Hi Grant,
Thanks.
2011/6/13 Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Barry Song baohua.s...@csr.com wrote:
The current ads7846 has no OF match table. The method used is by applying a
heuristic (of_modalias_node) which tries to name the device in a way that
* Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org [110612 11:55]:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
I don't see this as a sustainable way forward. If we're going to move a
particular SoC over to DT, we need to move the entire SoC over. We can't
do this half-heartedly.
And
* Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org [110611 23:02]:
This is needed for proper alignment when the DTB appending feature
is used.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
---
arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.in |3 +++
1
* Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org [110611 23:03]:
From: John Bonesio bo...@secretlab.ca
This patch provides the ability to boot using a device tree that is appended
to the raw binary zImage (e.g. cat zImage filename.dtb zImage_w_dtb).
Signed-off-by: John Bonesio bo...@secretlab.ca
* Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org [110611 23:03]:
The appended DTB gets relocated with the decompressor code to get out
of the way of the decompressed kernel. However the .bss section may
be larger than the relocated code and data, therefore overwriting the
DTB. Let's make sure the
* Nicolas Pitre n...@fluxnic.net [110611 23:09]:
On Fri, 13 May 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
From: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 05:29:49 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: zImage: Make sure appended device tree data won't
overlap kernel BSS
Do this before
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 02:06:38AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.in
b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.in
index ea80abe..6c02db1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.in
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.in
@@ -47,6
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 03:46:49AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org [110611 23:03]:
From: John Bonesio bo...@secretlab.ca
This patch provides the ability to boot using a device tree that is appended
to the raw binary zImage (e.g. cat zImage
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
Thanks.
2011/6/13 Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Barry Song baohua.s...@csr.com wrote:
The current ads7846 has no OF match table. The method used is by applying a
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
---
Hey all,
This is an early draft of the usage model document for the device
tree, but I wanted to get it out there for feedback, and so that some
of the Linaro engineers could get started on migrating board ports.
g.
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 02:06:38AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.in
b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.in
index ea80abe..6c02db1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.in
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 03:46:49AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org [110611 23:03]:
From: John Bonesio bo...@secretlab.ca
This patch provides the ability to boot using a device tree that is
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org [110612 11:55]:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
I don't see this as a sustainable way forward. If we're going to move a
particular SoC over to DT, we need to move the entire SoC
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:14:07AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org [110612 11:55]:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
I don't see this as a sustainable way forward. If we're going to
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [110613 07:16]:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:14:07AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org [110612 11:55]:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:14:07AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
I agree that we need to parse the user configurable ATAGs to support
existing hardware properly. Otherwise we have edit the
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:14:07AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
I agree that we need to parse the user configurable
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:40:01AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
Mark,
On 06/08/2011 10:54 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi,
static int __devinit pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
+ enum arm_pmu_type type = pdev-id;
- if (pdev-id 0 || pdev-id= ARM_NUM_PMU_DEVICES) {
+
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:32:15 -0600 Grant Likely wrote:
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
---
Hey all,
This is an early draft of the usage model document for the device
tree, but I wanted to get it out there for feedback, and so that some
of the Linaro engineers could
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:22:20AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
From: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com
This adds gic initialization using device tree data. An example device tree
binding looks like this:
intc: interrupt-controller@fff11000 {
compatible = arm,cortex-a9-gic;
Grant Likely wrote at Monday, June 13, 2011 7:32 AM:
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
---
Hey all,
This is an early draft of the usage model document for the device
tree, but I wanted to get it out there for feedback, and so that some
of the Linaro engineers could
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:52:17AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 05:38:23PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:21:31AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Nicolas Pitre
nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
This is a resend of those patches with fixups after the latest changes
in mainline.
[PATCH 1/3] ARM: zImage: ensure it is always a multiple of 64 bits in size
This
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:53:16AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:22:20AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
+- interrupt-controller : Identifies the node as an interrupt controller
+- #interrupt-cells : Specifies the number of cells needed to encode an
+ interrupt source.
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, David Brown wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:52:17AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 05:38:23PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:52:17AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 05:38:23PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:21:31AM +0100,
+Some time later, FDT infrastructure was generalized to be usable by
+all architectures. At the time of this writing, 5 mainlined
+architectures (arm, mips, powerpc, sparc, and x86) and 1 out of
microblaze too?
+mainline architecture (nios) have some level of DT support.
+
Steve
This
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Stephen Neuendorffer
stephen.neuendorf...@xilinx.com wrote:
+Some time later, FDT infrastructure was generalized to be usable by
+all architectures. At the time of this writing, 5 mainlined
+architectures (arm, mips, powerpc, sparc, and x86) and 1 out of
On Sun, Jun 12 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
It is not pointless. Never it was in the cards to convert old platforms
first. The most problematic platforms responsible for the high volume
of changes that has gone in mainline lately are the modern ones, not PXA
based ones. So DT is going to
Comments below. Only really considering gaps in content or emphasis
here, not poor wording or grammatical errors.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 07:32:15AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
---
Hey all,
This is an early draft of the usage model
30 matches
Mail list logo
