On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 03:09:24PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Greg KH <gre...@suse.de> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 02:10:30PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > >> Greg and Kay, > >> > >> This is a patch from a larger series of OF related cleanup patches. This > >> one adds a new 'of_node' member to struct device, conditional upon > >> CONFIG_OF. The goal is to move of_node out of archdata because all > >> arches using CONFIG_OF need it. > >> > >> Before I commit too much effort down this path, I want to get your > >> feedback. Do you have any objections to this change to struct device? > >> > >> @@ -414,6 +415,9 @@ struct device { > >> override */ > >> /* arch specific additions */ > >> struct dev_archdata archdata; > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > >> + struct device_node *of_node; > >> +#endif > > > > No objection from me, but do we really need the #ifdef here? > > I added the #ifdef because it is complete dead weight when CONFIG_OF > is not set. However, I'll defer to your preference here on what looks > cleaner w.r.t. maintenance.
Ok, you can leave it as-is, that's not a problem. As long as we don't have to #ifdef the core code, it should be fine. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss