Hi Rob,
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 09:03:31PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
Jamie,
On 12/18/2011 04:13 AM, Jamie Iles wrote:
The Synopsys DesignWare block is used in some ARM devices (picoxcell)
and can be configured to provide multiple banks of GPIO pins. The first
bank (A) can also provide
Hi Richard,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:21:40AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
It support single core and multi-core ARM SoCs. But currently it assume
all cores share the same frequency and voltage.
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao richard.z...@linaro.org
---
Hi Benoit,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:02:34PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Add initial device-tree support for twl familly chips.
The current version is missing the regulator entries due
to the lack of DT regulator bindings for the moment.
Only the simple sub-modules that do not depend on
Hi Rob,
While trying your series to take advantage of the generic-irq domain
support for OMAP3 INTC, I realized that the following patch is breaking
drivers that are using irq_domain_add_simple.
The point is that irq_domain_add_simple does not populate hwirq_base or
nr_irq, so that test
Hi Grant and Rob,
Gentle ping: Do you have some comment on that series?
Thanks,
Benoit
On 12/5/2011 3:23 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Hi Grant Rob,
Following the previous patch submission [1], here is an updated series
that adds the support for both reg and irq names.
A small improvement is
Salut Samuel,
On 12/19/2011 1:03 PM, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
Hi Benoit,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:02:34PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Add initial device-tree support for twl familly chips.
The current version is missing the regulator entries due
to the lack of DT regulator bindings for the
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:15:57PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
It adds device tree probe support for mc13892-regulator driver.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org
Cc: Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Cc: Liam Girdwood l...@ti.com
Ping?
--
Regards,
Shawn
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:19:29PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:05:12AM +, Jamie Iles wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:21:40AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
It support single core and multi-core ARM SoCs. But currently it assume
all cores share
On 12/19/2011 08:39 AM, Jamie Iles wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:19:29PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:05:12AM +, Jamie Iles wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:21:40AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
It support single core and multi-core ARM SoCs. But
* Rob Herring | 2011-12-16 23:18:49 [-0600]:
This is needed to avoid struct collisions with the generic irq_domain
support being added to kernel/irq/generic-chip.c.
Boot tested, but not on a DT enabled platform.
I had a patch in my tree for this and it did not work. One bug was fixed
by eef24a
On 12/19/2011 3:23 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
Benoit,
On 12/19/2011 06:41 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
Hi Rob,
While trying your series to take advantage of the generic-irq domain
support for OMAP3 INTC, I realized that the following patch is breaking
drivers that are using irq_domain_add_simple.
Hi Alessandro,
Gentle ping on this patch.
Thanks,
Benoit
On 12/9/2011 3:02 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Add the DT support for the TI rtc-twl present in the twl4030
and twl6030 devices.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Coussonb-cous...@ti.com
Cc: Alessandro Zummoa.zu...@towertech.it
---
Hi,
Some comments below, but also a more general question: How much of
this generic data makes sense to encode in the device tree? Final
hardware configuration usually has to take into consideration board
layout/signal delays, etc, and that's not part of this binding.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at
Oh wait, when I saw 3/3 I realized the following too:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Aneesh V ane...@ti.com wrote:
+- phy-type : string indicating the phy type. Should be one of the
+ following:
+
+ phy-type-omap4 : PHY used in OMAP4 family of SoCs
+
+ phy-type-dm81xx : PHY used
Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote at Sunday, December 18, 2011 11:54 PM:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com wrote:
This fixes some section mismatch build warnings.
What was the error was a devinit function called from these?
As I Understand It, probe/remove are
On 12/18/11 17:03, Richard Zhao wrote:
Do you have to patch to implement per-cpu udelay? In current code, udelay uses
global loops_per_jiffy.
We've been carrying forward the timer based udelay patches. They're in
the patch tracker as 6873/1, 6874/1, and 6875/1.
--
Sent by an employee of
On Dec 17, 2011, at 04:20, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 02:34:37PM -0600, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
On Dec 14, 2011, at 07:02, Mark Brown wrote:
The regulator API in -next has DT bindings.
