P. A. Bagyenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 18 * Code fixups to allow compilation with gcc 4.0 without warnings/errors 19 * Minor bug fixes 20 2005-07-01 P. A. Bagyenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21 * Fixed mime conversion bug in content adaptation module 22 2005-07-08 P. A. Bagyenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 23 * Improved parsing of content-id header by kannel 24 * Culling of extra headers in Email2MMS 25 2005-07-14 P. A. Bagyenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 26 * accept content type */* as include SMIL in content adaptation module 27 2005-07-15 P. A. Bagyenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 28 * Allow turning on/off of content adaptation On 10 August 2006 20:02, Paul Bagyenda wrote: > I should also add that CVS was not affected, and it is > advisable that you use CVS, as it contains a number of > significant improvements of v1.1 > > P. > > On Aug 10, 2006, at 16:09, Anton wrote: > > Thanks for answer Paul! Great product! > > > > On 10 August 2006 18:19, Paul Bagyenda wrote: > >> Hi Anton, > >> > >> No such thing has happened. The truth is that we had > >> a bit of 'problem' with the server, resulting in *all* > >> the files being lost. We are rebuilding the site from > >> backups. I am slowly populating the 1.1.0 stuff back > >> on there, right now the sources are in place, RPMs > >> should be up by end of week. > >> > >> I hope that answers your concerns? > >> > >> Paul. > >> > >> On Aug 10, 2006, at 11:53, Anton wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> Can anyone tell where MBUNI sources gone? For some > >>> time there is only things prior v1.0 both in > >>> downloads and CVS - looks like someone plans to > >>> release 1.1.0 as a commercial product... > >>> > >>> Rgards, > >>> Anton. > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Devel mailing list > >>> Devel@mbuni.org > >>> http://mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/devel_mbuni.org > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Devel mailing list > >> Devel@mbuni.org > >> http://mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/devel_mbuni.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Devel mailing list > > Devel@mbuni.org > > http://mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/devel_mbuni.org > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@mbuni.org > http://mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/devel_mbuni.org _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@mbuni.org http://mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/devel_mbuni.org