On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 09:17:26AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:02:44AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2011 09:45:07 AM Shawn Guo wrote:
The patch makes a copy of platform data into driver data, so that any
reference to platform_data after .probe
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 08:48:41AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 09:17:26AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:02:44AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2011 09:45:07 AM Shawn Guo wrote:
The patch makes a copy of platform
The patch makes a copy of platform data into driver data, so that any
reference to platform_data after .probe exits can be avoided.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org
Cc: Phil Blundell p...@handhelds.org
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov d...@mail.ru
---
drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c | 45
On Monday, July 18, 2011 09:45:07 AM Shawn Guo wrote:
The patch makes a copy of platform data into driver data, so that any
reference to platform_data after .probe exits can be avoided.
And why is this beneficial? I am of the opinion that platform data should
stay on (and be accessed through a
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2011 09:45:07 AM Shawn Guo wrote:
The patch makes a copy of platform data into driver data, so that any
reference to platform_data after .probe exits can be avoided.
And why is this
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:02:44AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2011 09:45:07 AM Shawn Guo wrote:
The patch makes a copy of platform data into driver data, so that any
reference to platform_data after .probe exits can be avoided.
And why is this beneficial? I am of the
