On 09/14/2012 12:24 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/13/2012 01:29 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:26:34PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2012 15:19:30 Mark Brown wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:25:53 Mark Brown wrote:
It would be sensible to make
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:29:37, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
OK that is typical pinctrl driver implementation work.
I hope Tony can advice on this?
I think we're best off to just stick to alternative named modes
passed
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:53:08AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/24/2012 09:35 AM, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
Parse a display-node with timings and hardware-specs from devictree.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/display
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:52 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata anilku...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:29:37, Linus Walleij wrote:
This is what we're doing for ux500 and should be a good model.
I have looked into this, but not seen any named modes.
OK maybe it's not easy to find. If you look
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Andrew Lunn and...@lunn.ch wrote:
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 18:01:00 +0200
From: Fabio Porcedda fabio.porce...@gmail.com
To: Wim Van Sebroeck w...@iguana.be, linux-watch...@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org, Nicolas Ferre
Hello Michael Buesch,
The patch bfb9bcdbda9a: spi-gpio: allow operation without CS signal
from Apr 2, 2009, leads to the following Clang warning:
drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c:229:9: warning: comparison of constant
18446744073709551615 with expression of type 'unsigned int' is always
true
On 10/02/2012 10:06 PM, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 09/30/2012 11:29 PM, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
Hello Stephen Warren,
The binding names that I use in my dts file should match with the
names given in
On 10/03/2012 02:24 AM, Alex Courbot wrote:
On 09/14/2012 12:24 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/13/2012 01:29 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:26:34PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2012 15:19:30 Mark Brown wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:25:53
Hi all,
This patchset is for adding device tree support to the
at91sam9_wdt driver.
Another patchset will follow to add the new timeout binding to the
watchdog framework and to all the relevant drivers.
Changes:
v8:
- add __initconst to at91_wdt_dt_ids
v7:
- split the patchset
- remove
Tested on an at91sam9260 board (evk-pro3)
Signed-off-by: Fabio Porcedda fabio.porce...@gmail.com
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/atmel-wdt.txt | 15 +++
drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.c | 11 +++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
create
Tested on evk-pro3.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Porcedda fabio.porce...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/evk-pro3.dts | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/evk-pro3.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/evk-pro3.dts
index b7354e6..ce959ee 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/evk-pro3.dts
Tested on an at91sam9260 board (evk-pro3).
Signed-off-by: Fabio Porcedda fabio.porce...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9260.dtsi | 6 ++
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi | 6 ++
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g45.dtsi | 6 ++
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git
* AnilKumar, Chimata anilku...@ti.com [121003 03:53]:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:29:37, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
OK that is typical pinctrl driver implementation work.
I hope Tony can advice on this?
I think we're
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote:
On 17:04 Tue 02 Oct , Fabio Porcedda wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Andrew Lunn and...@lunn.ch wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 02:54:55PM +0200, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Andrew Lunn and...@lunn.ch wrote:
I was thinking to add a more generic helper function like this:
static inline void watchdog_get_dttimeout(struct device_node *node,
u32 *timeout)
{
if (node)
of_property_read_u32(node, timeout,
On 10/02/2012 09:33 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi Rob
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
On 09/27/2012 09:07 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
This patch adds a document, describing common V4L2 device tree bindings.
Co-authored-by: Sylwester Nawrocki s.nawro...@samsung.com
Hi Matt,
On 2 October 2012 16:25, Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com wrote:
...
I can see why you went this path with the iommu driver as it already had
some integration code present here. I have some concerns going forward
about how this should be long-term. Take any platform booting only with
DT
On 18:32 Wed 03 Oct , Fabio Porcedda wrote:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote:
On 17:04 Tue 02 Oct , Fabio Porcedda wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Andrew Lunn and...@lunn.ch wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at
On 10/01/2012 06:08 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:41:09AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/01/2012 12:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:34:50PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/29/2012 05:53 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at
From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
The previous definition of e.g. for_each_*() would always include the
very first object within the list of processed labels, irrespective of
whether it was marked deleted, since the deleted flag was not checked
on the first object, but only on any next
On 09/27/2012 06:44 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Add LCD definitions and also a proposed binding for LCD displays.
The PWM is as per what will likely be committed to linux-next soon.
The displaymode binding comes from a proposal here:
On 09/27/2012 06:44 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Add LCD definitions and also a proposed binding for LCD displays.
The PWM is as per what will likely be committed to linux-next soon.
The displaymode binding comes from a proposal here:
On 09/27/2012 06:44 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
The Seaboard has a 1366x768 16bpp LCD. The backlight is controlled
by one of the PWMs.
diff --git a/board/nvidia/dts/tegra20-seaboard.dts
b/board/nvidia/dts/tegra20-seaboard.dts
+ host1x {
+ dc@5420 {
So based on my previous
On 10/03/2012 05:32 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
The previous definition of e.g. for_each_*() would always include the
very first object within the list of processed labels, irrespective of
whether it was marked deleted, since the deleted flag was not
On Monday, October 01, 2012 2:40 PM Ajay kumar wrote
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com wrote:
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:45 PM Sylwester Nawrocki wrote
On 09/24/2012 09:36 PM, Ajay Kumar wrote:
[...]
+Example:
+
+SOC specific portion:
+
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 03:33:30PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/01/2012 06:08 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:41:09AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/01/2012 12:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:34:50PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 04:32:54PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
The previous definition of e.g. for_each_*() would always include the
very first object within the list of processed labels, irrespective of
whether it was marked deleted, since the
27 matches
Mail list logo
