On 26.09.2012, at 13:16, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quarta-feira, 26 de setembro de 2012 14.28.46, Иван Комиссаров wrote:
What i'm trying to say, 3 years ago Jira was used at least - qt devs were
looking at it, testing if bug reproduces, asked to provide more info
sometimes. Now there's COMPLETE s
IIRC, in Debian with Qt3 and Qt4 we did have both libs installed without
problems. With respect the other stuff:
- qmake, moc et al.: we used divertions (an apt facility) to let the user
choose which one to use on compiling stuff. Binaries were renamed upon
packaging to qmake-qt3/qmake-qt4 and
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:40 AM, André Somers wrote:
> Op 26-9-2012 9:32, d3fault schreef:
>> I don't have a git clone and gerrit set up atm otherwise I'd submit
>> it. Can someone else do it for me?
> Well, this sounds like a fine time to get such a setup then?
>> And another semi-OT question re
On 27/09/12 11:58, Thiago A. Corrêa wrote:
> I've submitted this changeset:
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,35790 and qdoc complains
> about an override in documentation. Basically, the two
> QSqlQuery::value signatures are identical except that one is a
> template method and the o
Hi,
I've submitted this changeset:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,35790 and qdoc complains
about an override in documentation. Basically, the two
QSqlQuery::value signatures are identical except that one is a
template method and the other is a simple method returning QVariant.
S
Hi Thiago,
On Wednesday September 26 2012, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> But note that there's one stricter requirement: the forwards compatibility
> that applies within a patch series. Adding this new virtual within the same
> patch series means a new, public symbol, which could get used in
> applicat
Hi!
We started publishing code coverage results of Qt 5 unit test runs as
produced by our tool Squish Coco:
http://download.froglogic.com/public/qt5-squishcoco-report/ (results)
http://download.froglogic.com/public/effectively-testing-qt5-using-squishcoco/
(setup and example)
>From that
Hi all,
I wrote a while ago that 'I haven't found a stock native MinGW 64 bit package
yet that can compile Qt 5 + Qt Creator.' And since I get cited on this I guess
it's time to correct it :)
Thanks to personal efforts of various people both on the Qt side (namely
Jonathan Liu), as well as on
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Chu [mailto:step...@ju-ju.com]
> Sent: 26. september 2012 15:55
> To: Shaw Andy
> Cc: Иван Комиссаров; Konstantin Tokarev; development
> Subject: Re: [Development] What's with bugreports.qt-project.org?
>
> On 9/26/12 6:44 AM, Shaw Andy wrote:
> > I a
On 9/26/12 6:44 AM, Shaw Andy wrote:
> I am just going to specifically refer to this part in my capacity as
> Head of Support at Digia. But the support team (myself included) do
> strive to fix bugs or provide workarounds, we have a good track
> record in this respect. It is as a result of custom
On quarta-feira, 26 de setembro de 2012 13.54.10, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> In
>
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#patch,unified,35581,1,/COMMIT_MSG
>
> we have a discussion about whether to reimplement a virtual method (the
> obvious way to fix this bug, as was done in the Qt 5 patc
On Wednesday 26 September 2012 13:54:10 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> In
>
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#patch,unified,35581,1,/COMMIT_MSG
>
> we have a discussion about whether to reimplement a virtual method (the
> obvious way to fix this bug, as was done in the Qt 5 patch), or
Hi there,
In
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#patch,unified,35581,1,/COMMIT_MSG
we have a discussion about whether to reimplement a virtual method (the
obvious way to fix this bug, as was done in the Qt 5 patch), or to avoid doing
so.
In this case, code which gets recompiled will get the
On quarta-feira, 26 de setembro de 2012 14.28.46, Иван Комиссаров wrote:
> What i'm trying to say, 3 years ago Jira was used at least - qt devs were
> looking at it, testing if bug reproduces, asked to provide more info
> sometimes. Now there's COMPLETE silence.
Considering I fixed a bug yesterday
> 26.09.2012, в 14:15, Konstantin Tokarev написал(а):
>
> 26.09.2012, 11:09, "Иван Комиссаров" :
> >> I would like to ask a question - what's with Qt Jira? Does any people
> >> really
> look at it and fix bugs? For the past 2 years, situation get worse and worse -
> 3-4 years ago bugs were fix
26.09.2012, в 14:15, Konstantin Tokarev написал(а):
26.09.2012, 11:09, "Иван Комиссаров" :
>> I would like to ask a question - what's with Qt Jira? Does any people really
>> look at it and fix bugs? For the past 2 years, situation get worse and worse
>> - 3-4 years ago bugs were fixed rather ra
26.09.2012, 11:09, "Иван Комиссаров" :
> I would like to ask a question - what's with Qt Jira? Does any people really
> look at it and fix bugs? For the past 2 years, situation get worse and worse
> - 3-4 years ago bugs were fixed rather rapid. Nowadays it seems noone even
> looking at Jira. I
On 26 September 2012 11:27, haithem rahmani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to cross-compile the qt-5.0.0beta1 for an embedded system.
> I'm configuring it as following:
>
> ./configure -xplatform linux-armv7-g++ -prefix /home/rahmanih/qt-5.0.0-beta
> -opensource -confirm-license -force-pkg-config -no
Op 26-9-2012 9:32, d3fault schreef:
> I don't have a git clone and gerrit set up atm otherwise I'd submit
> it. Can someone else do it for me?
Well, this sounds like a fine time to get such a setup then?
> And another semi-OT question relating to documentation: how are we
> synchronizing wiki edits
Ahh that makes sense. Thank you!
Here is my proposed change for the documentation regarding the return
value from waitForFinished() :
Returns true if the process finished; otherwise returns false (if the
operation timed out, if an error occurred, or if this QProcess is
already finished. Note that
I would like to ask a question - what's with Qt Jira? Does any people really
look at it and fix bugs? For the past 2 years, situation get worse and worse -
3-4 years ago bugs were fixed rather rapid. Nowadays it seems noone even
looking at Jira. I have 14 unresolved bugs (also i watch 16 more re
d3fault said:
> Unable to confirm the race condition, which is why I'm posting here
> instead of filing the bug report. Isn't there a race condition between
> calling QProcess::start() and QProcess::waitForFinished()?
>
> Can't the OS switch contexts at ANY TIME (in this case, between the
> start(
22 matches
Mail list logo