Based on the description of our hardware, is there a good way that I
can wire up
From: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com
Convert the pl061 irq_chip code to use the generic irq chip code.
This has the side effect of using 32-bit accesses rather than 8-bit
accesses to interrupt registers. The h/w TRM and testing seem to indicate
this is fine.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com
Enable DT interrupt binding support for pl061 gpio lines. If the gpio
node has an interrupt-controller property, then it will be setup to
handle interrupts on gpio lines.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com
Cc: Grant Likely
* Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com [111219 14:29]:
On 12/19/2011 08:05 AM, Aneesh V wrote:
This is an RFC to add new device tree bindings for DDR memories and
EMIF - TI's DDR SDRAM controller.
The first patch adds bindings for DDR memories. Currently,
we have added properties for
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:07:31PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:15:57PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
It adds device tree probe support for mc13892-regulator driver.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org
Cc: Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Cc:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:15:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
+Sub-nodes:
+- regulators : Contain the regulator nodes. The name of regulator node
+ is being used by mc13xxx regulator driver to find the correct relator
+ device.
Reading this I'm not clear what the name of the node is, or what
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 03:49:33PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
I'm OK with this but would prefer that OMAP or TWL people were OK with
it too. If you do need to respin:
+For twl4030 regulators/LDO's
' should *not* be used for plurals except when omitting a duplicated s
introduced by one
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:54:15AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:07:31PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:15:57PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
It adds device tree probe support for mc13892-regulator driver.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:37:12AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
It seems that Samuel has applied it.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/10441
Oh, that's a bit unfortunate as looking at the first patch I'm still not
happy I understand what the regulator part of the binding is
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:56:41AM -0600, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
I still don't understand how the regulator API is supposed to help in my
particular case (whole-system poweroff).
Well, it depends what you need to do. In the ST-Ericsson case what they
needed to do was collapse the core
The Synopsys DesignWare block is used in some ARM devices (picoxcell)
and can be configured to provide multiple banks of GPIO pins. The first
bank (A) can also provide IRQ capabilities.
v2: - use Rob Herring's irqdomain in generic irq chip patches
- use reg property to indicate bank
Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles ja...@jamieiles.com
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/picoxcell-pc3x2.dtsi | 19 ---
arch/arm/boot/dts/picoxcell-pc3x3.dtsi | 28 +++-
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/picoxcell-pc3x2.dtsi
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:57:09AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:15:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
+Sub-nodes:
+- regulators : Contain the regulator nodes. The name of regulator node
+ is being used by mc13xxx regulator driver to find the correct relator
+ device.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 01:34:25AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:37:12AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
It seems that Samuel has applied it.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/10441
Oh, that's a bit unfortunate as looking at the first patch I'm still
On Dec 19, 2011, at 20:38, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:56:41AM -0600, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
I still don't understand how the regulator API is supposed to help in my
particular case (whole-system poweroff).
Well, it depends what you need to do. In the ST-Ericsson case what
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:29:29PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
This fixes some section mismatch build warnings.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
Ben, since the patch is trivial, I've picked it up in tegra
for-3.3/drivers and will merge that way. Let me know if you disagree.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:29:30PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
One of the Tegra I2C blocks is inside the DVC (Digital Voltage Controller)
block. This block is identical to the rest of the I2C blocks, except that
it only supports master mode, it has registers moved around, and it needs
some
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:29:31PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
Update the device tree to indicate which I2C controller is the DVC
controller. AUXDATA needs to be updated too, since the compatible
value changed.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
Thanks, applied to for-3.3/dt.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:29:32PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
The ADT7461 is a temperature monitoring IC. One is present on the DVC
I2C bus on Seaboard.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
Thanks, applied to for-3.3/dt.
-Olof
___
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:01:02AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:57:09AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:15:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
+Sub-nodes:
+- regulators : Contain the regulator nodes. The name of regulator node
+ is being used by
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 01:59:32AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:01:02AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:57:09AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:15:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
+Sub-nodes:
+- regulators : Contain the
37 matches
Mail list logo
