RE: [e-smith-devinfo] [BETA] new RAV panel for SME available

2002-02-07 Thread Dan Brown
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I got that phrase directly from the gnu site? Sure--on the FDL itself. You left out one important word when you took that phrase for your howto--verbatim copies of this *license* document.

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] [BETA] new RAV panel for SME available

2002-02-07 Thread Charlie Brady
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Darrell May wrote: Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: The licensing conditions on your documentation are inconsistent. I got that phrase directly from the gnu site? Is that a question or a statement? :-) Yes, the FSF site does state: The standard copyright notice

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] [BETA] new RAV panel for SME available

2002-02-07 Thread Brandon Friedman
Hi Darrell Just had a quick look and the add-on! As per usual great work... will test over the next few days! -Original Message- From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 05:12 To: e-smith-devinfo Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] [BETA] new RAV panel for SME

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] [BETA] new RAV panel for SME available

2002-02-06 Thread Jeff Coleman
Nice Darrell, at first blush, it simply worked fine on my 5.1.2 test box. -jeff -Original Message- From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:12 PM To: e-smith-devinfo Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] [BETA] new RAV panel for SME available

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] [BETA] new RAV panel for SME available

2002-02-06 Thread Charlie Brady
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Darrell May wrote: [BETA] For devinfo testing only. [BETA] http://myezserver.com/docs/mitel/rav-howto-beta.html ... Comments welcomed. The licensing conditions on your documentation are inconsistent. Your document claims: GNU Free Documentation License: Copyright (C)

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] [BETA] new RAV panel for SME available

2002-02-06 Thread Darrell May
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: The licensing conditions on your documentation are inconsistent. I got that phrase directly from the gnu site? Charlie, how about finding something _productive_to do with your time, like instead of picking on me, maybe put your time towards a RedHat 2.4