The following patch enables lndir to skip subversion admin directory
.svn while creating links:
Index: lndir.c
===
--- lndir.c (revision 9)
+++ lndir.c (working copy)
@@ -222,6 +222,8 @@
continue;
Hi,
I have found UseKoi8RForCyrillic option is only referenced in
X11.tmpl and xfree86.cf. Nowhere in the rest of the tree depends on
it, so I guess it can be safely nuked.
Jun-Young
--
Bang Jun-Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL
Suzy Deffeyes wrote:
Is appendix C of xlib.ps a good source?
http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/doc/hardcopy/X11/xlib.PS.gz
IMO, this reference is not very detailed and needs significant expansion to
be a useful resource.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Suresh Chandra Mannava wrote:
Is there any C++ code in Xfree86-4.2.0 source?
I believe that GLU or something else GL related may have c++ code.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mario Klebsch wrote:
xlib is just a small layer on top of the XLib protocol. So what should
be gained by using a different implementation?
But without digging to deep into that question, does freedesktop only
provide an alternative xlib or do they offer an alternative to XFree
(providing a
Hi!
Am Samstag, 10.01.04 um 13:40 Uhr schrieb Warren Turkal:
Mario Klebsch wrote:
But without digging to deep into that question, does freedesktop only
provide an alternative xlib or do they offer an alternative to XFree
(providing a complete set of libraries (xlib, Xt, Xaw, ...) and the
imake
Hi
I am currently testing the 4.3.99.902 release on an Radeon 9200. Debian
Sid It is much more stable than the 901 release for me. And i had only one lockup
so far (and i was'nt able to trace the error back to xfree since linux
2.6.0 also had some problems). It was a hard lockup, so couldn't do
Mario Klebsch wrote:
Am Samstag, 10.01.04 um 13:40 Uhr schrieb Warren Turkal:
I never understood why so many people consider these autotools easier
to use than the imake system. Imake (or to be precise, the config files
included with X11) knows everything about the local X11 installation,
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Mario Klebsch wrote:
They are not - within the imake build system. Outside it, there are two
issues
a) accommodating mis-installed or obsolete imake config files
b) setting different compile-time options.
included with X11) knows everything
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Warren Turkal wrote:
I believe that we have it working in all gcc based build environments that
it can.
sigh:
as you're probably aware, an application that builds only with gcc is
completely uninteresting to me.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 02:28:45PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
I tried a while back to get the libX11 in XF86 to include pkgconfig files
needed to do this kind of thing. You all didn't see the point. I would
still like to do that if there is any interest in making autotools work
better with the
On Thursday 08 of January 2004 22:28, Martin MOKREJ wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:44:05PM +0100, Martin MOKREJS wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:11:59PM +0100, Martin MOKREJS wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004,
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Tim Krieglstein wrote:
Hi
I am currently testing the 4.3.99.902 release on an Radeon 9200. Debian
Sid It is much more stable than the 901 release for me. And i had only one lockup
so far (and i was'nt able to trace the error back to xfree since linux
2.6.0 also had some
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 07:30:03PM +0100, Tim Krieglstein wrote:
Hi
I am currently testing the 4.3.99.902 release on an Radeon 9200. Debian
Sid It is much more stable than the 901 release for me. And i had only one lockup
so far (and i was'nt able to trace the error back to xfree since linux
Hi!
Am Samstag, 10.01.04 um 21:28 Uhr schrieb Warren Turkal:
You could just install X11 somewhere on your system, make a copy of
xmkmf, imake and its configuration, edit the config files according to
your needs and compile the X11 programs using your new configuration.
No changes should be
I discovered two problems (and have attached basic fixes) with the fbdev
code. First, rotation (portrait mode) is messed up; disabling xrandr in
the fbdev driver fixes this (though xrandr should probably only be
disabled when rotation is specified in XF86Config, as is done in the sis
driver; my
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 22:07, Jonathan Thambidurai wrote:
I discovered two problems (and have attached basic fixes) with the fbdev
code. First, rotation (portrait mode) is messed up; disabling xrandr in
the fbdev driver fixes this (though xrandr should probably only be
disabled when rotation
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:31:05AM -0500, Eric Wittry wrote:
I have attached an updated set of changes to this message. This set includes
all the fixes of my previous message and adds code to check that the driver has
been passed a supported bit depth. As of now. the driver will simply core dump
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 10:07:15PM -0500, Jonathan Thambidurai wrote:
I discovered two problems (and have attached basic fixes) with the fbdev
code. First, rotation (portrait mode) is messed up; disabling xrandr in
the fbdev driver fixes this (though xrandr should probably only be
disabled when
19 matches
Mail list logo
