Hi Grant,
On 1/4/2012 7:12 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:02:34PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
[...]
@@ -1183,22 +1187,53 @@ twl_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct
i2c_device_id *id)
int status;
unsigned
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:02:34PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Add initial device-tree support for twl familly chips.
The current version is missing the regulator entries due
to the lack of DT regulator bindings for the moment.
Only the simple sub-modules that do not depend on
platform_data
Hi Benoit,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:02:34PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Add initial device-tree support for twl familly chips.
The current version is missing the regulator entries due
to the lack of DT regulator bindings for the moment.
Only the simple sub-modules that do not depend on
Salut Samuel,
On 12/19/2011 1:03 PM, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
Hi Benoit,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:02:34PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Add initial device-tree support for twl familly chips.
The current version is missing the regulator entries due
to the lack of DT regulator bindings for the
Add initial device-tree support for twl familly chips.
The current version is missing the regulator entries due
to the lack of DT regulator bindings for the moment.
Only the simple sub-modules that do not depend on
platform_data information can be initialized properly.
Add documentation for the
