(also make rtnl_do() return negative or 0, not the message length)
Signed-off-by: Dan Smith
---
net/checkpoint_dev.c | 16 +---
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/checkpoint_dev.c b/net/checkpoint_dev.c
index 2787892..df8b16a 100644
--- a/net/checkpo
This set extends the existing network socket, device, and namespace support
in the checkpoint tree to cover routing information. It does so by making
heavy use of RTNETLINK to dump and insert routes much like userspace would.
Because the task doing the checkpointing or restarting needs to examine
This helper allows kernel routines to create a socket in a given netns,
instead of forcing it to the initial or current one.
I know this seems like it's violating the netns boundary. The intended
use (as in the following patches) is specifically when talking to RTNETLINK
in another netns for the
Signed-off-by: Dan Smith
---
net/checkpoint_dev.c |7 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/checkpoint_dev.c b/net/checkpoint_dev.c
index 7ccb899..2787892 100644
--- a/net/checkpoint_dev.c
+++ b/net/checkpoint_dev.c
@@ -136,11 +136,12 @@ static struct nlms
This patch adds support for checkpointing and restoring route information.
It keeps enough information to restore basic routes at the level of detail
of /proc/net/route. It uses RTNETLINK to extract the information during
checkpoint and also to insert it back during restore. This gives us a
nice
DS> Signed-off-by: Dan Smith
I went too deep with my send-email command line. This patch isn't
related to the others, so please disregard.
--
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: da...@us.ibm.com
___
Containers mailing list
contain...@lists.l
Hi,
for checkpoint/restart
(http://www.linux-cr.org/git/?p=linux-cr.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/ckpt-v21-rc1)
of open files, we basically use __d_path passing in the fs->root of
the container init. If the supplied root is replaced by __d_path,
then we refuse checkpoint, assuming the file is not r
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:54 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:21:04 +0900
> Daisuke Nishimura wrote:
>> > The only reason to use trylock in this case is to prevent deadlock
>> > when running in a context that may have preempted or interrupted a
>> > routine that already hol
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:17 -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
> - lock_page_cgroup(pc);
> + /*
> +* Unless a page's cgroup reassignment is possible, then avoid
> grabbing
> +* the lock used to protect the cgroup assignment.
> +*/
> + rcu_read_lock();
Where is the
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:17 -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
> +static void mem_cgroup_begin_page_cgroup_reassignment(void)
> +{
> + VM_BUG_ON(mem_cgroup_account_move_ongoing);
> + mem_cgroup_account_move_ongoing = true;
> + synchronize_rcu();
> +}
btw, you know synchronize_rcu() is _r
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:17 -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
>
> This is an interesting idea. If this applies to memcg dirty accounting,
> then would it also apply to system-wide dirty accounting? I don't think
> so, but I wanted to float the idea. It looks like this proportions.c
> code is good is at
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:17:38 -0700
Greg Thelen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:54 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:21:04 +0900
> > Daisuke Nishimura wrote:
> >> > The only reason to use trylock in this case is to prevent deadlock
> >> > when running in a context th
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:57:06 +0200
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:17 -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
> > +static void mem_cgroup_begin_page_cgroup_reassignment(void)
> > +{
> > + VM_BUG_ON(mem_cgroup_account_move_ongoing);
> > + mem_cgroup_account_move_ongoing = true;
> >
13 matches
Mail list logo
