Re: [RESEND PATCH v7 00/22] MBus DT binding: The return of PCIe

2013-07-21 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Dear Andrew Lunn, On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:45:59 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: The patchset works only for Armada 370 and Armada XP SoC, not for Kirkwood. For some reason I was completely sure there wasn't any DT-enabled Kirkwood boards with PCIe support. I had a quick look at Dove and

Re: [RESEND PATCH v7 00/22] MBus DT binding: The return of PCIe

2013-07-20 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
Hi Grant, Arnd, Jason: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:57:29AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: Here's the new MBus DT binding, implementing the changes proposed by Thomas when we discussed the previous patchset: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg257170.html As far as I know, this

Re: [RESEND PATCH v7 00/22] MBus DT binding: The return of PCIe

2013-07-20 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:57:29AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: Here's the new MBus DT binding, implementing the changes proposed by Thomas when we discussed the previous patchset: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg257170.html As far as I know, this round fixes *all* the

Re: [RESEND PATCH v7 00/22] MBus DT binding: The return of PCIe

2013-07-20 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:57:29AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: Here's the new MBus DT binding, implementing the changes proposed by Thomas when we discussed the previous patchset:

Re: [RESEND PATCH v7 00/22] MBus DT binding: The return of PCIe

2013-07-20 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
Andrew, On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 07:38:47PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:57:29AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: Here's the new MBus DT binding, implementing the changes proposed by Thomas when we discussed