2011/6/2 Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/5/28 John Bonesio bo...@secretlab.ca:
This patch makes it so the top level audio card is initialized from the
device
tree. This is just the first step getting the audio
On 05/31/2011 02:23 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 14:19:02 -0500
Meador Inge meador_i...@mentor.com wrote:
This binding documents how the message register blocks found in some FSL
MPIC implementations shall be represented in a device tree.
Signed-off-by: Meador Inge
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Mitch Bradley w...@firmworks.com wrote:
Perhaps the interrupt-mapping binding is not the best model. Interrupt
hardware in general is hierarchical but is not isomorphic to the physical
addressing hierarchy of the device tree.
GPIOs share the need to point
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 08:59:55AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
My perspective is that cut/pasting the entire SoC definition into a board
definition is the devicetree equivalent of having more than one
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 05:07:02PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
2011/6/2 Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/5/28 John Bonesio bo...@secretlab.ca:
This patch makes it so the top level audio card is initialized from the
2011/6/3 Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 05:07:02PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
2011/6/2 Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/5/28 John Bonesio bo...@secretlab.ca:
This patch makes
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:27:18PM -0700, John Bonesio wrote:
- if (pdata pdata-gpio_base)
+ wm8903-gpio_chip.base = -1;
+ if (pdata pdata-gpio_base) {
wm8903-gpio_chip.base =
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 10:04:45AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
Right now we can't do dynamic registration for on-chip devices in a
lot of cases because we don't have the infrastructure to hook up the
associated struct clks.
I've been wondering about this, and I don't see it as a blocking
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 12:21:50AM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
Arnd has required me to use device tree in our new SoC for the coming
upstream. so i am trying to define a property like clock = uart in
dts. then in drivers,
i get this string by:
clk = of_get_property(np, clock, NULL);
then
2011/6/3 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 10:04:45AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
Right now we can't do dynamic registration for on-chip devices in a
lot of cases because we don't have the infrastructure to hook up the
associated struct clks.
I've been
2011/6/3 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 12:21:50AM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
Arnd has required me to use device tree in our new SoC for the coming
upstream. so i am trying to define a property like clock = uart in
dts. then in drivers,
i get this
11 matches
Mail list logo
