On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 13:27:34 +0800, Wei Yongjun weiyj...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Wei Yongjun yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn
In case of error, the function clk_get() returns ERR_PTR()
and never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return value
check should be replaced with IS_ERR().
dpatch
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:08:11PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 13:27:34 +0800, Wei Yongjun weiyj...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Wei Yongjun yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn
In case of error, the function clk_get() returns ERR_PTR()
and never returns NULL. The NULL test in the
On 11/15/2012 08:08 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 13:27:34 +0800, Wei Yongjun weiyj...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Wei Yongjun yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn
In case of error, the function clk_get() returns ERR_PTR()
and never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return value
check
From: Wei Yongjun yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn
In case of error, the function clk_get() returns ERR_PTR()
and never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return value
check should be replaced with IS_ERR().
dpatch engine is used to auto generate this patch.
(https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch)
On 11/01/2012 01:27 AM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
From: Wei Yongjun yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn
In case of error, the function clk_get() returns ERR_PTR()
and never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return value
check should be replaced with IS_ERR().
dpatch engine is used to auto generate this
clk or clock-frequency not
defined\n);
- return -ENODEV;
+ return PTR_ERR(info-clk);
I think this is wrong. it should return -ENODEV;
Returning the clock error at least ensures the real reason for the fail
is reported. I
