Hi,
I just downloaded the windows SDK: http://qt-project.org/downloads
However, the packages seem to be a little on the outdated side. Could
the SDK be updated to contain the latest packages?
Or perhaps wait till Qt 2.8.4 is released along with QtCreator 2.6?
Cheers,
Mark
On 22 October 2012 00:32, Geoffrey Gowey gjgo...@gjgowey.com wrote:
dialogs/qfiledialog.cpp, line 897: Error: Too few arguments in call to
getpwnam_r(const char*, passwd*, char*, int, passwd**).
And again this is the same error than last time :)
On 19.10.2012 19:26, Sune Vuorela wrote:
no. it would be if you compiled Qt yourself or if you downloaded the
built editions from digia, write qmake to build things. if you gotten
from your linux distribution write probably
qmake5,
Developers tend to be computer savvy people, they should be
On 21/10/2012 18:42, Knoll Lars wrote:
Please read Thiago's latest proposal (see thread 'New proposal for tools
naming'). It proposes something very similar to what you are asking for here.
Yeah seen the different thread too late. :-/
The latest proposal looks very good to me!
Cheers,
Fine with me, with a comment inline.
++ Eike
On 20 Oct 2012, at 01:16, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
Starting a new thread with some ideas based on the outcomes of the
discussion.
Many thanks to rittk, Simon, Lars and André who helped come up with this.
Note: this
20.10.2012, 03:16, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com:
b) additionally, it accepts an extra argument (-select), which causes it to
select a different Qt version. For example:
qmake -qt=5 -project
qmake -qt=4.8.4 CONFIG+=debug
I like this idea. Among other benefits,
Hi,
In Qt 5 we're relying on libxcb instead of the aging xlib. One drawback is that
it limits the portability of Qt binaries on Linux (AFAIK xcb isn't part of any
LSB). But it turns out the real dealbreaker when trying to have a somewhat
portable Qt binary on Linux is libxcb-icccu: E.g. I
22.10.2012, 15:53, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com:
Hi,
In Qt 5 we're relying on libxcb instead of the aging xlib. One drawback is
that it limits the portability of Qt binaries on Linux (AFAIK xcb isn't part
of any LSB). But it turns out the real dealbreaker when trying to have a
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:08:14AM +0200, Samuel Rødal wrote:
On 19 October 2012 21:56, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com
wrote:
i don't see why this shouldn't apply equally to qml. if it poses a
problem in a particular case, it is most likely indicative of a serious
API
On 10/22/2012 01:53 PM, Koehne Kai wrote:
Hi,
In Qt 5 we're relying on libxcb instead of the aging xlib. One drawback is
that it limits the portability of Qt binaries on Linux (AFAIK xcb isn't part
of any LSB). But it turns out the real dealbreaker when trying to have a
somewhat portable
22.10.2012, 15:53, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com:
Hi,
In Qt 5 we're relying on libxcb instead of the aging xlib. One drawback is
that it limits the portability of Qt binaries on Linux (AFAIK xcb isn't part
of any LSB). But it turns out the real dealbreaker when trying to have a
On Friday, October 19, 2012 04:16:14 PM Thiago Macieira wrote:
Starting a new thread with some ideas based on the outcomes of the
discussion. Many thanks to rittk, Simon, Lars and André who helped come up
with this.
(and Tor Arne!)
Note: this applies to the *tools* only. The library naming
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On
Behalf Of Samuel Rødal
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 2:10 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] xcb-icccm
The more I read the various related threads, the more I think if qt-project is
to do anything it should be to define to LSB/FHS how to configure Qt. I don't
necessarily see consensus; but I do see a lot of questions that have gone
unanswered. There seems to be a lot of objection to user tool
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 10.59.58, Ziller Eike wrote:
In turn, the official Qt 5 documentation should always talk about qmake
like so:
qmake -qt5 LIBS+=-L/usr/local/lib -lmysqlclient_r mysql.pro
Just as a side note, that requires that Windows and Mac to also have
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 15.19.57, Simon Hausmann wrote:
I haven't decided whether this tool should be a shell script, a perl
script
or another bootstrapped executable.
I'm inclined to suggest a bootstrapped executable. If it had a shell
sourcing mode like dbus-launch,
On Monday, October 22, 2012 07:50:37 AM Thiago Macieira wrote:
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 15.19.57, Simon Hausmann wrote:
I haven't decided whether this tool should be a shell script, a perl
script
or another bootstrapped executable.
