On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:43:11PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 02:56:18PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
From: Alexander Shishkin alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com
As reported by Dan Carpenter, there is a NULL check in udc_start() that
follows a dereference of the pointer
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 02:56:18PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
From: Alexander Shishkin alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com
As reported by Dan Carpenter, there is a NULL check in udc_start() that
follows a dereference of the pointer that's being checked. However, at
that point udc pointer
Dear Richard Zhao,
From: Alexander Shishkin alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com
As reported by Dan Carpenter, there is a NULL check in udc_start() that
follows a dereference of the pointer that's being checked. However, at
that point udc pointer shouldn't ever be NULL and if it is, the
From: Alexander Shishkin alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com
As reported by Dan Carpenter, there is a NULL check in udc_start() that
follows a dereference of the pointer that's being checked. However, at
that point udc pointer shouldn't ever be NULL and if it is, the dereference
should cause an