I'm inclined to suggest a
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 09.40.34, Mark wrote:
Hi,
I just downloaded the windows SDK: http://qt-project.org/downloads
However, the packages seem to be a little on the outdated side. Could
the SDK be updated to contain the latest packages?
Or perhaps wait till Qt 2.8.4 is
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 16.16.57, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
22.10.2012, 15:53, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com:
Hi,
In Qt 5 we're relying on libxcb instead of the aging xlib. One drawback is
that it limits the portability of Qt binaries on Linux (AFAIK xcb isn't
part of
On 22 Oct 2012, at 16:47, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 10.59.58, Ziller Eike wrote:
In turn, the official Qt 5 documentation should always talk about qmake
like so:
qmake -qt5 LIBS+=-L/usr/local/lib -lmysqlclient_r mysql.pro
22.10.2012, 18:49, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com:
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 15.41.19, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
20.10.2012, 03:16, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com:
b) additionally, it accepts an extra argument (-select), which causes it
to select a
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 14.59.09, Ziller Eike wrote:
Just as a side note, that requires that Windows and Mac to also have this
tool, and e.g. on Windows to have that tool in the PATH and pointing to
the
corresponding Qt for the environment set up shell scripts. In the SDK,
Hello,
On 5 October 2012 11:39, Taipale Juhani juhani.taip...@digia.com wrote:
It is time to create new Qt 4.8.4 release. We will have over 80 new fixes
there, some of them urgently requested.
We will freeze the content next week and create first release candidates for
testing.
If You are
On 22 October 2012 19:12, Geoffrey Gowey gjgo...@gjgowey.com wrote:
BTW- Who do I write to in order to get these bugfixes incorporated?
Stepping away then trying to do a pull down and build is causing me grief
since I forgot that I already reported these bugs.
You're strongly encouraged to
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:08:38AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 15.45.56, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:16:14PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Note: this applies to the *tools* only. The library naming and
installation
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 19.23.23, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
only if you conveniently ignore my two (or three?) mails saying the
exact
opposite. the problem with renaming the libraries is the same as with
tools: project files not based on qmake need to be adjusted.
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 13.12.13, Geoffrey Gowey wrote:
hmm... the only defines occurring are the defaults created by
configure.Commenting out everything out so only
err = getpwnam_r(userName.toLocal8Bit().constData(), pw, buf,
bufSize, tmpPw);
remains results in a
Some other thoughts from IRC:
the helper process should be installed to libexec, regardless of the outcome
of the tool renaming discussion. This is an executable run by a library and
that doesn't make sense being run standalone, so it's the textbook example of
libexec.
Adding the QtWebKit
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:19:17AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 19.23.23, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
only if you conveniently ignore my two (or three?) mails saying the
exact
opposite. the problem with renaming the libraries is the same as with
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:08:38AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 15.45.56, Oswald
Buddenhagen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:16:14PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Note: this applies to the *tools* only. The library naming and
installation paths
Hey
I tried to get Qt5 installed on windows7 for using in my project with
cmake.
I installed the binary packages of the qt5 beta for windows and installed
it. I proceeded to try to configure with my cmakelists.txt, following this
guide: http://doc-snapshot.qt-project.org/5.0/cmake-manual.html
I am
On Monday, October 22, 2012 21:46:22 Tobias Widlund wrote:
Hey
I tried to get Qt5 installed on windows7 for using in my project with
cmake.
I installed the binary packages of the qt5 beta for windows and installed
it. I proceeded to try to configure with my cmakelists.txt, following this
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 21.21.17, André Pönitz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:08:38AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 15.45.56, Oswald
Buddenhagen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:16:14PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Note:
On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 20.52.49, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
I can't fix what's already broken due to the Qt 3 and Qt 4 mess. I can
only fix going forward for Qt 5.
i fail to see your argument here. what exactly is the reason why having
the apps and the tools in the same
Dear Qt developers,
I got a new toy at work -- a 27 LCD with some crazy resolution
(2560x1440 IIRC), i,e. its pixel density is roughly 109 PPI. The LCD I
use at home has got a 94 PPI grid. I frequently move my laptop between
these two places and I have yet to make my KDE 4.9 use fonts which look
On Oct 19, 2012 8:12 AM, Roseline Thompson roselinethom...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I am not afraid of death hence I know where I am going.
After thoroughly analyzing your email, I have concluded that your argument
is not logical. Bish.
d3fault
___
May I have a list of the core security team members who I am forced to
entrust the security of my operations unto, so that I may hire private
detectives to do background checks on them (and also sneak into their homes
while they're away to perform a security analysis on their machines)? Thanks
37 matches
Mail list logo
